Quote:
Originally Posted by
excon
...
For clarity sake, all that stuff about size, gender and state of drunkenness have NOTHING to do with whether a persons can defend themselves... Whoever got STRUCK by the first blow is the person who can defend him or herself, and getting a drink dumped on them IS the first blow.
...
Actually usually it does.
I asked about the state because usually state law spells out in detail when self-defense with a deadly weapon is available.
Maryland seems to be the exception. The only statute I can find is this:
"Md. CRIMINAL LAW Code Ann. § 3-209
...
TITLE 3. OTHER CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON
SUBTITLE 2. ASSAULT, RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT, AND RELATED CRIMES
...
§ 3-209. Defenses
A person charged with a crime under § 3-202, § 3-203, § 3-204, or § 3-205 of this subtitle may assert any judicially recognized defense."
In other words, it is a matter of case law.
Who landed the first blow may or may not be pertinent. What it comes down to is whether, considering all the circumstances, it is reasonable for the woman to use deadly force (and a knife is deadly force) to defend herself from punches. That's why I asked about such things as relative weight.
To repeat my extreme example, a very puny aggressor and a very powerflu and martially competent victim of the punches, might make the court decide that it was not reasonable for her to use the knife in self defense, even if he hit the first blow. But OP answered, making it evident that no such extreme situation applies. Therefore it is likely that she can claim self-defense.