Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Current Events (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=486)
-   -   Evils of Credit Cards (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=265402)

  • Oct 1, 2008, 08:02 AM
    Iknowalotofstuff
    Evils of Credit Cards
    New topic: Credit Cards

    Credit Cards are the bane of human existence.

    Credit Cards allow the user to have what he wants rather than what he needs. Credit Cards are a mortgage on ones future. Credit Cards make credit card companies huge profits.

    I have a client who is on ODSP. ODSP stands for the Ontario Disability Support Program. It provides income of about $1050.00$ to developmentally, physically and mentally challenged individuals. The funds are not taxed and are exempt from seizure under any circumstances.

    This client has a $2000,00 Sears Credit Card at 28.8% (2.25%/month) with a minimum payment of 5% of the balance. He has no problem with this card and treated it like gold.
    While he was not the brightest bulb in the package, he understood what he had to pay on the card based on his statement. Realistically, he had no idea about interest or borrowing.

    Sears Canada sold their credit portfolio to Chase Mastercard. Chase sent my client a replacement card... a mastercard... with a $2000.00 limit at 18.5% with a 3% minimum payment. If he card were used to the limit, the payment is $60.00 with $32.00 of interest. It would take my client assuming he never used the card again about 150 months of minimum payments to pay off the debt. If he paid the maximum payment of $60.00 and never used the card again, he would pay about $4200.00 over 48 months. By the way, any reasonable assessment of his actual expenses and the source / nature of his income would have determined he did not qualify for the credit card.

    I sure you know what comes next. He used the card. Chase kept raising his credit limit eventually to $7000.00 and never actually spoke to the customer. Once other credit card companies saw her had a mastercard, they sent him preapproved cards hoping he would give them his Chase business. He got $5000.00 in other credit.

    Now the Dr. Phil question: What were they thinking? Lets give $12000.00 to a person on disability welfare even thought he hasn't asked us for it.

    One note; The majority of the $12000.00 in credit is interest and payments. My client used the cards to pay the cards.

    Result: Client declares bankruptcy and credit card debt is discharged. At the date of bankrupty the credit card debts were up to date.

    Post Bankruptcy Event:
    Chase sues client in SCC for $1400.00 being the amount placed on the credit card in the 60 days prior to bankruptcy alleging that the he knew or should have know of his desperate financial situation at least 60 days prior to his assignment. Chase alleges that use of a credit card is a representation at the time of use of the ability to repay. The suggest that the client knew he could not pay, deceived them by not disclosing his true circumstances and represented that he could, they relied on the representation and suffered damages. They wanted the court to rule that this portion of the Chase balance was not discharged.

    The matter went to trial and Chase lost. The judge concluded that since Chase never spoke to him either when he received the initial card or thereafter when the credit limit was increased he never made a representation to them. Each time he used the card he did not reaffirm any initial representation. The issue of a fraud does not deal with a person's ability to do something but their intent to do something. Ability does not equal intent.

    A case in support of this view was introduced. A unemployed person owed $50000.00 in credit card debt. He has about $5000.00 left under his credit limits on these cards. He took the $5000.00 the local casino with the intent of parlaying the $5000.00 into $50000.00 to pay his credt credit card debt. He lost his $5000.00He declare bankruptcy. Credit Card sued him alledging he did not have the ability to repay the $5000.00 when he gambled with it. The court concluded that the bankrupt has no ability to pay. The court also concluded that the bankrupt's intent, however misguided, was to repay his creditors. The court concluded that the debt was discharged in the bankruptcy.

    A credit card is a defective product much lile tobacco. It is legal to use. It can become addictive. It attacks in small amounts growing to a large dependence. In many case, the user cannot stop using it.

