You copied me again!! Unreal. At least I know I am having a good influence on you.Quote:
Lame.
|
You copied me again!! Unreal. At least I know I am having a good influence on you.Quote:
Lame.
I doubt you've ever had a good influence on anyone!Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Doubting seems to be your strong point.
Better than having NO strong points!Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Enough. We don't care for each other's views. That's fine by me.
It's always been fine with me. I enjoy pointing out your errors.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
If you ever do, then let me know.
No problem. Just go back and read the last several months.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
As usual, no specifics.
They're all there for the reading.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Sure they are.
Yup, they sure are.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Quote:
The study in Lancet is flawed and it is a study and not a clinical trial .
https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=847488&p=3853190#post3853190
Lancet's retraction :
https://marlin-prod.literatumonline....3620313246.pdfQuote:
After publication of our Lancet Article,1 several concernswere raised with respect to the veracity of the dataand analyses conducted by Surgisphere Corporationand its founder and our co-author, Sapan Desai, inour publication. We launched an independent thirdparty peer review of Surgisphere with the consent ofSapan Desai to evaluate the origination of the databaseelements, to confirm the completeness of the database,and to replicate the analyses presented in the paper.Our independent peer reviewers informed us thatSurgisphere would not transfer the full dataset, clientcontracts, and the full ISO audit report to their serversfor analysis as such transfer would violate clientagreements and confidentiality requirements. As such,our reviewers were not able to conduct an independentand private peer review and therefore notified us of theirwithdrawal from the peer-review process.We always aspire to perform our research in accordancewith the highest ethical and professional guidelines. Wecan never forget the responsibility we have as researchersto scrupulously ensure that we rely on data sources thatadhere to our high standards. Based on this development,we can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primarydata sources. Due to this unfortunate development, theauthors request that the paper be retracted.We all entered this collaboration to contributein good faith and at a time of great need duringthe COVID-19 pandemic. We deeply apologise toyou, the editors, and the journal readership for anyembarrassment or inconvenience that this may havecaused.
It is now official. The world has gone crazy.
Fired FBI director James Comey to teach ethics at Virginia college
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/a...olence/559835/
Well the dufus said he was smarter than the generals so they are now speaking out against him, and the medicos will follow after he stopped listening to them too. No the world isn't crazy but the dufus certainly is acting like a nut!
Comey to teach ethics? Come on. Even a died in the wool liberal dem can see the irony in that. It would be like Trump teaching a class on social skills.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics...ter-06-04-2020
Answer why I should obey a guy in camouflage and a gun but no identification or insignia?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...heim-ntp-feeds
I guess the dufus got his wall.
Your article opens with the tear gas lie, so it was hard to follow the rest of it. But for the WH to extend its security perimeter in this particular time seems reasonable to me.
Can't think of a better place to put it, it will keep those southerners from Florida inQuote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
Might have to cut off the lights and water too.
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:45 AM. |