Please list your reasons why the government "should not" force people to take the vaccination(s).Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
|
Please list your reasons why the government "should not" force people to take the vaccination(s).Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Why? Are you in favor of it?
Wait! I asked YOU a question. And I get no answer plus two questions in return.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Correct. It’s called the Wondergirl approach.
What question of yours haven't I answered? (P.S. I don't cherry-pick Bible verses to prove my point.)Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
You do it all the time. The most recent would be the two questions you just passed on.
And you still haven’t learned that posting a boatload of scriptures is not, to a thinking person, cherry picking.
I asked you first (to simplify the unanswered question Athos had asked you) to make a list. You walked across that before giving it a swift kick down the alley and asked me TWO questions.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
I am not going to play "Proof Passages -- Mine Are Better!" and "Bible Bingo" with you.Quote:
And you still haven’t learned that posting a boatload of scriptures is not, to a thinking person, cherry picking.
You didn't answer. I didn't answer. So?Quote:
I asked you first (to simplify the unanswered question Athos had asked you) to make a list. You walked across that before giving it a swift kick down the alley and asked me TWO questions.
And there's the difference. It's serious with me. It's more of a game with you, so you just laugh it off and move on. That's why you can't reply.Quote:
I am not going to play "Proof Passages -- Mine Are Better!" and "Bible Bingo" with you.
Athos asked first. You refused to answer. I rephrased his question and simplified it. You refused to respond. BECAUSE. You knew you couldn't give an honest answer without getting beat up.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
The game is one you invented. No matter what fantastically perfect verses I throw out, you will post piecemeal, out-of-context "proofs" that my verses weren't good enough. That is not how one reads the Bible and discusses it.Quote:
And there's the difference. It's serious with me. It's more of a game with you, so you just laugh it off and move on. That's why you can't reply.
So why didn't you answer? Honor??? (sarcasm meter pegged for the sarcasm limited among us)Quote:
You knew you couldn't give an honest answer without getting beat up.
You don't provide verses other than the two most recent ones, neither of which specifically supported your contention and were about as far away from "fantastically perfect" as one can imagine.Quote:
The game is one you invented. No matter what fantastically perfect verses I throw out, you will post piecemeal, out-of-context "proofs" that my verses weren't good enough. That is not how one reads the Bible and discusses it.
You call it games like "Bible bingo". I don't see it that way. It's serious, as I said, to me.
Nooooooo! It was YOUR turn to answer!Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Serious to you??? What? The competition part??? You aren't open-minded and willing to learn. You want to WIN! and beat down your opponent.Quote:
You call it games like "Bible bingo". I don't see it that way. It's serious, as I said, to me.
Not in my view.Quote:
Nooooooo! It was YOUR turn to answer!
I am interested in the truth. You follow such wild tales as Jesus having a homosexual lover and Paul being a homosexual because it better suits your political and social views.Quote:
Serious to you??? What? The competition part??? You aren't open-minded and willing to learn. You want to WIN! and beat down your opponent.
Nope. You've shown us many times you aren't -- are interested only in YOUR truth.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
What is truth, it is in the eye of the beholder, Pilate saw the truth and still condemned Jesus
You're confusing truth with beauty.Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
I am not interested in a perverted truth about homosexual lovers. Jesus said He WAS the truth so I go with His words.
True. I think he was afeared of the Truth...washing his hands?Quote:
What is truth, it is in the eye of the beholder, Pilate saw the truth and still condemned Jesus
Honestly WG? It appears as if you declared War. Either you've had Homosexual experience and think you'll be alright, not confessing, or you're mad at God for taking your loved ones away, or both?. It's OK to be upset with God. You continually contradict yourself. I think JL is genuinely interested in the truth. You have your truth and that's just it- YOUR TRUTH!Quote:
Nope. You've shown us many times you aren't -- are interested only in YOUR truth.
It appears as if you take everything that you read concerning the Bible at face Value?
Wow! You might just have the chops to become a bestselling fiction writer!Quote:
Originally Posted by waltero
Evasive answer.
