Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Current Events (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=486)
-   -   Trump's Border Wall Paid by Mexico (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=842470)

  • Apr 15, 2019, 10:59 AM
    Wondergirl
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by waltero View Post
    Forty Years ago there were no "others".

    There have always been others.
    Quote:

    Let me rephrase that: recurring abortions.
    If only the guys would keep their pants zipped up...
    Quote:

    What is the governing force behind abortion?
    Money, More Money, lies, deceit etc.
    No, desperation.

    Quote:

    Having a (first time) abortion isn't like going to the Dentist. Before, during and after there are going to be some strong emotions...feel good moment? It's not so much the abortion itself...
    Quote:


    "Declaring" abortion as right is wrong.

    Can it ever be right?
  • Apr 15, 2019, 11:32 AM
    waltero
    Quote:

    There have always been others.
    "Others" who? Those who haven't had an abortion, "others" who've had multiple abortions, "others" who perform Abortions. My point; nobody goes through an abortion without some form of sorrow, feeling of wrong doing...REGARDLESS OF THE LAW (Law or no law).

    Quote:

    If only the guys would keep their pants zipped up...

    Fact of the matter still remains...

    Quote:

    What is the governing force behind abortion?
    Money, More Money, lies, deceit etc.

    Edit: What is the governing force behind the abortion industry?
    Quote:

    "Declaring" abortion as right is wrong.
    Can it ever be right?





    Who needs it to be?

    I'm told it can be made right through repentance.


  • Apr 15, 2019, 11:38 AM
    Wondergirl
    Quote:

    If only the guys would keep their pants zipped up...
    Quote:

    Fact of the matter still remains...
    Nope, not if the guys kept their pants zipped up. Let's start a movement to bring that about.
  • Apr 15, 2019, 11:44 AM
    jlisenbe
    Strange how you always want to target the men only. If you want to start a movement, then start a movement for everyone to keep their pants zipped up. Besides, it is not the man who stands to suffer the most when a woman becomes pregnant, it is the woman. I would like for my neighbor to keep his door locked at night, but I am more concerned about my own door since I am the one at risk in that case. Women need to learn some wisdom. Insist on a ring.
  • Apr 15, 2019, 11:54 AM
    waltero
    Quote:

    not if the guys kept their pants zipped up. Let's start a movement to bring that about

    Male chastity belt, are on the incline.
  • Apr 15, 2019, 12:08 PM
    Wondergirl
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jlisenbe View Post
    Strange how you always want to target the men only. If you want to start a movement, then start a movement for everyone to keep their pants zipped up. Besides, it is not the man who stands to suffer the most when a woman becomes pregnant, it is the woman. I would like for my neighbor to keep his door locked at night, but I am more concerned about my own door since I am the one at risk in that case. Women need to learn some wisdom. Insist on a ring.

    There's no baby if the man keeps his pants zipped up. If you're worried about your door being locked, that is parallel to staying zipped up. Locked up, zipped up. Then nothing bad happens. Why does a women have to be at risk? And when she says no, she's too often ignored.
  • Apr 15, 2019, 01:26 PM
    jlisenbe
    Quote:

    And when she says no, she's too often ignored.
    That's called rape and is a felony.

    You can keep making excuses if you want to, but the bottom line is this. It's the woman who stands to suffer when she gets pregnant out of wedlock. We need to tell young women that the only sure way to avoid that is to avoid sex. Men certainly have a part to play, but men understand all too well that they will not be the one getting pregnant. Is that scummy? Sure it is, and I'm all for challenging men to be more responsible, but men still don't get pregnant. At the very least a woman must be sure that contraceptives of some sort are being used. She is the one at risk, just like my door is my responsibility.
  • Apr 15, 2019, 01:49 PM
    Wondergirl
    Quote:

    You can keep making excuses if you want to, but the bottom line is this. It's the woman who stands to suffer when she gets pregnant out of wedlock. We need to tell young women that the only sure way to avoid that is to avoid sex. Men certainly have a part to play, but men understand all too well that they will not be the one getting pregnant. Is that scummy? Sure it is, and I'm all for challenging men to be more responsible, but men still don't get pregnant. At the very least a woman must be sure that contraceptives of some sort are being used. She is the one at risk, just like my door is my responsibility.
    And men will listen carefully to those women and agree.

    And no, not rape. Sweet talking, gentle caressing, whispered promises in a dark and solitary and probably romantic location and the fact that girls/women have always been taught to defer to the male are amazingly convincing.

