Quote:

---

You watch that debate tonight? *giggle*

---

It was 2 on 1 Vivek and DeSantis attacking Haley . The elephant in the room devoted his time attacking the elephant not in the room .

If there is any other Repub debate in the pursuit of 2nd place then it should be DeSantis and Haley in a round table discussion . Vivek could be a serious candidate if he was a serious candidate . But he is a clown and a troll.



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GAtXBRlX...g&name=900x900

Christie is a 1 trick pony with a grievance against Trump for snubbing him for a position in his cabinet in 2016 .

Christie has no chance and VR has allowed himself to degenerate into a complainer and grumbler rather than proposing solutions. Trump should be there.

The liberal dems have a hatred of Trump such as I've not seen before. When vitriol runs short, then the lies begin. They have such a fear of the man. And this goes on while Biden has been unmasked as a corrupt seller of government influence to foreign government officials. Nothing is said about that.

When vitriol runs short, then the lies begin. They have such a fear of the man.

No one has to lie about Trump. He lays it all out right in front of everyone. Fear him? Hardly! Actually, I miss the Trump who existed during the early "Apprentice" days. He's now a genuine example of how mental illness can affect and destroy someone.

In this morning's Chicago Tribune, a column by Steve Chapman included this:

***The former president has always admired ruthless tyrants, including Vladimir Putin (“genius”), China’s Xi Jinping (“a strong guy, tough guy”) and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un (“We fell in love”). He likes autocrats not in spite of their despotic nature but because of it.

Lately, he has also gone out of his way to emulate them — referring to his political opponents as “vermin,” declaring that Milley deserved to be executed and vowing to shoot shoplifters. In a pitch-perfect echo of Adolf Hitler, he accused migrants of “poisoning the blood of our country.”

Such remarks may be dismissed as nothing more than colorful language from a candidate unbound by stuffy political norms. But his vitriol is meant to create a sense of apocalyptic danger that requires draconian measures.***

Quote:

---

No one has to lie about Trump.

---

Oh? Then why did you? "Trump has no policies except to become the first U.S. king." He has said no such thing and has no such ambition.

The column from the Tribune amounted to little more than picking out isolated, out of context remarks by Trump and then making far too much of them. But it's better than the personal insults you had been engaging in. I'm glad to see you have corrected that.

Your criticisms of Trump would carry more weight if you were an equal-opportunity criticizer. The crime and bribery exploits by Biden go unnoticed by you, so it makes your attacks seem to be solidly partisan.

Oh? Then why did you? "Trump has no policies except to become the first U.S. king." He has said no such thing and has no such ambition.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4SdwYFe8qVk

The crime and bribery exploits by Biden go unnoticed by you, so it makes your attacks seem to be solidly partisan.

Not at all. But Trump's arrogance and desire for total power are the topics on the table right now.

Vivek is all over the news for challenging Nikki to name the 3 " provinces " or "regions "[FONT=TwitterChirp, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, Segoe UI, Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif][COLOR=#0f1419]that she wants to send America’s sons & daughters to die fighting for. (the correct word is "Oblasts " the ones in Novorossiya are [/COLOR][/FONT]Donetsk, Luhansk, and Kharkiv)

Turn around seems to be fair play . So in light of his giving 'Jeopardy ' questions for his fellow candidates to choke on , I would like to ask him in light of the fact that he would end birthright citizenship ;if a son of a man immigrated here and who chose to NOT become an American citizen should be considered a "natural born " citizen ?

He was born here to Indian immigrants who at the time were not American citizens . He has already admitted that his father never became one. So his claim to eligibilty appears to be his status as a birthright citizen , . He's a statutory citizen but not an Article 2 Section 1 natural born Citizen.
But why quibble ?

Quote:

---

Oh? Then why did you? "Trump has no policies except to become the first U.S. king." He has said no such thing and has no such ambition.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4SdwYFe8qVk

The crime and bribery exploits by Biden go unnoticed by you, so it makes your attacks seem to be solidly partisan.

Not at all. But Trump's arrogance and desire for total power are the topics on the table right now.

---

At no place in your link did Trump say he had no policies but to become the king. You would be much better served to learn to be a little honest and simply admit you were wrong. As to what Trump actually DID say, Tom has already dealt with that. Please learn to keep up.

https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showth...94#post3894794

Not at all??? Well, it will be easy enough for you to provide links to where you have leveled those criticisms here. I will wait patiently. If the past is any indicator, I will still be waiting a year from now.

Quote:

---

He was born here to Indian immigrants who at the time were not American citizens . He has already admitted that his father never became one. So his claim to eligibilty appears to be his status as a birthright citizen , . He's a statutory citizen but not an Article 2 Section 1 natural born Citizen.

---

Hmm. I wonder just who that guy might be.

VR at one time seemed to be a serious candidate. Lately, he has become desperate and wants to launch his attacks on primarily Haley.

Trump said he will be a dictator on Day One. I'm guessing that will continue on Day Two, Day Three, and thereafter.

Good ole guesswork.

Like I said earlier, a simple admission that your statement was WRONG would go far towards giving you at least some minimal level of credibility. As it stands, this statement was ridiculous. "Trump has no policies except to become the first U.S. king."

And again. https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showth...94#post3894794

Still waiting to see all those places where you took the Biden admin to task.

DeSantis won the debate IMO when he said men in Iraq wear "man dresses"

Ron Desantis Says People Wore Man Dresses in Iraq and Threatens Violence at The Border #politics - YouTube

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

Good ole guesswork.

Like I said earlier, a simple admission that your statement was WRONG would go far towards giving you at least some minimal level of credibility. As it stands, this statement was ridiculous. "Trump has no policies except to become the first U.S. king."

---

No guesswork is needed. His very presence, gestures, facial expressions, and rambling verbiage say it.

WG. Thank goodness you don’t go in for subjective judgements!!

Tom. I liked the “man dresses” remark too. Nice to see someone not eaten up with wokeness.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

WG. Thank goodness you don’t go in for subjective judgements!!

Tom. I liked the “man dresses” remark too. Nice to see someone not eaten up with wokeness.

---

JL. Thank goodness you don’t go in for subjective judgments!! Especially about the clothing men of other nationalities wear. (Psssst, Jesus and His disciples wore "man dresses" too.)

What subjective judgment did I make?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

What subjective judgment did I make?

---

About Iraqi men.

I said nothing about Iraqi men.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

I said nothing about Iraqi men.

---

You said: Tom. I liked the “man dresses” remark too.

And why did I say I liked it??? Where did I mention Iraqi men???

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

And why did I say I liked it??? Where did I mention Iraqi men???

---

Post #32. Tom's was Post #30.

Please stop making it up as you go along. I am not responsible for what Tom or anyone else says, but even Tom's comment was a simple, objective comment about a statement from the debate.

Post 32 below. There is no mention of Iraqi men at all. And in case someone is reading impaired, I underlined my reasoning for liking the comment. I have no concern at all about how Iraqi men dress.

Quote:

---

WG. Thank goodness you don’t go in for subjective judgements!!

Tom. I liked the “man dresses” remark too. Nice to see someone not eaten up with wokeness.

---

You do this all the time. You get caught red-handed violating your own moralizing, in this case making mean-spirited, hateful comments and subjective judgments, and then rather than simply admit it and move on, you want to falsely accuse others of doing it. It really gets old.