Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

As to the Post Office, they signed a two day delivery contract with Amazon that has stretched them to the limit.

---

Trump hates Bezos because Bezos is richer!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wondergirl

trump hates bezos because bezos is richer!

---

lololol

or it could be because Bezos owns the rag Washington Compost which never reports fairly on Trump ,and has been the point for the 'resistance '

There was enough evidence for a judge to issue an injunction to reverse all tactics that lead to a slowdown of the mail.

yawn the left creates the crisis and then projects it onto someone else . If we had the most timely delivery system imagined it would not prevent the coming chaos because the States are not prepared to implement the decisions re mail in voting they made . When those primaries took almost a month to count ;no one said it was because the mail wasn't delivered on time .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomder55

yawn the left creates the crisis and then projects it onto someone else . If we had the most timely delivery system imagined it would not prevent the coming chaos because the States are not prepared to implement the decisions re mail in voting they made . When those primaries took almost a month to count ;no one said it was because the mail wasn't delivered on time .

---

You know for a progressive nation, no, progressive is the wrong word, developed nation, it seems you struggle to get the simplest things right. Could it be your emphasis on minimum wages for simple tasks means that if you pay peanuts you get monkeys, or in other words the quality just isn't there. Counting votes doesn't require much, just diligence and integrity and enough people to get the job done quickly. It isn't that you don't have a vast pool of unemployed, it may be they just arn't available. The electoral process is one you have had many years to perfect, and yet you speak of votes not being counted on time. The logistics apparently escape you. Could it be you have just too many elections and this is electoral fatigue, too many officials to be elected, too much attention divided from the important issue of getting the job of governing the country done

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomder55

yawn the left creates the crisis and then projects it onto someone else . If we had the most timely delivery system imagined it would not prevent the coming chaos because the States are not prepared to implement the decisions re mail in voting they made . When those primaries took almost a month to count ;no one said it was because the mail wasn't delivered on time .

---

Nice spin as usual. We haven't created a crisis. The dufus has, like all the other crisis of chaos and confusion he has created.

spin ? The Dems have been constructing their narrative for some time now.I posted the findings of a 'war game ' conducted in June by the Transition Integrity Project that studied what would actually happen if the results were contested or not known for weeks after Election Day. They published their finding this month .
https://paxsims.files.wordpress.com/...ion-8-3-20.pdf

Heavy Democrat weighed polls showed Quid with insurmountable leads . That only worked for some time . The pollsters don't want to get burned like they did in 2016 . So the margins have shrunk to the margin of error. They don't want to appear to be like Baghdad Bob again.

So the left shifted the narrative to say that the election won't be decided on Nov 3.And even though Trump will appear to have won ;they should wait weeks for all these mail in ballots to be counted .

Then just like in 2016 they started floating the narrative that Trump won't accept defeat WHEN he loses . It has gone to such absurd lengths to suggest they will need the assistance of the US military to forcibly evict him.

They have also given out the beneficial effects of a delayed decision .How they ultimately get the Presidency by stalling past Jan 20 . Absent a clear winner of the presidential election on Jan 20, the Speaker of the House would serve as Acting President under the current succession law.

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?...edition=prelim

It is all so predictable. There will be at least one "story" a week, characterized in many quarters as "breaking news". It will quietly be thoroughly refuted (refer to the Atlantic article), and any thinking person will accept that, only to be assaulted again mere days later by some other supposedly earth-shattering revelation. It is the hope of those in the liberal media, which is most of the media, that they can provide, not a steady "drip, drip", but rather a constant torrent of stories to make voting for Trump seem to be absurd. You certainly see it here. The story about the 100 shrinks who said Trump was mentally ill. Unable to name any of them, that was then inflated to include every psych on the earth. Or the challenge to name 10 Trump negatives to match 10 positives. See how far that went. The silly contention that a vaccine would not be ready until April which was disproven by the very article which was linked. Or all the scientists who supposedly claimed Trump was guilty of murdering people with the Covid virus.

At some point, something thrown against the wall will have to stick. References to "right-wing loons" doesn't get much done.

LOL, like repubs never play silly election tricks or talk crazy conspiracy stuff. That's not even good spin.

1. Which current tricks or "crazy conspiracy stuff" are your referring to?
2. I wasn't really referring to dems. I was more making a reference to the liberal press who can scarcely conceal their glee at the prospect of an ultra-liberal administration.

Like the conservative press isn't head over heels about the dufus. Your first question is covered amply in this forum so no need for repetition.

Quote:

---

Your first question is covered amply in this forum so no need for repetition.

---

What has now become the boringly predictive response. "Oh, I've already covered all of that. You know, back a month ago. Just go back and look it up."

Yeah. Right.

I was referring to them all and of course there are many. I've blasted the dufus for most and you've blasted me for being wrong so take your pick. Whatever your favorite one is. Unnamed named sources...up to you. I can only point out that a lot of prominent establishment conservative repubs are switching their votes, publicly and even running commercials.

The dufus cult isn't that popular nor a majority, unlike Obama, who won with a majority twice. He couldn't have been nearly as bad as you say. Even HC didn't lose nearly as bad as you guys make it out to be, and she didn't have Vlad helping her.

You're really gonna need Vlad again. The right wing noise machine may not be loud enough.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by talaniman

You're really gonna need Vlad again. The right wing noise machine may not be loud enough.

---

The left has taken a leaf out of Vlad's book and tried to poison Trump. Maybe Trump does need Vlad to counter the dirty tricks

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paraclete

The left has taken a leaf out of Vlad's book and tried to poison Trump. Maybe Trump does need Vlad to counter the dirty tricks

---

The right has taken brain cells out of your skull.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Athos

The right has taken brain cells out of your skull.

---

I don't need brain cells to understand that the losers will stop at nothing

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paraclete

I don't need brain cells to understand that the losers will stop at nothing

---

Who's losing?

Yet to be tested but he who commands media attention is undoubtedly leading

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paraclete

I don't need brain cells to understand that the losers will stop at nothing

---

You don't think winners use dirty tricks to keep what they won...by using dirty tricks?