    Don't men know how women get pregnant??? If so, then don't do it!!! Or are you saying she has to be the responsible one because she has the uterus...
  • Apr 15, 2019, 02:38 PM
    paraclete
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    .

    Don't men know how women get pregnant??? If so, then don't do it!!! Or are you saying she has to be the responsible one because she has the uterus...

    That would seem to be the case
  • Apr 15, 2019, 03:28 PM
    talaniman
    Why don't guys at least buy a woman a morning after pill? Just in case she didn't. More effective than hauling a rubber around in our wallets.

    No abortions, no unwanted pregnancy, everybody happy...problem solved(?)!
  • Apr 15, 2019, 04:38 PM
    waltero
    God has been taken out of the picture, we're hosed.
  • Apr 15, 2019, 04:49 PM
    Wondergirl
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by waltero View Post
    God has been taken out of the picture, we're hosed.

    All the God-loving males who respect women will not make any sexual moves on them.
  • Apr 15, 2019, 04:56 PM
    talaniman
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by waltero View Post
    God has been taken out of the picture, we're hosed.

    Just keep God in YOUR equations and you will be okay.
  • Apr 15, 2019, 05:33 PM
    jlisenbe
    Quote:

    And no, not rape. Sweet talking, gentle caressing, whispered promises in a dark and solitary and probably romantic location and the fact that girls/women have always been taught to defer to the male are amazingly convincing.
    Yeah. And you know how women are. Simple-minded. Undisciplined. Emotionally unstable. I mean, we just have to treat them like the children they are. We must take care of them since they plainly cannot take care of themselves. Thanks for reminding us of these things, that they certainly, in your world, are not capable of engaging in wise behavior.

    Quote:

    Just keep God in YOUR equations and you will be okay.
    Very true!
  • Apr 15, 2019, 06:04 PM
    Wondergirl
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jlisenbe View Post
    Yeah. And you know how women are. Simple-minded. Undisciplined. Emotionally unstable. I mean, we just have to treat them like the children they are. We must take care of them since they plainly cannot take care of themselves. Thanks for reminding us of these things, that they certainly, in your world, are not capable of engaging in wise behavior.

    Isn't that what you claim the Bible says? Men are the caretakers and the strong, godly ones who keep their pants zipped until the wedding night.
  • Apr 15, 2019, 06:11 PM
    jlisenbe
    Quote:

    Isn't that what you claim the Bible says? Men are the caretakers and the strong, godly ones who keep their pants zipped until the wedding night.
    No. It's the very plain inference of your ideas that women cannot resist the advances of men.

    Isn't it strange that I am the one who is convinced that women are fully capable of behaving wisely and not you? You just lost your membership in the Feminists of American club.
  • Apr 15, 2019, 06:23 PM
    Wondergirl
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jlisenbe View Post
    No. It's the very plain inference of your ideas that women cannot resist the advances of men.

    Or men can't control themselves?
    Quote:

    Isn't it strange that I am the one who is convinced that women are fully capable of behaving wisely and not you? You just lost your membership in the Feminists of American club.
    I was simply quoting you. I didn't divulge MY convictions. Mine are well known where it counts.
  • Apr 15, 2019, 07:22 PM
    jlisenbe
    Quote:

    I was simply quoting you. I didn't divulge MY convictions. Mine are well known where it counts.
    About as untrue a statement as I have seen in a long time. You did not quote me, and you stated your convictions quite well. Yours are certainly well known now. Your statements of the last eight or ten posts are very clear.
  • Apr 15, 2019, 08:28 PM
    Wondergirl
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jlisenbe View Post
    About as untrue a statement as I have seen in a long time. You did not quote me, and you stated your convictions quite well. Yours are certainly well known now. Your statements of the last eight or ten posts are very clear.

    Yup! Men hate to hear the word no.
  • Apr 16, 2019, 08:16 AM
    jlisenbe
    And women, in your view, are incapable of saying it.
  • Apr 16, 2019, 08:45 AM
    Wondergirl
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jlisenbe View Post
    And women, in your view, are incapable of saying it.

    Men have been blaming women since the Garden of Eden: "And the man said, 'The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.'" I.e., He cudda just told her "No, thanks."
  • Apr 16, 2019, 09:42 AM
    jlisenbe
    Perhaps we can settle this with two simple statements. Most men understand what "no" means and should honor that. Most women are quite capable of saying "no" and making it stand. So perhaps we should both simply agree to encourage women to say "no" and men to understand that "no" means "no". We can then take a stand that marriage is the only appropriate and safe place for sex.