    Let's talk about this
  • Oct 1, 2008, 08:10 AM
    tomder55

    OK I regularly use my credit card for almost all my purchases. I pay the complete balance on a monthly basis and never pay interest .I accumulate points up the kazoo by doing so and have paid for my last 2 vacation's air fair utilizing this method.
  • Oct 1, 2008, 08:23 AM
    ScottGem

    Sorry, but its not only the card its also the user. Sure, cards are enticing and they can be addicting. But there are loads of people who manage their finances and credit responsibily.
  • Oct 1, 2008, 10:16 AM
    excon
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Iknowalotofstuff View Post
    A credit card is a defective product much lile tobacco. It is legal to use. It can become addictive. It attacks in small amounts growing to a large dependance. In many case, the user cannot stop using it. Let's talk about this

    Hello know:

    Let's start our relationship by my telling you that I don't know squat.

    That being said, I think a credit card is much more like alcohol than tobacco. Tobacco addicts virtually ALL its users, while only a small percentage of alcohol users become addicted.

    When it became clear, through education, that tobacco kills people, HALF of the people who used tobacco stopped using it. IF people were educated in the proper use of credit, it would bite fewer people. But, there'll always be those who misuse a product.

    Now, don't take that to mean that I excuse their sleazy sales pitches, and their usurious interest rates. I don't. But a citizen can certainly say no.

    As misused as it is by some, that doesn't mean the product is bad. Far from it. In fact, if credit cards are used wisely, one can leverage them to one's own advantage rather inexpensively.

    excon
  • Oct 1, 2008, 10:55 AM
    ScottGem

    Just to show the flip side, that credit card issuers are not all bad, I'll relate a recent incident. I have a BOA card where the balance is under a promotional rate for 3 years (about 26 months left). It was used to pay for a transmission repair.

    I messed up earlier this month. I had thought I had scheduled payments before I went on vacation, but apparently I didn't complete the setup. So I didn't notice the payment hadn't been made. As soon as I did I immediately sent a payment but it was late.

    When I got the statement and noticed they had jacked up the interest rate (which I expected) I called and they immediately gave me back the promotional rate. They didn't have to but they did.

    So some do give consideration to customers.
  • Oct 16, 2008, 06:57 PM
    CreditTard

    If people only spent what they could afford they wouldn't be in this problem. Credit cards aren't the deep down problem it's the way people spend. Although credit cards don't help the situation with there high interest rates.
  • Oct 16, 2008, 08:20 PM
    Iknowalotofstuff

    A credit card is like a package of cigarettes and it should have the same type of warning. The use of this product could be dangerous to your financial health.

    Credit card industry wants you to use your credit card like a cigarette. Just use it. The negative consequences will happen to someone else.

    If the minimum payment on a credit card were 10% of the balance and the interest rate were 12%, the credit card industry would go bankrupt, A $5000.00 balace would have payments of $500.00 per month and the interst would be $50.00. Debt gone in no time.

    We see the fallout of easy credit right now on Wall Street. A 3% payment on a credit card at 18% is a recipe for disaster. And the industy doesn't give a sh*t.
  • Oct 17, 2008, 10:47 AM
    Merris
    Hey Know it all... :) (kidding)

    I'll weigh in here because I have received about 5 credit card offers... for my two-year-old daughter. While I agree with the others that there should be responsibility on the part of the borrower... sending credit card offers to a two-year-old? There is something definitely wrong in America. But it's not just credit cards... it's the whole culture of credit that we've created.

    Here is something interesting I heard while listening to the news the other day... People in China don't use credit cards. They pay for everything with cash, while Americans are largely sustaining their lifestyles and a nation on imaginary money or credit cards. Imaginary money that they use to buy products by and large produced... in China.

    What's more deeply disturbing is that China is also loaning us money to pay for the war in Iraq and now they are loaning us money for this bailout. Some of the money for our tax rebates even came from China. Many people cashed the check, and instead of paying off their credit card, went to Wal-Mart and guess what... the money went right back to China. The deficit doesn't even fit on the board anymore and most of the money... we owe to them.

    It leaves me wondering what this means exactly for our country. And is it wise to elect a leader such as McCain who is going to indefinitely continue a losing war on borrowed money from a fascist country with horrible human rights violations and 5 billion people? Wake up republicans.
  • Oct 17, 2008, 11:07 AM
    tomder55

    Now think about it . If there was no strength in the American economy why would they invest so heavily in it ?

