https://patriot.imgix.net/0a3bd22e1a...20&auto=format
|
Yep. No Trump hatred evident here.
It's not hatred. Lack of trust or faith on my part, would be more accurate. I have written we got the president we deserve and there is much shared blame in that regard. I don't think he is an honest, thoughtful man at all just to name a few of my concerns and his handling of the peoples business borders on antithetical to all the good people who have toiled and sacrificed for this country. In addition I've never liked bullies, so cannot support this one.
I'm only one vote and oppose the dufus on numerous fronts for numerous reasons. I've never hidden that fact nor will I.
So you voted for Hillary because she was high-character and thoughtful???
Certainly of higher character than the dufus, whose antics i knew of before her ran. He is a public figure. Plus HC was smarter by far.
What on earth did HC ever do that reflected being "smarter"?
That's easy enough to find out. Google is my friend.
I actually saw her in the heath care hearings in the 90's and many times since. Impressive. Not so good on the campaign trail. Let's see the dufus appear before the congress and answer questions numerous times, though he has been in court and bunch. Speaking of the dufus we have his lawyers, Roy Cohn, Michael Cohen, and now Bill Barr. Shady is the term I use for them.
And right on cue, it's the ole "mystery link" reply. Are you utterly incapable of putting your thoughts into words, or do you simply not know?
so your opinion is based on what used to be, not what isQuote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
Please clarify Clete.
Do you mean like you when asked to put in your own words that people go to hell for eternal punishment and all you can do is quote Bible verses and never put the idea in your own words - even when asked repeatedly? Is that what you mean?Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Many opinions here are based on just that - especially the past of Hillary Clinton, Obama, and Bill Clinton. Nothing new there.Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
Those three are not even in the same ball park when being compared to the Liar-in-Chief and his constant public inconsistencies - especially marked by his total (and killing) mismanagement of the Covid-19 crisis.
The dufus has two cases before SCOTUS as we speak Athos. One about turning over subpoenaed documents to congress, the other turning over documents to the US Attorney in a criminal investigation.
Is there a pattern emerging? Or is this more the same pattern from the dufus' history?
The same pattern.
His lawyers are arguing that Trump is above the law. That was settled 800 years ago with Magna Carta, and recently with Nixon resulting in Nixon handing over the tapes and then resigning.
Thought this was a well written insightful look into the dufus strategy to deflect his total incompetence at how he has handled this crisis so far while trying to get re elected. Of course there are plenty of embedded links to follow. Maybe JL will catch on to their significance.
You said you were impressed by HC in the 90's, people change, what might have been true then, in different circumstances, may not be true today. HC demonstated errors in judgement in office. We all lapse as we get older, thus in the present circumstance it may not be wise to trust either old man to high officeQuote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
Do you mean like I have done several times already and you have yet to do? But I'll tell you what. I will be happy to restate my view based upon your guarantee that it will be followed by you doing likewise. Agreed?Quote:
all you can do is quote Bible verses and never put the idea in your own words - even when asked repeatedly? Is that what you mean?
An article by NBC news who has allowed Chuck Todd to remain in his job, even after one of the most disgraceful episodes of deceit I have ever seen in television? Think I'll pass on that one.Quote:
Thought this was a well written insightful look into the dufus strategy to deflect his total incompetence at how he has handled this crisis so far while trying to get re elected. Of course there are plenty of embedded links to follow. Maybe JL will catch on to their significance.
Ol' Chuck has apologized for his statements, however dismissing the whole network for one statement is rather narrow given you still support the dufus who has never apologized for anything. I thought you thumpers could forgive when a person repents? Obviously you can forgive those that do not repent also if you want to. Maybe the one to be fired would be the dufus for hiring Barr in the first place by your logic.
You're welcome.
I guess you'll have to decide for yourself if you believe that Todd actually aired, and made a big deal out of, a video segment that he didn't bother to check out himself, or have a staff member check out. It was either shocking ignorance or willful deceit. Take your pick.
