Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Current Events (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=486)
-   -   Right wing moving FURTHER right 2.0 (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=742592)

  • Aug 20, 2013, 07:08 AM
    excon
    Hello again, Steve:

    We BOTH want him to get the nomination, don't we?

    excon
  • Aug 20, 2013, 07:27 AM
    speechlesstx
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello again, Steve:

    We BOTH want him to get the nomination, don't we?

    excon

    I'm not picking anyone yet, but I'm loving the show so far. There's nothing to worry about right, what's to fear about a one term senator who's done nothing possibly being the leader of the country?
  • Aug 20, 2013, 07:34 AM
    tomder55
    The bar has been set . Scott Brown is hangin in Iowa too.
  • Aug 20, 2013, 07:41 AM
    excon
    Hello again,

    So, if Obama fails because he's a rookie, you're going to bring in your own rookie... THAT'S a good plan..

    excon
  • Aug 20, 2013, 07:44 AM
    talaniman
    Yeah bring in your rookie!!
  • Aug 20, 2013, 07:48 AM
    smoothy
    Michael Jordon was a rookie once...

    And some rookies like Obama choke when the spotlight hits them and they have to perform rather than talk.
  • Aug 20, 2013, 07:50 AM
    tomder55
    Rookie ? The emperor didn't stay in the league long enough to qualify as a rookie.
  • Aug 20, 2013, 07:56 AM
    smoothy
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    rookie ? the emperor didn't stay in the league long enough to qualify as a rookie.

    True... all he did was talk about playing ball... he never actually played a game that mattered. And it shows.
  • Aug 20, 2013, 02:41 PM
    tomder55
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by paraclete View Post
    Tom it is obvious we had a vast sea in the inland too, I have travelled across gibber plain, ancient sea bed. But what this tells us is that things change over time so I agree change is normal. It is not Krakotoa and similar we get those every century somewhere but the supervolcanoes in Yellowstone and Rotarua that change the climate for centuries, millennia and we are overdue for such an eruption. I am concerned that they might exist where we know nothing about them. We are five volcanoes away from nuclear winter at any time

    or it could be heat from below .

    Quote:

    The Greenland ice sheet is melting from below, caused by a high heat flow from the mantle into the lithosphere. This influence is very variable spatially and has its origin in an exceptionally thin lithosphere. Consequently, there is an increased heat flow from the mantle and a complex interplay between this geothermal heating and the Greenland ice sheet. The international research initiative IceGeoHeat led by the GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences establishes in the current online issue of Nature Geoscience (Vol 6, August 11, 2013) that this effect cannot be neglected when modeling the ice sheet as part of a climate study.
    Heat flow from Earth's mantle contributes to Greenland ice melting
  • Aug 20, 2013, 06:08 PM
    paraclete
    Tom I have long said that CO2 is not the sole contributor in fact human activity only accounts for about 20%, irrespective of what the wankers at the UN think, this is why temperature rises have flattened and their models don't work, but I don't subscribe entirely to the heat from below theory, where was all this heat during the ice ages. We need to get back to planting trees not cutting them down and stop thinking about them as a sustainable resource
  • Aug 20, 2013, 06:30 PM
    talaniman
    Polluting the air, land, and water has no effect on the environment, or the people animals and insects in it? That's the dumbest thing I ever heard.
  • Aug 20, 2013, 07:46 PM
    paraclete
    CO2 as a pollutant is the dumbest thing I have ever heard
  • Aug 20, 2013, 08:01 PM
    talaniman
    Is Carbon Dioxide a Pollutant? | Weather Underground

    Throwing off the natural balance of CO2 kills life on Earth.
  • Aug 20, 2013, 08:57 PM
    paraclete
    Who is the arbiteur of what is the natural balance? Just because we have a level at this moment doesn't make it the natural balance, just a balance at this point in time because this is what we observe
  • Aug 20, 2013, 09:05 PM
    talaniman
    Deleted
  • Aug 20, 2013, 11:26 PM
    paraclete
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    Deleted

    I suspect your response was unprintable
  • Aug 21, 2013, 03:27 AM
    tomder55
    Quote:

    where was all this heat during the ice ages. We need to get back to planting trees not cutting them down and stop thinking about them as a sustainable resource
    Well I already explained my pet hypothesis that the natural state of the planet is warm with a higher concentration of carbon in the atmosphere. Before the ice ages there were tropical forests at the North Poll. Fossil records prove that. This was during the Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum . This was probably assisted by a heat from below event... either that or the dinosaurs were driving SUVs and blowing garbage into the air via smoke stacks .
  • Aug 21, 2013, 04:36 AM
    Tuttyd
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    Well I already explained my pet hypothesis that the natural state of the planet is warm with a higher concentration of carbon in the atmosphere. Before the ice ages there were tropical forests at the North Poll. Fossil records prove that. This was during the Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum . This was probably assisted by a heat from below event ......either that or the dinosaurs were driving SUVs and blowing garbage into the air via smoke stacks .


    Yes, but just because the natural state of the environment back then was high levels of CO2 doesn't provide justification for artificially creating high levels of CO2 now.
  • Aug 21, 2013, 05:05 AM
    speechlesstx
    So what's the justification for all the doom and gloom hysteria of the impending man-made climate apocalypse even though the "settled science" keeps coming up short?
  • Aug 21, 2013, 05:11 AM
    Tuttyd
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    So what's the justification for all the doom and gloom hysteria of the impending man-made climate apocalypse even though the "settled science" keeps coming up short?


    No gloom and doom on my part. My only concern was that the southern oceans are becoming a carbon sink for CO2. However, that wasn't the point I was making to Tom. I was suggesting that his theory is an example of affirming the consequence.

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:10 AM.