    What pisses me off is that our pockets were picked to add liquidity to the economy and instead the financial institutions say they will hoard the money for at least the next quarter .

    Credit is a good thing if used properly . I don't pay interest and get cash back so not only do I get the service virtually for free ;but they pay me to use the service How great is that! It makes tracking my expenses real easy and some of my purchases are insured by them. My last two vacations had cross country flights paid for by the card issuer.

    Perhaps it should come with a warning ;but to equate it to cigarettes is exaggerated .
  • Oct 17, 2008, 11:19 AM
    Merris
    Tom-- I commend you for using your credit cards wisely but you are in a minority when you look at the real figures of people's debt to income ratio. I have also purchased international tickets with my points. Unfortunately I bought a crappy American car and I have a cat with diabetes which keeps my balance hard to pay off... :)
  • Oct 17, 2008, 11:23 AM
    Merris
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    now think about it . if there was no strength in the American economy why would they invest so heavily in it ?

    I think the point is more about draining the strength. When America loses its financial power we lose our position in the world and also our ability to make decisions that benefit our country.
  • Oct 17, 2008, 11:48 AM
    ScottGem
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Merris View Post
    Tom-- I commend you for using your credit cards wisely but you are in a minority when you look at the real figures of people's debt to income ratio.

    I think you miss the point here. Granted Tom is in a minority because he takes advantage of the credit card system instead of letting it take advantage of him. But that just reiterates that the problem is not the system but the way people use it.
  • Oct 17, 2008, 12:09 PM
    Merris
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by ScottGem View Post
    I think you miss the point here. Granted Tom is in a minority because he takes advantage of the credit card system instead of letting it take advantage of him. But that just reiterates that the problem is not the system but the way people use it.

    No I don't miss the point at all. I know that most republicans espouse the idea of letting the corporation do whatever it wants to make the fattest profit possible. They think that the strength of the individual and letting people decide for themselves is the best course of action. I agree with you to a certain extent. Prohibition is an example of this. Alcohol is legal, but most people aren't alcoholics. I personally enjoy drinking a beer but I'm moderate about it. I don't feel that just because a minority has a severe problem that I should do without. But if alcohol were as addictive and detrimental as heroin where a mother leaves her baby in a crib for months in the same diaper... weeeelllll I feel a little differently.

    If most people were like Tom I would say suck it up and deal with it. The reality, though, is that credit is a black hole many college students fall into that they can't get out of. A lot of it has to do with predatory lending and people receiving 3 - 5 offers for cards daily. That's about how many I get. Blindly sticking up for corporate practices while ignoring reality seems pretty foolhardy especially when our country's interest is at stake.
  • Oct 17, 2008, 12:12 PM
    ScottGem
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Merris View Post

    If most people were like Tom I would say suck it up and deal with it. The reality, though, is that credit is a black hole many college students fall into that they can't get out of. A lot of it has to do with predatory lending and people receiving 3 - 5 offers for cards daily. That's about how many I get. Blindly sticking up for corporate practices while ignoring reality seems pretty foolhardy especially when our country's interest is at stake.

    So the answer is education and some controls. Not damining the system.
  • Oct 17, 2008, 12:18 PM
    Iknowalotofstuff

    So you would suggest that we educate the greedy Wall Street traders and put in some more controls to prevent the financial catastrohe that we are in. This is about greed. The system is damned.
  • Oct 17, 2008, 12:19 PM
    inthebox
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Merris View Post
    Blindly sticking up for corporate practices while ignoring reality seems pretty foolhardy especially when our country's interest is at stake.

    Why don't we take it further :)

    Lets eliminate all forms of advertising. :eek:

    For cars, clothes, furniture, appliances, techno gadgets, restaurants, etc...

    After all are they not enticing us folks to spend money that we don't have?



    Better yet, and this is no knock against them, lets us live like the Amish and make all our clothes and food and ride buggys ? :p


    PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY is the key.
  • Oct 17, 2008, 12:19 PM
    Merris
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by ScottGem View Post
    So the answer is education and some controls. Not damining the system.

