"Anybody but Obama" would fit for you. It covers anything you have ever posted, represents your views, and explains why you would vote for one who has said he will take your money from your pocket, and put it in his.
You're welcome.
|
"Anybody but Obama" would fit for you. It covers anything you have ever posted, represents your views, and explains why you would vote for one who has said he will take your money from your pocket, and put it in his.
You're welcome.
Who do you have in mind who is more radical than Obama ? Given the choice between Obama and someone more radical than Obama I would certainly vote for the more moderate . But the Dems keep on pushing ever "left" . So Obama is more radical than Kerry ,and Clintoon ,Dukakis ,Mondale ,and Carter before him .
What radical? He hasn't done anything radical except get bin Laden killed.
If you think Obama is radical you need glasses, or you are too conservative. If anything he isn't radical enough. I would have had Rep.Wilson banned for life for interupting my SOU speech, and drug tested and balls stretched behind his ears.
That would be radical.
Or had him waterboarded...
Or declare Marshall law and have congress sequestered until he had the jobs act,and the dream act ready to sign, or better yet, docked their pay, starting from 2010! Now that's radical I can believe in!
Hello again,
Ok, the veep distraction is over... Romney was HOPING it would quash the tax return question... It didn't..
What's he HIDING?
excon
If we're talking hiding let's at least deal with reality instead of rumors.Quote:
Originally Posted by excon
What is Obama hiding from Issa in the F&F investigation?
Why did his democrat predecessor block his own subpoena in the Countrywide mess?
Why won't Democrats refer to the home of their convention by its name, Bank of America Stadium?
Why is Biden being sent home early for the weekend?
What are the hiding?
Don't change the subject to avoid answering the question. What are YOU hiding?Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Ya think those tax returns would educate us as to how an unemployed guy has income without selling drugs(?), or if he needs a tax cut, or NOT! (IF I'm paying for it, shouldn't I be able to see for myself how much it is?).
I want to know how he got so much in a retirement account (without a job?? )? How you get taxed three times on the same money and still only pay 13% in taxes? Knowing that could help us economically challenged types, don't agree??
Enquiring minds want to know. Trust but..!
CC Sabatthia.Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
Presidential candidates have a to privacy, there is no requirement to release tax records and yet he did. Deal with the facts in evidence, not some puerile rumor.Quote:
Ya think those tax returns would educate us as to how an unemployed guy has income without selling drugs(?), or if he needs a tax cut, or NOT! (IF I'm paying for it, shouldn't I be able to see for myself how much it is?).
It's a legit question to ask why investment incomes are taxed at a lower rate than payroll taxes? It's a legit question to ask is he running for president to extract wealth for himself, or is he legally hiding something we need to know.
Its legit to examine the guy who wants to be president. Those aren't rumors, they are QUESTIONS! He has answered none, not even how he pays for his tax cuts.
Yes it legit to vet the candidates. Shame the media didn't bother to do that with Obama.
You have more than enough info on Romney from his time at Bain, the SLC Olympics, MA governor, first presidential run... what more do you need, a trip through his colon?
No we'll settle for going through his garbage
Very simple... if you are not satisfied with what he has disclosed ,then vote against him.
A reasonable proposition.Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
http://rbo2.files.wordpress.com/2012...pg?w=584&h=405
Couldn't resist .
If that's the way you see it then you do indeed have the party blinders on.Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
Hello again, tom:Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
It's a funny cartoon... But, I noticed something that should be on the other side... Our credit downgrade was a direct result of REPUBLICAN action...
In fact, as I digest the list, there are a few OTHER items that should be on the other side...
excon
How is that ex, because Republicans refused to roll over for Obama? You seriously believe Democrats bear no responsibility? Get real.
Hello again, Steve:Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Roll over for Obama? Maybe you just don't understand what the debt ceiling IS? Or, your memory is faulty.. Raising the debt ceiling wasn't FOR Obama. HE doesn't care. It's about whether, as a country, we would pay our bills...
But, the REPUBLICANS used the threat of DEFAULT to get some concession from the Democrats. The FINANCIAL community saw this as a WILLINGNESS by Republicans to throw the economy off the cliff, and they downgraded our credit rating because of it...
Now, I'm SURE you BELIEVE, with ALL of your right wing heart, that Joe Biden saying something about chains, CAUSED our downgrade... But, as usual, you'd be WRONG.
Bwa, ha ha ha ha.
excon
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:50 PM. |