    Deal?
  • Apr 16, 2019, 09:46 AM
    Wondergirl
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jlisenbe View Post
    Perhaps we can settle this with two simple statements. Most men understand what "no" means and should honor that. Most women are quite capable of saying "no" and making it stand. So perhaps we should both simply agree to encourage women to say "no" and men to understand that "no" means "no". We can then take a stand that marriage is the only appropriate and safe place for sex.

    Deal?

    That's been tried. Abstinence education doesn't work. Now what?
  • Apr 16, 2019, 09:48 AM
    jlisenbe
    Forget it.
  • Apr 16, 2019, 09:57 AM
    waltero
    Quote:

    Men have been blaming women since the Garden of Eden: "And the man said, 'The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.'" I.e., He cudda just told her "No, thanks."


    She handed it to him after she was eating it all seductive like. Of course she was (being a woman and all) deceitful in handing him a piece of fruit. She Grabbed a piece off the tree of good and Evil and stood in front of another tree when she handed it off to him. Adam had no Idea she handed him a piece of fruit from the forbidden tree! Yah, Yah that's it. Eve was a sly one.
  • Apr 16, 2019, 10:07 AM
    waltero
    Quote:

    We can then take a stand that marriage is the only appropriate and safe place for sex.
    That's been tried, doesn't work. Now what?



    Seemed to have worked longer than anything else. The game has changed and the Players don't believe in rules.
  • Apr 16, 2019, 12:10 PM
    talaniman
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by waltero View Post




    Seemed to have worked longer than anything else. The game has changed and the Players don't believe in rules.

    Half the marriages in America end in divorce, and multiple divorces is not unusual, as in the dufus and his 3 wives. Is that the example that works so well and he cheated on them all? Marriage has not proven to be a silver bullet against flawed human nature nor abortions which is as old as marriage itself.
  • Apr 16, 2019, 12:43 PM
    jlisenbe
    Quote:

    Marriage has not proven to be a silver bullet against flawed human nature nor abortions which is as old as marriage itself.
    It worked well for centuries. Perfectly? No. Nothing does that, but it is still true that when marriage was held in high esteem, divorce was much less common as were abortions. The destruction of the family unit has been a disaster.
  • Apr 16, 2019, 01:42 PM
    talaniman
    Hmm maybe it worked well when women were more submissive, barefoot and pregnant. They seem to have gotten more independent over the years and unwilling to stay in bad marriages. In case you haven't noticed things have changed and not just the institution of marriage. People have changed and not just the females. Abortions are declining maybe not fast enough but steadily. Girls just are not wanting to be their mothers because kids do see the wrong examples in dysfunctional marriages and it's more profound. Humans are complicated with complicated lives and issues and it's easy to trade love and commitment for a short lived feel good. Even easier with no baggage to look for the next adventure. Hey it was acceptable in the old days for men to cat around and women sit home to forgive them, and more and more women are saying screw that I can have a life outside the home too, and find love in all the wrong places.

    You thumpers didn't date much before you were married did you? There was and always will be more than one kind of woman, just as there is and always will be more than one kind of man. We agree though that it's the women who get pregnant and NOT the men and it's the women who decides what to do about her pregnancy, not the men. It's always been that way. Thought you knew.
  • Apr 16, 2019, 02:13 PM
    Wondergirl
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    You thumpers didn't date much before you were married did you?

    That's what I have gathered from this thread.
    Quote:

    We agree though that it's the women who get pregnant and NOT the men, and it's the woman who decides what to do about her pregnancy, not the man. It's always been that way. Thought you knew.
    That sums it up!
  • Apr 16, 2019, 02:20 PM
    jlisenbe
    Quote:

    You thumpers didn't date much before you were married did you? There was and always will be more than one kind of woman, just as there is and always will be more than one kind of man. We agree though that it's the women who get pregnant and NOT the men and it's the women who decides what to do about her pregnancy, not the men. It's always been that way. Thought you knew.
    Yeah. Just like there has always been racists, murderers, bank robbers, and various others who engaged in bad behavior. The point is that we should join together in saying it is wrong. And again, you are fine with killing babies in the womb. I don't even begin to understand that, but it's on you and not on me, thank the Lord.
  • Apr 16, 2019, 02:43 PM
    Wondergirl
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jlisenbe View Post
    And again, you are fine with killing babies in the womb. I don't even begin to understand that, but it's on you and not on me, thank the Lord.