    Exactly. I think it should be illegal for credit companies to offer credit that exceeds a percentage of a person's income. Because what happens is the person files bankruptcy and the people who use their cards responsibly end up absorbing the costs in fees. THEN the person who filed bankruptcy just goes to the next tier of credit lending which is high interest legal loan sharking.

    I think credit is a great tool... but by maintaining some control on these banks we also protect the people like Tom who end up paying the price for predatory lending.
  • Oct 17, 2008, 12:26 PM
    ScottGem

    I was slightly shocked recently when I got a letter from one of my cards (a store card administered by a major bank) that they were reducing my credit line. The reason given was solely because I wasn't using anywhere near the line I had been given so it was to my advantage to have a lower line.
  • Oct 17, 2008, 12:28 PM
    Iknowalotofstuff

    If we were to hold those greedy wall street traders personally responsible for the financial cricis, there would or should be no bailout. But we are bailing them out. What lesson do they learn?
  • Oct 17, 2008, 12:45 PM
    Merris
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by inthebox View Post
    Why don't we take it further :)

    Lets eliminate all forms of advertising. :eek:

    For cars, clothes, furniture, appliances, techno gadgets, restaurants, etc...

    After all are they not enticing us folks to spend money that we don't have?


    PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY is the key.

    I agree with you. I think people should be personally responsible. Should they be the only ones responsible and corporations can do whatever they want? No. And yes, let's talk about advertising. Because in trickle down economics, that's where the money is trickling to. The CEOs pocket big checks and the people working at the bottom continue making minimum wage while BILLIONS go into advertising during the superbowl. People want more things, they use their credit card, they get in debt, both parents have to work, the kid sits in daycare 9 hours a day five days a week. People complain about lack of morality as being the death of the family... well I say turn off the TV. It's pretty astounding to me that many here think that setting reasonable rules for a credit card company is socialism. You going to defend car insurance companies next? Well I've been effed in the A by both and I know you have too. Where do you people come from??
  • Oct 17, 2008, 12:47 PM
    Merris
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by ScottGem View Post
    I was slightly shocked recently when I got a letter from one of my cards (a store card administered by a major bank) that they were reducing my credit line. The reason given was solely because I wasn't using anywhere near the line I had been given so it was to my advantage to have a lower line.

    Was this after the bailout?
  • Oct 17, 2008, 01:45 PM
    simoneaugie

    We can starve the loan-sharks. Pay off your credit (not mortgages) and don't get any more unless you can pay it off within one month. Throw those pre-approved offers away before even thinking about signing your income away.

    I have done this. It took several years. Now they tell me that my credit is less than perfect because I don't use a credit card! Eeff them! Yeah, the bonus points are a loss for me. The peace of mind and simplicity of life makes up for it.
  • Oct 17, 2008, 02:02 PM
    Merris
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by simoneaugie View Post
    We can starve the loan-sharks. Pay off your credit (not mortgages) and don't get any more unless you can pay it off within one month. Throw those pre-approved offers away before even thinking about signing your income away.

    I have done this. It took several years. Now they tell me that my credit is less than perfect because I don't use a credit card! Eeff them! Yeah, the bonus points are a loss for me. The peace of mind and simplicity of life makes up for it.


    Hear hear!
  • Oct 17, 2008, 02:04 PM
    Iknowalotofstuff

    The trickle down theory is bad economics. It states that if you make the rich richer they will voluntarily redistribute their wealth without government intervention. This is BS and a recipe for the increasing gap between the rich and the not so rich. People who want to legislate a redistribution of weath so that the not so rich have something are called socialists.

    The goldern rule used to be "do unto others as they do unto you". The new economic golden rule is "do it to them before they do it to you".
    We are a nation of buyers and sellers of things. If we do not sell, the economy does not prosper. The cost of everything is going up while real wages are static. How then can we buy. We mortgage our future earnings to have these things we want but do not necessarily need.

    The sooner we start to think in terms of "we" rather than "me" the better off we will be. A prime example is health care in the US. A heart attack should not put someone into bankruptcy. Heathcare is a right not a privilege.