Ok you're a concerned citizen, we get it, but too much emphasis on the ME
Saw it myself during his regular afternoon daily show. Better than any apology, regret the dufus has ever expressed so you take your own pick between your highly conflated one event and the dufus HISTORY.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
His choices sums it up Clete, concerns over the virus and its deadly consequences and economic effects and government tyranny all of which is squarely on the shoulders of the dufus.Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
If you keep walking through life with your eyes closed then you are going to continue bumping into sharp objects.Quote:
concerns over the virus and its deadly consequences and economic effects and government tyranny all of which is squarely on the shoulders of the dufus.
My eyes are open to the cause and effects on humans in this crisis environment. It's tough on us all to some degree, be it financial, emotional, mental, physical, or spiritual.
I apppreciate the size and scope of the challenge.
The challenge is within us, our response must be measured, not the knee-jerks we are seeingQuote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
So Joe Biden, after much thought (no doubt) about who would be best qualified to formulate energy and climate policies, has decided to name AOC to that position. You just can't make this stuff up.
So much for the dismissal of the Flynn case out of hand.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/13/u...4969268de5c8c3
And so much for the rule of law when a supposedly impartial judge begins to advocate AGAINST a defendant and against the government. Absurd.
The rule of law is the issue here as the notion a judge just goes along with a petition without insuring it meets that rule of law would be what's absurd. Indeed it's the rule of law that allows judges the leeway to verify the legality of actions taken by both sides of the argument. Is that not the very definition of impartiality? You may see whatever the dufus says and does as legal and correct, yet you balk at verifying if it does meet the required standard of law.
Facts over feelings my friend, and the process of verification under the law proceeds.
Last week SCOTUS ruled 9-0 with Ginsburg authoring the majority opinion coming down hard on the 9th Circus for soliciting Amicus Briefs on behalf of one side of a case (United States v. Sineneng-Smith) . Judge Sullivan already should've been removed from the case for calling Flynn a traitor . He has also UNLAWFULLY appointed someone to act as the prosecution since the Justice Dept has decided to drop the case . His actions are unethical .Quote:
The rule of law is the issue
It is completely legal for the prosecution, upon discovering new evidence, to drop the case.Quote:
Indeed it's the rule of law that allows judges the leeway to verify the legality of actions taken by both sides of the argument. Is that not the very definition of impartiality?
And the person appointed ;John Gleeson ,has already rendered a verdict in an op-ed in the Washington Compost where he wrote ;“Flynn’s guilt has already been adjudicated.”
It is clear what is happening here . justice is not being sought . What the Dems want is to force the President's hand so he pardon's Flynn giving then another issue to campaign on.
To be decided by the judge.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
I'm sure whatever way this goes we will see a campaign ad against the dufus as cronyism is front and center. Manafort just went home and is Stone next?Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
Manafort confined to solitary confinement for the same thing that Tony Podesta was not even investigated for .
Stone and Manafort were convicted and what's stopping Barr from prosecuting anybody? Even HC. Wonder what Obamagate is? Why isn't Barr on that?
I think that will be very interesting before it's all over with. Using national intelligence information for political purposes sure sounds illegal to me.Quote:
Wonder what Obamagate is?
Yeah I know like the dufus birther claims, or being wiretapped, or the Russian hoax. Or injecting people with disinfectant. Or the great job he is doing? Lying to the American people isn't illegal, so just be careful believing what yo' boy says. Probably way to late to warn you though.
don't you think Trump wants anything and anyone to draw attention away from him. CV is an interruption, an inconvenience, and particularly because it has shown how inept he is. The great statesman (in his own opinion) has been shown to be even more of a buffoon. The best course of action is to do nothing, to let these things fizzle outQuote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
Funny how you are against lying and law-breaking until Obama does it.
Well he can't brag about his great economy since a bug came and destroyed it so he has to revert to the old talk crap routine. He's got nothing for the bug and wants nothing to do with it so let the governors and their states worry about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
You mean did it, since he's been gone 3 years now.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:22 PM. |