Chuck Callesto on X: "FLASHBACK: Jerry Nadler appears to poop his pants during LIVE INTERVIEW, waddles off stage to avoid drippage.. https://t.co/s8BXj18cje" / X
![]() |
If it's wrong for Trump to hate people, why is it OK for you to hate him? Do you not feel compelled to follow your own moral value which you wish to use to judge Trump?Quote:
I'm surprised tRump isn't dissing non-whites! He hates them. Actually, he hates everybody unless a somebody can line his pockets -- or kiss his fat butt.
That's what most hateful people say. Well, you can't use hateful words and then claim not to hate. Hate speaks the way you speak. "Actually, he hates everybody unless a somebody can line his pockets -- or kiss his fat butt." Sorry, but it's pretty hard to get "I feel sorry for him" from those words.Quote:
I don't hate him.
I think the lady needs to get honest with herself.
Good links, Tom. This one said it plainly. "Mr. Trump’s tallies today — 14 percent support among Black voters and 41 percent among Hispanic voters — would still represent the highest level of backing a Republican presidential candidate has received in pre-election polls since the enactment of the Civil Rights Act in 1964."
It's sad that black Americans, having escaped from antebellum slavery, have now voluntarily become so servile to the democrats. Perhaps they should begin to ask what that has gotten for them.
You never posted anything nice and unhateful about Biden or Harris or Walz. And you're not hateful?
Oh come on, WG. You get caught in your typical hateful comments about Trump, and try to justify it with a, "Oh yeah?? Well, you're hateful too, mister!!"Quote:
You never posted anything nice and unhateful about Biden or Harris or Walz
My criticisms of Biden and Harris are limited to policies and the fact that Harris has yet to hold a press conference since the DNC and has held, as far as I am aware, ONE interview, and that with her buddy Dana Bash. Even then, she seemed so insecure that she insisted on having Walz there. I don't engage in name-calling or making hateful remarks like someone else I know. You know, comments such as, ",..unlike arrogant and egotistical and demented tRump."
Now if you want to suggest that I DO engage in such comments, then it should be a simple matter for you to find a few. I will patently wait.
Gwen Walz is weird
Tim Walz CREEPY Wife Goes On INSANE Rant About TRUMP She’s A Complete PSYCHOPATH (youtube.com)
Turning the page ;as if Clueless Joe-Kam the Sham have not been running the show for almost 4 years .
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GXoSseuW...jpg&name=small
Hard to know how to respond to that.
well when AOC does it I call her All Out Crazy
'I Am Ready To Fight!': AOC Gives Passionate Remarks On Behalf Of Jamaal Bowman At Bronx Rally (youtube.com)
Gwen is a teacher . Now I admit some of my teachers were off the wall . But I always preferred a John Housman in 'Paper Chase ' type .
The Paper Chase 1973 - The Socratic Method (youtube.com)
We use half of the Socratic method on this site. We ask questions, then we wait for answers...and wait, and wait, and wait.
First it was Tampon Tim calling for limits on the 1st amendment . Now JFKerry is calling for the same at the World Economic Forum.
John Kerry Tells WEF: Our First Amendment Stands As A Major Block Against Hammering Disinformation Out Of Existence | Video | RealClearPoliticsQuote:
The dislike of and anguish over social media is just growing and growing. It is part of our problem, particularly in democracies, in terms of building consensus around any issue. It's really hard to govern today. You can't -- the referees we used to have to determine what is a fact and what isn't a fact have kind of been eviscerated, to a certain degree. And people go and self select where they go for their news, for their information. And then you get into a vicious cycle.
So it is really hard, much harder to build consensus today than at any time in the 40-50 years I've been involved in this.
You know there's a lot of discussion now about how you curb those entities in order to guarantee that you're going to have some accountability on facts, etc.
But look, if people only go to one source, and the source they go to is sick, and, you know, has an agenda and they're putting out disinformation, our First Amendment stands as a major block to be able to just, you know, hammer it out of existence.
So what we need is to win the ground, win the right to govern, by hopefully winning enough votes that you're free to be able to implement change.
Obviously, there are some people in our country who are prepared to implement change in a whole other way, but --
I think democracies are very challenged right now and have not proven they can move fast enough of big enough to deal with the challenges they are facing, and to me, that is part of what this election is all about. Will we break the fever in the United States?
yeah you could say our constitutional rights stand against government controlled speech and thought.
In other words, it's becoming more difficult for the powers that be to tell everyone else what to think.Quote:
The dislike of and anguish over social media is just growing and growing. It is part of our problem, particularly in democracies, in terms of building consensus around any issue.
Referees? What referees?Quote:
It's really hard to govern today. You can't -- the referees we used to have to determine what is a fact and what isn't a fact have kind of been eviscerated, to a certain degree.
