Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

And yet once again, you cannot back up your claims, so you desperately want someone else to do it. No thanks.

---

I posted mine. Yours is apparently based on your bitter and unloving nastiness.

Quote:

---

Simply untrue.

---

You are sooooo out of touch!

Quote:

---

I posted mine. Yours is apparently based on your bitter and unloving nastiness.

---

If you posted yours, then why did you ask me to research it for you? Come on. Try being honest.

Quote:

---

You are sooooo out of touch!

---

Says the lady who has absolutely nothing to back up her claims.

Quote:

---

Yup, safety for environmental reasons (pollution, water contamination, etc.), disturbance of historical and archeological sites, demolition of burial sites, pipeline workers infiltrating both indigenous and Caucasian settlements to rape and rob. What's more important, wealth or humanity?

---

This is just silly. Show us where any of that has happened in the past twenty years. You're still living in the day of the snail darter. And those clever pipeline workers with that "infiltrating" of communities to rob and rape!! Feeling kind of dramatic today?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

If you posted yours, then why did you ask me to research it for you? Come on. Try being honest.

---

The song "Twist and Shout" must have been written with you in mind. Nowhere did I ask you to research it for ME. I was hoping YOU would do some honest research for your own edification.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

And those clever pipeline workers with that "infiltrating" of communities to rob and rape!! Feeling kind of dramatic today?

---

Read up on "man camps".

And why would I want to research it for me? You are the one making the silly claims. Do your own research, if you can. I rather doubt it.

Quote:

---

Read up on "man camps".

---

And again. You make a silly claim, and then ask someone else to research it. What's wrong with you???

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

And why would I want to research it for me? You are the one making the silly claims. Do your own research, if you can. I rather doubt it.

And again. You make a silly claim, and then ask someone else to research it. What's wrong with you???

---

I never realized you are so afraid to learn the truth. If I had given you links, you would have (and have in the past) spit on them. Do your own research.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wondergirl

Read up on "man camps".

---

I did that. Anybody interested should do the same.

Quote:

---

I never realized you are so afraid to learn the truth. If I had given you links, you would have (and have in the past) spit on them. Do your own research.

---

One more time. I will not do your research for you. If you post something sensible, it will be acknowledged as such. If you post nothing, that will be treated differently as well it should be. If you post silliness, such as suggesting that trucks should replace pipelines, then that will be noted as well.

Up to you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

One more time. I will not do your research for you.

---

I posted my source. You haven't supported anything you've posted.

Quote:

---

If you post something sensible, it will be acknowledged as such.

---

By whose standards?

Quote:

---

If you post nothing, that will be treated differently as well it should be. If you post silliness, such as suggesting that trucks should replace pipelines, then that will be noted as well.

Up to you.

---

I posted, supported it with a reference, whereas you're just babbling on and on. Who's the silly one?

seems like a job for police

Quote:

---

Yup, safety for environmental reasons (pollution, water contamination, etc.), disturbance of historical and archeological sites, demolition of burial sites, pipeline workers infiltrating both indigenous and Caucasian settlements to rape and rob. What's more important, wealth or humanity?

---

You have posted nothing to support any of that. You have posted nothing to support your idea that trucks should replace pipelines. You made a referenece to Wikipedia concerning Keystone. That's fine, but there has been nothing to support what I've talked about above. You have done nothing but tell everyone but WG to look it up on the internet such as, "Put on your google hat and do some honest research." Then you claimed you haven't asked me to do your research. Then you claimed you posted your source. And on and on it goes.

Are you always this confused?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

Are you always this confused?

---

Always, always, always a putdown.

It was ALL from the Wikipedia article. Had there been other references, I would have posted links.

Quote:

---

Always, always, always a putdown.

---

You mean, you mean, you mean like this? "...whereas you're just babbling on and on. Who's the silly one?"

Quote:

---

Had there been other references, I would have posted links.

---

You didn't post any links at all. None. Zero. Nada. You just made a vague reference to a Wikipedia article.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

You mean like this? "...whereas you're just babbling on and on. Who's the silly one?"

---

Oh no. I've caught your disease!

Quote:

---

You didn't post any links at all. None.

---

I posted Wikipedia in parentheses after a paragraph about the pipeline. My following comments were from that same article. You would have noticed that had you bothered to read the article.

I had to find the article since you posted no link. I saw nothing to confirm your assertions. Perhaps you can provide the relevant quotes?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

I had to find the article since you posted no link. I saw nothing to confirm your assertions. Perhaps you can provide the relevant quotes?

---

If you read the article, you read my comments.

Fraid not.

Read the article. Your comments, however, seemed to be strangely absent.

I do. You don’t.

It’s difficult. All of your multiple sources and references are so lengthy. (Sarcasm meter on overload).

Yep. Frustrated because she does not know how to provide sources. Try this link. Just right click it and it will take you to that site. Not literally, you understand, but digitally. Keep working at it. You're making progress. Well not really, but I do want to be as encouraging as possible.

https://scholar.google.com/