Here's the question you continue to evade.
Which one is true - Matthew's passage or God's love? Both can't be true. Would an unconditionally loving God cast his creatures into his personal torture chamber for all eternity simply because they never heard of or believed in Jesus? Of course not!
Here's your non-answer.
NOTE: There's no answer there in your "answer". Only in your foggy mind is that an answer. You skated around, talking Bible and Jesus and then saying "It is now obvious to everyone here that your ideas are just that...your ideas". OBVIOUS? TO EVERYONE HERE? Where's the answer? My ideas are just that - my ideas. Wow, how long did it take you to come up with that one about my ideas being my ideas? BRILLIANT!
I'll make it even simpler for you. Drop unconditional love. It's not critical to the question. Plain old "love" will do. Is that easier for you?Quote:
But I'll make your life simple for you.
I have just explained to you that it has NOT been answered. Then I made it easier for you since you are so hung up on the word "unconditional". Another semantic roadblock you love so well to delay and deflect.Quote:
You are asking how I think Mt. 25 fits into your idea of God's unconditional love, and it has just been answered.
I don't need a Bible to describe love - unconditional or otherwise. It's a pretty common term. If you're confused about it, google it. Oh, I forgot, you don't google.Quote:
But you haven't been able at all to describe your version of unconditional love from the Bible.
You're a master at delaying an answer to a simple question. I wonder why?Quote:
OK, let's go even more basic. Simply tell what unconditional love means to you. It's a term in your question, so it would be logical for you to simply describe it.
"Tis a consummation, devoutly to be wished"Quote:
I'll wait...probably forever.