I wonder if he realizes what an outlandish statement that is when he is critical of "people" going out and selecting their own news sources? Plainly, he wants to do the selecting for them. Should we have a government approved list of acceptable news sources? What if people choose to listen to an unapproved source, kind of like Germans who wanted to listen to the BBC in Nazi Germany?Quote:
And people go and self select where they go for their news, for their information. And then you get into a vicious cycle.
In other words, there is a lot of discussion on how to curb free speech, and how the governing class can hold the rest of us "accountable". Uhm...I think he has it backwards.Quote:
You know there's a lot of discussion now about how you curb those entities in order to guarantee that you're going to have some accountability on facts, etc.
What he means is the Slimes with " all the news fit to print " and Walter Cronkite telling us at the end of every broadcast "and that's the way it is " . They were the arbiters of truth .Quote:
Referees? What referees?
The rest you accurately translated his Big Brother Newspeak .
Wherefore art thou, Wondergirl???
Wonder if Walz will have to answer for his Chicom connection tonight in the debate ?
The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed DHS yesterday following whistleblower allegations about an internal employee group chat discussing “serious concerns” about Walz’s China ties.
Comer Subpoenas DHS After Whistleblower Reveals Information on Governor Walz’s Ties to the CCP - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GYwWYmRX...jpg&name=small
Earlier this month Comer was critical of the FBI for withholding information about Walz Chicom connection .
Comer: FBI's Silence Regarding Governor Walz's Relationship with CCP-Affiliated Entities and Officials is Inexcusable - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability
Interesting contradiction in the timeline. Walz has made a big deal over time that he was in China in June 1989 when the Tiananmen protests began .
But now old news accounts from that time prove he was NOT there.Quote:
““As a young man, I was just going to teach high school in Foshan in Guangdong, and was in Hong Kong in May of ’89,” he said. “And as the events were unfolding, several of us went in. And I still remember the train station in Hong Kong.”
“The opportunity to be in a Chinese high school at that critical time seemed to me to be really important. And it was a very interesting summer to say the least. Because if you recall, as we moved in that summer and further on and the news blackouts and things that went on, you certainly can’t black out news from people if they want to get it,” he continued.
CNN calls him out .
Walz’s claim that he was in Hong Kong during Tiananmen Square protests undercut by unearthed newspaper reports | CNN Politics
Walz says the time line is not important .
When asked by CNN if Walz was in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square protests, the Harris campaign was unable to provide evidence to substantiate Walz’s claim.
A source close to Walz told CNN that “the point Gov. Walz is making when he discusses this is that some folks in the World Teach program discussed dropping out after Tiananmen Square, but he continued on with the program because he believed it was important for the Chinese people to learn about American democracy and American history.”The contradiction was first reported by Minnesota Public Radio News and APM Reports
And he apparently exaggerated the number of trips he took to China
Depending on the day it was around 30 times ;dozens and dozens of times ;or 15 . The timeline is further muddled because some of the years in the timeline he was in Congress. But there are no records of him travelling there as a Rep.
It seems that dems are so confident that their loyal friends in the media will cover from them that they have very little concern for the truth.
yes anyway Walz effectively deflected the questions about his lies and inconsistencies</sarc>
He said "I’ve tried to do the best I can, but I’ve not been perfect, and I’m a knucklehead at time”
(translation ..... I am a liar who will not admit I lied when I get caught)So there you go ;move on . Then he said his time in China taught him how to govern.(the Chicom way ?)
Walz says he ‘misspoke’ after unearthed newspaper reports undercut claim he was in Hong Kong during Tiananmen Square protests | CNN Politics
Never got an answer from Walz how they plan to stop Iran from getting nukes.
lol !!!!
Love former Obot David Axelrod's response to Walz' muddled excuse for his response about visits to China.
'if I were Walz, I would’ve delivered the line about Tiananmen Square, that answer in Chinese, and it would’ve been more understandable than the one he gave.”
Walz in his closing argument said that Kam has a coalition “from Bernie Sanders to Cheney to Taylor Swift.” Now you're talking . Kam has the confused feeling ;endless war ,socialist vote locked up !!!
and if I hear ..... 'I came from a middle class family 'one more time I am going to barf.
It's like Dana Carvey's Clueless Joe impersonation . "folks " "guess what..."by the way " ".... "I'm being serious now " (whispers) 'the rich don't pay their fair share "
Harris and Trump Rallies Cold Open - SNL - YouTube
Vance self imposed the mercy rule on Walz He mostly attacked Kam the Sham and largely left alone the miserable failure of Walz's years as Guv.He let Walz bury himself with the China timeline 'He never mentioned stolen valor. He passed on attacking Walz CRT record ;his radical approach to education like social emotional learning (SEL) ;DEI and legislation that brings tampons in men's rooms and genital mutilation surgery . He did not bring up the fact that Walz let Minneapolis burn during riots.
He gave the floor unopposed to Walz to explain himself or bury himself . He expressed sympathy when Walz said his son had seen a shooting .He did not gloat when Walz said he was friends with a school shooter .
In his closing he said how tough a job Walz had trying to dedend Kam the Sham's failures.
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:10 PM. |