 |
That's only because yours aren't covered on the news most of the time because it would violate the right to privacy of the accused who have not yet been convicted.
You could have a serial rapist living next to you... and not even know it in Canada. Because their rights exceed yours.
Not to mention there are fewer people in Canda to begin with. The State of California has more people living there than the entire Country of Canada....
The right to self defense extends to protection from the government .Quote:
Too many loopholes for my sensibility, and who needs a 30 round clip for a semi automatic rifle? Hunters surely don't. Got no problems with the firing range though.
Did some posts go missing in this thread?
The Democrat Party agenda follows this to a "T"
Attachment 46251
Yep, sounds about right for you.
Defense from the government is best done by vote, and the court. The threat of tyranny of OUR government of the people lies in the corruption bought the old fashion way by the Oligarchs and their MONEY, they extracted (STOLE) through laws they wrote and exploited.
A gun won't change that.
And yet your people keep putting Bargara Fiensteirn, Barbara Boxer,Nancy Pelosi, Harry Ried, Durban and others back into office as they embody that and gained their personal wealth by exploiting it.
And they likely want to exterminate americans jews too, eh smoothy?
Yeah we should have voted for your nuts like Palin, Angle and that witch girl, in Delaware, or the rich guy whose expertise in making money was loading American companies with debt and closing them down for a profit and sending it to offshore safe havens.
"You can't bring a lawsuit to a gunfight" Palin says yesterday, but she thinks she can bring a gun to a lawsuit. Even you guys want her to shut up.
Poll: Americans Want Sarah Palin to Shut Up the Most | Mediaite
I am sure you have a loony right wing rag to quote differentlyQuote:
Notably, four out of every ten Republicans surveyed said that Palin should quiet down. (Two-thirds of Democrats and a “majority” of independents agreed with that sentiment.)
45% of respondents added that they wanted Jesse Jackson to be quiet, too; followed by Cheney (42%), Newt Gingrich (39%), Al Gore (37%), and Bill Clinton (31%).
Only 12% surveyed said that the politicians should keep talking.
Numbers don't lie, people.
Tal, all of them would have been HUGE improvements over any of the lunatics you actually have in offices... But then, look at the mess we have today... thanks to your people who actuallty ARE in office... you can't blame that on ANY of the ones the left likes to bash on... because they weren't responsible for ANY of it...
No... they are trying to exterminate the White race... not the Jews... same philosophy... only a different target group. Under teh Radar is they have been VERY effective at culling the Black race...with most Black pregnancies being terminated via abortions....and a near complete destruction of the Black family in only a few decades.Quote:
And they likely want to exterminate americans jews too, eh smoothy?
THe Liberals have been responsible for the deaths of far more blacks in the last decade alone...than the Nazi's were for the Deaths of every group combined in their final solution from its inception to its end.
They LOST! Thankfully. It would have been worse if they had won.
Ah, I see, thanks for the clarification smoothy.
I take it you're a strong proponent for "white power"?
It's that mindset that makes so many of us believe that places like California, Illinois (including Chicago) and every other place that voted for Obama... deserves the economy they are suffering through right now... because it they got EXACTLY what they voted for... unemployment, misery and poverty... and they deserve every bit of what has happened to them the last 6.5 years.Quote:
They LOST! Thankfully. It would have been worse if they had won.
I could have been a LOT better....but none of you wanted it to be any better.
Why did Rosa Parks need to sit in the front of the bus? Same question.Quote:
who needs a 30 round clip for a semi automatic rifle?
No, not at all.Quote:
Why did Rosa Parks need to sit in the front of the bus? Same question.
Rosa Parks didn't need a 30 clip semi automatic rifle to exercise her rights, why do you?
so you have disenfranchised a whole group of people with a wave of your dismissive hand, what you have shown is the thoughts your ilk have about other peopleQuote:
Those aren't Americans... those are Liberals that do that MOST of the time.
We have the Second Amendment that says we do... whether the lefties like it or not.
that isn't what you said you said lefties arn't americans
There is nothing about a right to 30 shot clips in the constitution. Limits can be set, and they have in the past.
I don't think most of them are... their allegance isn't to this country and its laws.
There is no right to protest or for people to flap their gums incessantly secifically written into it either... limits can be set and they have in the past...