No beauty is only skin deep and fades with age, truth is eternal, but often ignoredQuote:
Originally Posted by Athos
Huh? About what?Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Then why did you say truth is only subjective, not eternal? Your actual words were "truth is in the eye of the beholder". The phrase you misquoted is about beauty, not truth. Don't bother replying. You shouldn't embarrass yourself any further.Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
Well, walter, you show up and start with the nastiness immediately. Is this how Christians are to behave? This website is doing you no good. Best depart or start over with a nod to your self-proclaimed faith.Quote:
Originally Posted by waltero
I'm up for it if you are? I'll start right away, just need to record 'Your Truth'...Fiction at it's finest.Quote:
Wow! You might just have the chops to become a bestselling fiction writer!
I was thinking of posting all the times you've contradicted yourself. You are in extreme danger! Stop with this Holy-homosexual dribble.
Come on, You guys are always brutal (with each other)! What's nasty about it, Homosexual activity? I'm telling it how I see it. I have a hard time understanding where WG is coming from half the time. I say something and her immediate response in always- Nope!, Nooo! and then I say the same "exact thing" later on and she says thank you for post, I enjoyed it??? She is clearly closed minded! [And] For her to say JL is closed minded, pffft!Quote:
you show up and start with the nastiness immediately.
Athos, have you been told today? consider yourself toldQuote:
Originally Posted by Athos
Another non-reply from you. You ARE consistent.Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
You see that as permission to be the same? Following the herd is not usually the Christian thing to do. Courage, young Walter.Quote:
Originally Posted by waltero
What's nasty about it, Homosexual activity? Enlighten me please, what do you consider Nasty? Forget it!
Point being, I see it as WG, having a closed mind, when she herself declares JL as having a closed mind.
Her first response is always the same- NO! NOOO! NO, try again etc.! Doesn't even read the Topic, or post, it's simply NOOOOOO!You tell me.Quote:
Is this how Christians are to behave?
POINT referred to this from you ------Quote:
Originally Posted by waltero
Quote:
https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/images...quote_icon.png Originally Posted by waltero https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/images...post-right.png
The SSA estimates that it made about $7.9 billion worth of improper payments in total during the 2019 fiscal year.
Quote:
Your point?
Be glad to.Quote:
You tell me. {RE CHRISTIAN BEHAVIOR}
Replying to WG should be in line with your previous rather lengthy sermons-in-words here. I have no objection to those but I think you should practice what you preach.
Her statements are tantamount to sacrilege. I don't think she understands what she's saying. It is not going to end well if she continues with such talk. It would be harmful to practice what she preaches!
You have me confused, my reply was specific, but a little too subtle for youQuote:
Originally Posted by Athos
Your reply was anything but specific. It was "consider yourself told". That was not subtle - it was meaningless. If it's an Australian idiom, enlighten us.Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
Now you're sounding like a Pharisee.Quote:
Originally Posted by waltero
What does that mean? Who are you to judge?Quote:
It is not going to end well if she continues with such talk.
That was meant for you, not her.Quote:
It would be harmful to practice what she preaches!
You were asked some serious questions, and you responded with silliness about becoming a writer of fiction. That's what you claim to dislike, and yet you do it constantly.Quote:
Huh? About what?
It is a polite way of saying, "expletive deleted" offQuote:
Originally Posted by Athos
That's not very subtle, is it?Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
In any case, that's not much of a reply to the charge that you confused truth and beauty. I trust your fellow Aussies are a bit more straightforward and don't hide behind "expletives deleted".
I, and my fellow aussies just get a little sick of hearing some arguments and feel that sometimes some need to be remindedQuote:
Originally Posted by Athos
To be truthful, Athos was correct in his observation.Quote:
In any case, that's not much of a reply to the charge that you confused truth and beauty.
Both you and Athos are confused, I said beauty was not eternal and that truth is but I know you love to argue, tell me which way is the wind blowing?
That is not at all what you said; it's not even close. I posted it above just so you can be reminded. That is what Athos responded to where you claimed truth was, "in the eye of the beholder". I can't imagine you meant it, so if anyone was confused, it was you.Quote:
What is truth, it is in the eye of the beholder,
Another instance of your poor comprehension. I said this to waltero: "Wow! You might just have the chops to become a bestselling fiction writer!"Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Waltero's "questions" were silly, even ridiculous, and not worth answering.
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:34 PM. |