    And you are fine with killing babies once they've been born. I don't begin to understand that, but it's on you and not on me, thank the Lord.
  • Apr 16, 2019, 03:00 PM
    paraclete
    This debate has gone from the sublime to the ridiculous
  • Apr 16, 2019, 03:55 PM
    talaniman
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jlisenbe View Post
    Yeah. Just like there has always been racists, murderers, bank robbers, and various others who engaged in bad behavior. The point is that we should join together in saying it is wrong. And again, you are fine with killing babies in the womb. I don't even begin to understand that, but it's on you and not on me, thank the Lord.

    Good luck stopping people from making there own mistakes and better luck changing a bad human into a good one. The day after pill is killing a child in the womb? You need more than luck stopping humans good or bad from doing what we've been doing since we started doing it. Now find something we agree on, and can work toward together, because I just ain't about telling another human what to do.

    Spare me the selective morality please as you cannot even denounce the bad behavior, words, and antics of a lying cheating dufus who scarfed trillions for him and his crew and gave you a few crumbs and now wants to cut your hard earned benefits that you can't pass to your kids. You hate debts but allow debts, so please don't talk about being the champion of babies. I suppose you need to lord it over someone to feel like you stand for something though, and that's more sad than infuriating.

    You can't even give that female with four kids credit for not having an abortion, you still find a sin to condemn her for. So build your freaking wall to hide behind from needy scared families running from the same thing your peeps ran from and ignore the loonies shooting up schools, churches, movie houses, and malls, while you tell me about killing babies in the womb knowing you ain't taking care of any of them.

    You got life and BS all mixed up my friend and for the life of me I do not understand it.
  • Apr 16, 2019, 05:24 PM
    jlisenbe
    Quote:

    You got life and BS all mixed up my friend and for the life of me I do not understand it.
    Unborn children in the womb. That's the lives I'm talking about. All the other stuff you talk about is just an attempt at distraction. When we talk about destroying lives in abortion, you go on a rant about walls and shootings and debt and other assorted problems, and then suggest (wrongly) I am OK with all of that. You are avoiding the issue of your support of allowing the killing of children in the womb.
  • Apr 17, 2019, 03:38 AM
    talaniman
    I can respect your position, but obviously you dodge the direct question of the morning after pill and the topic is the border wall so I am not sure who is distracted here.
    The day after pill is killing a child in the womb?

    I have been clear that abortion is not my choice, but it is the choice of many and always has been. The real issue you dodge often is what to do after the deed is done?

  • Apr 17, 2019, 04:37 AM
    jlisenbe
    Quote:

    The day after pill is killing a child in the womb?
    It certainly ends the life of a human being. There is no other way to see it.

    Quote:

    I have been clear that abortion is not my choice, but it is the choice of many and always has been.
    That just won't work. It's on the same level as saying, "Murder is not my choice, but it is the choice of many." That does nothing to change the issue of the rightness or wrongness of the choice.

    Quote:

    The real issue you dodge often is what to do after the deed is done?


    I don't think I've dodged the question at all. People get to make their own decisions. We are told on this board that we cannot force our religious ideas on others. OK, but if someone wants to make her own decisions absent any input from others, then she must be prepared to take the responsibility for her own actions. Now if I choose to (and I do), then I can help her and her child, but I will not put on my "holier than thou" robe by forcing another person to help that woman. I do not agree with your idea that you can force others to do what you don't seem willing to do yourself, which is to give resources to help another person.

    Might add that it is a good thing we have Christians in this world who operate crisis pregnancy centers that help young mothers rather than doing abortions like PP.

    The bottom line is this. I will not lend my support, as you do, to politicians whose idea of a solution is to kill the bothersome little human being before he/she can be born, thus sparing us all the inconvenience of having to take care of the child. That way we can go back to having sex with whoever for as long as we like. I find that idea to be nauseating and a perfect description of the age in which we live where so-called "sexual freedom" is king and human lives mean very little.
  • Apr 17, 2019, 07:24 AM
    talaniman
    So it's illegal for government to establish a safety net for those in need? You were outvoted on that LAWFULLY ,but whine if you must whether it's right or wrong. The same goes with abortion rights, and preventing unwanted pregnancy. or even gay rights. I can't stop you from expressing yourself and you can't stop me from disagreeing, nor should we right? So far you've been outvoted. Been there too.
  • Apr 17, 2019, 10:29 AM
    jlisenbe
    Wasn't outvoted on abortion or gay marriage either one. Our liberal Supreme Court awarded us with those two.
  • Apr 17, 2019, 03:57 PM
    talaniman
    Maybe you should look up the history of both before it was affirmed by SCOTUS.

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:27 AM.