In fact Illegals don't have ANY rights written in the constitution at all...
Nothing about where you ride in the wagon, either. The rear seats of the bus got there just as fast as the front. The arguments about "need" are spurious. The American people "need" to be as heavily armed as the enemies crossing the border with the children or the enemies being trained at Quantico.Quote:
There is nothing about a right to 30 shot clips in the constitution.
Your version of the Rosa Parks story is extremely lacking in historical facts and context, and if the Marines at Quantico, your fellow Americans are your enemy then that's pretty delusional. And I fail to see how your guns in your state, in your home, are helping at the border against coyotes.
So the armed forces of the United States are the enemies of the people? sounds like you have regressed 160 years to the days of the confederacy. If your people cared about peopele crossing the border they would take those arms you prize and turn them on the invaders, turns out they think differently to the 1%, whichever 1% that might be, the criminal class, or the rich class, of the rabid red neck class
The Constitution gives the population the RIGHT to own weapons as a failsafe against an out of control president or out of control military to have the means to resist.
Read the Federalist papers, the thoughts and intents of the founding fathers who wrote the constitution and everything is spelled out in them.
We have evolved past the revolution,and civil war dude. We vote and sue. Are you so upset at losing the last election you want to grab a gun? DUDE!
What if you lose the next one too? You must think you have more guns and bullets on your side or something.
Because this last election, in fact the last two elections... have proven we NEED more guns... because its proven a meglomaniac who completely disregaurds the laws, and the cult that follows him protects him when he does it... can steal elections through fraud...and there is no longer an actual independent unbiased media. And hasn't been for far over a decade.
Exactly like happened with Hitler, and Mussilini... and Stalin...
Absolute rubbish smoothy, do you have the gestapo (NSA) rounding up dissidents? Are your local police forces breaking heads and labour strikes? are your students revolting? well yes but that is a different issue. are there large numbers interned for their political views?
lol lol lol lolQuote:
We vote and sue
If you have evolve beyond settling you differences with wars, you have evolved beyond settling your difference with guns, I guess you haven't evolved as far as you think you have
Some rattle sabers, others pump guns in the air. It's a scare tactic, mostly for those who are afraid and feel threatened but want you to be afraid too. Guns are and never were the real problem Clete, as anything in the wrong hands is lethal.
Yes but guns have become the problem tal, they are the weapon of choice
I could spend a whole day on how wrong that is. When you have a segment of society hell-bent on destroying traditional values, such as families, cheapening human life via millions of abortions, undermining parental authority, intentionally stoking racial tensions and otherwise insisting that anything goes EXCEPT respect for the previous things listed, who can be surprised at how perverted and violent it's become? I mean geez, you've got teens running around knocking out unsuspecting victims just for the hell of it. Guns are not the problem.Quote:
Yes but guns have become the problem tal, they are the weapon of choice
Yeah, you guys "never" stoke racial tensions, or accept that your "traditional values" are shared by everyone though you think you can make it so.
That was a hoax and you fell for it... because you want to believe it.Quote:
you've got teens running around knocking out unsuspecting victims just for the hell of it.
Contrary to lib belief, we aren't the ones forcing our values on others, trying to destroy yours, or harboring most of the racists.Quote:
Yeah, you guys "never" stoke racial tensions, or accept that your "traditional values" are shared by everyone though you think you can make it so.
Liberals have as much right to their beliefs as you do so get over it, as you are so fond to say about YOUR rights.
The knock out game is a hoax?Quote:
That was a hoax and you fell for it... because you want to believe it.
Knockout game - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I see an opinion that this is a hoax where I come from teh problem has become so endemic that new laws have been enacted because of deaths from this nonsense a fad that has gone aroound the world and guess what gun carrying didn't protect anyoneQuote:
you've got teens running around knocking out unsuspecting victims just for the hell of it.
The 'knockout game' faux media trend has finally jumped the shark - Los Angeles Times
snopes.com: Knockout Game Turns Deadly
Reports: Alleged trend of 'knockout game' a myth
'Knockout Game' Is A Fabricated Trend, Victim James Addlespurger Says (VIDEO)
Knockout game trend: It's not real, but random street assaults are.
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:37 PM. |