    If the government can fund roads and parks, the arts and the space program, buy $23.00 army helmets for 50 bucks, they can certainly from the entire tax base fund heathcare.

    The people who are against a national health care system are those who make money on the sick. What other reason can there be?

    Credit card companies are the HMO of the financal field.
  • Oct 17, 2008, 02:05 PM
    Iknowalotofstuff

    They there are pay day loans. Borrow $400.00 payback $500.00 in two weeks. Effective rate is more than 640%. They say the rate is 25% of the amount. Pick on the most desperate. Then there is HR Block and their ilk discounting tax returns. Then there are the Sopranos. Credit Cards.. all sharks.
  • Oct 17, 2008, 02:09 PM
    excon
    Hello know:

    There's one good thing about the present breakdown. Those places are toast, and won't return.

    excon
  • Oct 17, 2008, 03:09 PM
    tomder55

    For what it is worth I agree that the bailout was a bad idea. The financial institutions have made it clear that they have no intention of using our generousity to loosen their lending . They are planning on hoarding the money for at least the next quarter.

    I know that a trillion dollars given back to the people would've been instantly stimulative if there was a need for any government intervention at all.

    I agree with you that college students should not be subject to the pressures of the alliance between the lending institutions and the educational institutions to sign up for cards from these predators . Sure we know that college students are generally stupid people.
  • Oct 17, 2008, 03:22 PM
    excon
    Hello again,

    We used to have usury laws that protected the public from predatory lending and loan sharking. Somebody thought we should rescind them. I'll bet it was the bankers and their buddies the Republicans who've been in charge of ALL THREE branches of government for 8 of the last 10 years. I kind of think that's when these predator pay day lenders started cropping up.

    We used to have bankruptcy laws that were fair, but they were changed to favor the banks. I wonder who changed those laws.

    We used to have laws that protected the credit card holder from his bank raising his interest rate to unheard of levels whenever the BANK wanted to. I wonder who changed those laws.

    excon
  • Oct 17, 2008, 04:16 PM
    inthebox
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Iknowalotofstuff View Post
    The trickle down theory is bad economics. It states that if you make the rich richer they will voluntarily redistribute their wealth without government intervention. This is BS and a recipe for the increasing gap between the rich and the not so rich. People who want to legislate a redistribution of weath so that the not so rich have something are called socialists.


    So what do you believe in?
    Trickle up? We can start with minimum wage workers giving to those making 30k /yr, those folks in turn can give to those making 40k/ yr and so forth.
    Does not make much sense does it?



    Quote:



    The sooner we start to think in terms of "we" rather than "me" the better off we will be. A prime example is health care in the US. A heart attack should not put someone into bankruptcy. Heathcare is a right not a privilege.


    If the government can fund roads and parks, the arts and the space program, buy $23.00 army helmets for 50 bucks, they can certainly from the entire tax base fund heathcare.

    The people who are against a national health care system are those who make money on the sick. What other reason can there be?

    Credit card companies are the HMO of the financal field.

    A right? Is it in the constitution?

    Why should a doctor, who goes into 6 figure debt to start a career at 30, make all that sacrifice to work for free? Same equation for nurses, dentists etc...
    You want free healthcare - take care of yourself for free.

    Why not make college a "right" and have all those with advanced teaching degrees and expertise in research just work for less or for "free"

    How about legal counsel as a "right" because we know lawyers don't need to make money.

    How about in housing as a "right" - make construction companys do it for less or for free.

    We know that quality of service is great when people are made to work for free.

    Why don't YOU start a movement, lead by example, and, hopefully YOU possess some skills, WORK FOR FREE. Yes, start trickling upward :D
  • Oct 17, 2008, 05:51 PM
    Merris
    So out of curiousity... who here is voting for Bob Barr?
  • Oct 17, 2008, 06:01 PM
    excon
    Hello Merris:

    Bob Barr is a Republican who holds many anti libertarian views. Ron Paul is a libertarian who's pretending to be a Republican.

