Still bouncing all over the place... proof neither of you know as much as you think... and have been quessing way wrong.. which is no surprise since you guess way wrong on a lot of things.
![]() |
So far I have only seen the bad guys reload, and kill more people, and have yet to see any example of a good guy doing the same to save himself, or anyone else. If you know of such an example of the good guys reloading to save the day, please share it.
I am not against gun, or the rights of citizens to have them for any reason. Quite the opposite and have said so.
And the only time you will likely ever hear about reloading in the media is to fuel the hysterics over guns. It really doesn't matter if we have any examples or not, I don't like the idea of morons who have no clue how guns work and are OK with me being dead anyway limiting my ability to protect myself and my family to 7 bullets, or none if they have their way.
Why should any American ever be restricted to how many they can have in the first place, or what type?
What part of "Shall not be abridged" do they not understand... perhaps its time we start abridging the freedom of the press and free speech to the same standards...
By that argument... the Police should not own ANY automatic weapons... they don't NEED them.
Hello smoothy:
What part of "well REGULATED" do YOU not get?
excon
In 50+ years, my husband has never needed a gun to defend his family, but twice he has almost shot a neighbor and once almost shot me. I wonder how many times legal guns end up wounding and killing family members, neighbors, friends, relatives, but never are used on an intruder. I wonder what the ratio is.
Maybe your husband shouldn't have a gun, sounds like he's shooting at the wrong people. Don't stop me from from having the capacity to defend my family because your hubby is incompetent with a gun. I cut off part of a finger with a jointer and I'm not trying to keep others from using one.
I'm curious how you almost shoot a neighbor... or a spouse? Unless you were playing with it like a toy or carelessly brandishing it around.
I'm 51... I've never almost shot a neighbor or my wife... even once, not by accident... and not on purpose either..
I did almost shoot someone during hunting season once... but that's only because the dimwit ran in front of me just as I was ready to kill a deer (that was only 20 yards away. Yes... one eye closed... eye on the scope... and starting to squeese the trigger when suddenly my view of the deer went black instantly.
The only people I've ever aimed at are waiting for me at the brass gates, if you believe that sort of thing. Obviously WG's hubby needed some safety instruction, or some more. To find "accidental" shootings, one should probably research negligent homicide statistics.
And every one of those were preventible if someone hadn't done something stupid... like trying to clean a gun before they VERIFY its actually unloaded.
Any gun you pick up you ASSUME is loaded... until you prove it otherwise.
Most of the time... accidental.. equates with someone not following the most basic rules of gun safety.
You mean like not pointing a loaded gun with your finger on the trigger toward the yard your children are playing in?
THose kids need a very healthy spanking the FIRST time they get caught touching them...
If nothing was done then it's the parents fault for not instilling the fear of god in them for playing with stuff not theirs.
I gew up around guns... we never had a single event where we played with them... not the real ones.
My kids had had the full NRA safety course before they could read. At 6 they could deep-clean both rifles and shotguns. We added pistols by age 12. The reason these tools are called 'dangerous' is the people doing the calling are ignorant. A crane in my hands is VERY dangerous, because I have no clue how to operate it. Hand tools, not so much
Doesn't matter, if he has to do it 3 times 7 bullets won't get the job done.
So how many people have you killed?Quote:
Originally Posted by Catsmine
My dogs my first line of defense, God bless her.
Is that some kind of code because I don't know what that means.Quote:
I think Gunney Flores got #s 4, 5, and 6
Remember that Aurora shooter that Colorado's new gun control measures are going to prevent? Yeah? Well if police would have listened to his psychiatrist it could have been prevented.
She warned them a month before the shooting of “his danger to the public due to homicidal statements he had made.” She also told police he had “threatened and harassed her via email/text messages” 8 days before the shooting, yet records that were previously sealed show police made no contact with the shooter.
Of course none of this fits the narrative that guns were the problem, not an unstable wacko that police were warned about. They dropped the ball, they didn't even follow up after receiving warning from a medical professional that he was homicidal.
Holmes' doctor warned police before Colo. theater attack
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:01 PM. |