Quote:

---

Originally Posted by excon

Hello again, smoothy:

Nahhh... I only caught Bush saying there were NO WMD's.. He really did, smoothy.. Here's HIM saying it.

excon

---

Pull up the ones with John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Ried and Hillary Clinton saying there was... Obama was in a crack house stoned at the time and didn't know where he was that week.

You are aware they all get the same security breifings... just a little bit after the WHite house gets them... Unlike in the Obama administration... they don't originate from the Oval orifice.

Hello again, Steve:

Quote:

---

how many times do you have to be reminded that everyone was in agreement on Iraq's WMDs before it sinks in?

---

Here's the deal.. It matters NOT what the whole word believed. It only matters if it was the TRUTH. And, it clearly was NOT.

I'd like to know WHO dropped the ball. You? Not so much.

Excon

We already know... there was no ball dropped... there were WMD's. THe WMD's were moved...

After all Saddam had them... admitted to having them... and there is documented proof of him having used them against the Kurds... or is that bit of fact too inconvienient for your fantasy?

5,000 Kurds in Halabja in Iraq died from Saddams "non-existant" chemical weapons

Hello again, smoothy:

Quote:

---

or is that bit of fact too inconvienient for your fantasy?

---

Seems to me, that IF the WMD's were moved, George W. Bush would be sounding like YOU on that video. It's HIS legacy, after all. But, he doesn't. He doesn't even SUGGEST it. You don't think he would if he could??

So, which words coming out of Bush's mouth don't you believe? Or is the video a George Sorros trick?

Excon

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by excon

Hello again, Steve:

Here's the deal.. It matters NOT what the whole word believed. It only matters if it was the TRUTH. And, it clearly was NOT.

I'd like to know WHO dropped the ball. You? Not so much.

excon

---

Oh but it does matter, especially that agency whose ineptness I've mentioned many times that was charged with verifying, the United Nations. You're singularly focused on blaming Bush/Cheney while giving everyone else a pass, why do they deserve a pass?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by excon

Hello again, smoothy:

Seems to me, that IF the WMD's were moved, George W. Bush would be sounding like YOU on that video. It's HIS legacy, after all. But, he doesn't. He doesn't even SUGGEST it. You don't think he would if he could???

So, which words coming out of Bush's mouth don't you believe?? Or is the video a George Sorros trick?

excon

---

There are reasons... some of them having to do with stuff that was classified at the moment. And then because of people like you that wouldn't believe it if he took you to them and showed them to you.

Ever agree with your wife before even when you really didn't just to shut her up? Same thing.. same reasoning.

Hello again, Steve:

It's EITHER Bush/Cheney OR the CIA. It can only be ONE or the OTHER. I'm HAPPY to find out the bad guy, or the INEPT guy is the CIA.

I have NO DOG in this fight. I'm NOT here to BLAME anyone. I'm here to find out the TRUTH, so we don't get blindsided by the same people again. What's wrong with the TRUTH??

excon

PS> I guess it could be Barney Franks fault. I didn't think of that.

There was no reason for Bush to fight that battle anymore. Either you believed they were there or you thought he lied. He was not going to convince anyone either way and there were more challenging things to deal with in Iraq by that time.
Britannia Radio: Wikileaks Documents:Saddam's WMD Program Existed in Iraq (Note we reported the transfer of WMD's to Lebanon/Syria - at least 5 years ago and ignored

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by excon

Hello again, Steve:

It's EITHER Bush/Cheney OR the CIA. It can only be ONE or the OTHER. I'm HAPPY to find out the bad guy, or the INEPT guy is the CIA.

I have NO DOG in this fight. I'm NOT here to BLAME anyone. I'm here to find out the TRUTH, so we don't get blindsided by the same people again. What's wrong with the TRUTH???

excon

PS> I guess it could be Barney Franks fault. I didn't think of that.

---

The White house doesn't generate the security briefing... they are just the first people to get it followed by the leaders and security commitees of the Senate and congress followed by the rest of congress. Then select other groups.

I was a regular recipient of it in the past... though be it low on the totem pole.

Hello again,

Being the curious fellow that I am, I wonder WHO made sure, in Colin Powell's speech to the UN, that he SAID there were Iraqi mobile chemical labs.. It wasn't true! You should wonder too, since this 4,000 times WORSE than Benghazi.

ONE guy said that. Curveball was his name. I don't know how much he was paid to say that, but he LIED. And, he SAYS he lied. There was NO corroboration.. There was nobody else. Just one guy and his story.. Yet, it was ONE of the reasons cited for our invasion. And, it was WRONG.

Aren't YOU curious too, as to HOW it got into Powell's speech? Now, I don't know about you, but I don't think the CIA all by itself would BELIEVE ONE guy's statements.. If so, they're NOT spooks, they're REPORTERS...

I'd like to know if our CIA is SLOOTHING, or REPORTING.. I'd think YOU'D want to know that stuff too. No, huh?

excon

Obama used the same Excuses... you are aware we have troops in Africa... for exactly what reason other then he is a Kenyan.. and Africa thinks the world owes them everything.

CNN.com - U.S.: Mobile labs found in Iraq - Apr. 15, 2003

"We didn't just make them up one night. Those were eyewitness accounts of people who had worked in the program and knew it was going on, multiple accounts. 'Oh, it was a hydrogen-making thing for balloons.' No, there's no question in my mind what it was designed for."Colin Powell.

Clinton got the same security briefings as well through both his terms that showed they existed... didn't hear him claiming BS because of party propaganda. And you don't hear the lefties going after him.. which shows their true colors... and its not about facts but invented propaganda.

Hello again, tom:

Nobody is denying that he HAD chemical weapons.. The question is, did he have them when Curveball SAID he had them.

These were buried in the ground... Who knows how long?

excon

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by excon

Hello again, Steve:

It's EITHER Bush/Cheney OR the CIA. It can only be ONE or the OTHER. I'm HAPPY to find out the bad guy, or the INEPT guy is the CIA.

I have NO DOG in this fight. I'm NOT here to BLAME anyone. I'm here to find out the TRUTH, so we don't get blindsided by the same people again. What's wrong with the TRUTH???

excon

PS> I guess it could be Barney Franks fault. I didn't think of that.

---

Personally I think you're just trying to distract from the current coverup.

Obama sold them to Syria... where do you think he got all his money from?

Obama is responsible for Benghazi... and if he had a soul or a conscience he would not be sleeping at night because of it.

Hello again, smoothy:

I don't know 4,000 dead Americans vs. 4 dead Americans... You want to know about the 4, but not the 4,000... Boy, oh boy. Right wing math surely doesn't work.

excon

Liberals aren't capable of understanding...

Again... an attack on an Embassy before you even kill the Embassador and anally rape him... is an act of war...


Sadam Hussien Barrack Hussiens second cousin, was repeatedly violating a cease fire agreement... for a war that never actually ended yet at the time.

Need a contemprory reference... the Korean War... it ended exactly on what date? Right... it didn't because there is a cease fire agreement... just like there was in Iraq.

I don't care if it is 4 or 4000, I do know that Dems vowed to investigate the hell out of Bush but once Obama got in office that all seems to have went away, why is that? Meanwhile, there's a coverup right now and like the media you don't seems to give a damn.

Nobody even got a paper cut during Watergate and look how many decades the lefties have had their panties in a knot about that...