    I'm voting for Obama.

    excon
  • Oct 17, 2008, 06:14 PM
    Merris
    Hey Ex...

    I quoted you by mistake and was in a hurry. I meant to just generally ask the question. Sorry!
  • Oct 18, 2008, 01:39 AM
    tomder55

    Ex ;as you know pay day lending is regulated at the States level . In 37 states it is legal and regulated to some degree by usury laws . In 13 states it is illegal. Georgia made it a felony.
  • Oct 20, 2008, 06:50 AM
    Iknowalotofstuff

    Points!! How does one acquire points? By using the card. How does one acquire sufficient points to use them? Air Miles is a good one. You must use your card substantially to have enough Air Miles to get to a destination. Then they want you to use the card while on vacation. There is method to their madness.
  • Oct 20, 2008, 06:58 AM
    tomder55
    You have to know how to work their system . I buy virtually everything on one credit card . So long as you pay it off (live within your means) you are not charged interest .I do not even accept credit from services with a fee.

    Yes Points accumulate . I fly free or at a discount . Yes I use the card while on vacation and pay it when due.
    It's a beautiful thing . I buy goods and services and if the timing is right ,pay it up to a month later for free! Who can argue with that ? Meanwhile my money works for me in the bank .
  • Oct 20, 2008, 07:08 AM
    excon
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Iknowalotofstuff View Post
    There is method to their madness.

    Hello again,

    Dude! You act as though you have no choice in the matter. Yes, they're very good at marketing their product... But, you can say NO!

    excon
  • Oct 20, 2008, 11:23 AM
    Iknowalotofstuff
    Everyone has responsibility both lender and borrower. Each should be responsible for their actions. Borrow too much.. pay the consequences. Lend too much... suffer the consequences. These consequences should not be passed on to others.

    Once again if I equate credit cards to cigarettes. The second hand smoke of credit cards is how indicriminate credit granting affects the people who do not abuse the credit. The citizens of the US who through their tax dollars will be paying this $7 B bailout are suffering the second hand smoke of the indiscriminate lending. The US taxpayer is paying for their mistakes.

    The solution from the government and the credit granting community is a $7 B bailout to compensate them for our mistakes. If an idividual company or individaulhad too much debt in the past, it went bankrupt. Maybe they should apply for a bailout too.

    What is the credit card industry's response to people not being able to pay their cards? Do they make it more difficult to get unsecured high interest credit? NO They lobby GW to make it more difficult to go bankrupt on debt they should have never had in the first place.
  • Oct 20, 2008, 11:37 AM
    Iknowalotofstuff

    By the way, there is a very easy way to deal with the problems in the stock market. Make profit on the stock market taxable as income not capital gains if the stock is sold within 30 days. As I understand it, the US taxes capital gains on only 50% of the gain.

    If I work and make $1000.00 this week, I pay tax on my gross earning of $1000.00. If I buy a stock (on margin or credit) and make a profit before I actually have to pay for that stock, only 50% of any profit is only taxable at the applicable rate. The poor guy who actually works pays a much higher rate than the guy who invested nothing (usually other peoples money). This does not seem fair.

    In addition to this solution, I suggest is to have a financial transaction tax at some minuscule part of 1% on every dollar that moves through the financial services sector. You know all of the moves that are made when we sleep. This would probably replace income and most other forms of tax.
  • Oct 21, 2008, 04:59 PM
    Galveston1

    Actually the problem is not with credit cards. The problem is that the borrower has no integrity. To borrow more than you know you can repay is basically dishonest. There was a time in this country when most men would rather die than default on a just debt. They had character, something sadly lacking today.
  • Oct 22, 2008, 01:17 PM
    simoneaugie

    Character?
    Are these principles taught in public education? How many eighth or ninth graders in the public school system can define character? Parents generally do not teach them much because the parents are both busy working to pay off debt they did not have the character to not get into.

    The problem is larger and actually not as mathematical as my bank account or that of a politician who makes a guaranteed income for life, after serving a term of four years. The problem is not so much about what's happening in the news. What is going on around the dinner table at home, and why?

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:44 AM.