Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Christianity (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=421)
-   -   Perhaps sex before marriage isn't the issue? (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=394217)

  • Sep 7, 2009, 08:21 AM
    Ashriel
    Perhaps sex before marriage isn't the issue?
    Hello all:

    Recently I have been struggling with the idea of abstinence. I have been with my boyfriend for a year and we have been intimate with each other. He is the only man I have been with.

    I have been told my whole life that "sex before marriage is a sin!" "you MUST wait until marriage or else you will get pregnant, get an std, cause serious emotional pain, ruin your future marriage!"

    Most of my life I have abided by this view, until being with my boyfriend. But recently I have been drawing closer to God, and the fact that me and my boyfriend have sex was something I wanted to seriously reconsider and research. So I looked it up in the Bible. I looked up every verse I could possibly find that had to do with sex, sexual immorality, and marriage.

    And surprisingly, I have not found ONE word saying you must wait until marriage to have sex. Rather, there are many many verses talking about sexual immorality (Acts 15:20; 1Corinthians 5:1; 6:13, 18; 10:8; 2 Corinthians 12:21; Galatians 5:19; Ephesians 5:3; Colossians 3:5; 1 Thessalonians 4:3; Jude 7).

    Generally, sexual immorality is referred to as sex with relatives, animals, those of the same sex, sex as a religious ceremony/worship, and sex with strangers/casual sex.

    So I'm going to throw out this theory, and I'm sure there will be many of you screaming about it, but what if the Bible in all it's glory isn't saying you absolutely HAVE to wait until marriage, but rather that it is much MUCH better if you do? Avoid sexual immorality such as sleeping around with everyone, abusing your body in sex with people you should not be having sex with, etc?

    I just know there is never a commandment stated "Wait until marriage to have sex." Just a lot of verses about avoiding sexual immorality. Keeping your body as a temple. Is having sex with someone you are deeply in love with and committed to a sin? I just don't see it in the Bible.

    Also: in the Old Testament, there are commands that a woman must be a virgin before marriage. Isn't this a tradition so the father would know without a doubt his children were carrying on his lineage? Because heredity and lineage were of the utmost importance in ancient times. There is never a word saying the male must be a virgin before marriage.

    I'm looking forward to hear your comments! :-)
  • Sep 7, 2009, 08:26 AM
    Ashriel

    P.S.
    I believe God views sex as an intimate, binding act between two people.
    I never mean to say that sex should be viewed as anything less than that.
    Which is why, most definitely, the best way to go is to wait until marriage.
    But if two people are going to get married, is it wrong to have sex before the official government signing of papers or the family ceremony?
    Just wanting to hear people's thoughts!
  • Sep 7, 2009, 09:33 AM
    artlady

    I think when we meet the right person and we are in love ,that it is a gift from God.
    I don't think a paper sanctions that.Commitment comes from the heart and a marriage is a contract made in love not law.
    There is a huge leap between promiscuity and giving yourself wholly to one person.
    I do not think it is a sin.
  • Sep 7, 2009, 09:40 AM
    cadillac59

    Of course there is nothing wrong with sex before marriage. People don't need a license to have sex, which is all the notion of marriage ever was anyway. It's an anachronism that belongs with all the rest of the garbage in the bible.

    If you want to find moral teaching the last place to find it is in a book written by ignorant Middle Eastern sheepherders who thought the earth was flat and feared they didn't know who their true fathers were, which is why they adopted their repressive anti-sex moral code. They also thought that slavery and genocide were moral, just to show you how wacko they were.
  • Sep 7, 2009, 09:58 AM
    firmbeliever
    I realize this is the Christian board,but we seem to have similar value systems I would like to comment on this.

    I think the reason why the Almighty sent the rule sex before marriage as something disliked and/or prohibited is ;

    For one thing it leads to so many social problems, single parenthood- which is one of the hardest things considering the hard work it takes to earn a little money and it is all gone in an instant and we want the best for our kids.
    Another thing is that many babies are abandoned whether into the social system or they are neglected while living at home with the parents because they were/are not ready for a baby or never wanted that much of a commitment.
    These babies grow up to be sometimes messed up adults and what happens to them?They either destroy their lives or others or spend parts of their lives in jails,detention centres. I am not generalizing, some do survive hard family lives and come out better than some well looked after kids too.
    The diseases related to promiscuity or having multiple partners, one of them being AIDs.
    Abortions because many couples are ready to have a relationship but do not want the burden of a baby.

    When we look at the bigger picture, casual sex does lead to a lot of problems which has far reaching consequences which I think is the reason that such a moral standard is required of the believers.
  • Sep 7, 2009, 01:38 PM
    Ashriel
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by cadillac59 View Post
    Of course there is nothing wrong with sex before marriage. People don't need a license to have sex, which is all the notion of marriage ever was anyway. It's an anachronism that belongs with all the rest of the garbage in the bible.

    If you want to find moral teaching the last place to find it is in a book written by ignorant Middle Eastern sheepherders who thought the earth was flat and feared they didn't know who their true fathers were, which is why they adopted their repressive anti-sex moral code. They also thought that slavery and genocide were moral, just to show you how wacko they were.

    Hi Cadillac:

    I totally get what you are saying, but the majority of stuff written about sexual immorality, that a lot of Christians base their views on, is in the New Testament, which was written by fairly educated men around 46-70 AD, definitely not ignorant people. I'm not talking so much about the Old Testament, which was written by the Middle Eastern sheepherders :-)

    Also, EVERYbody in that time thought the earth was flat and found it important to know who their father was. And, most everybody also thought slavery and genocide were moral. Slavery and genocide have been part of nearly every culture.
    Honestly, the Old Testament does have a lot of rules and guidelines that seem odd to us, but in those ancient times, they were very progressive and a good way to keep people from making bad choices, to keep an upright society. I know that some of it seems harsh and unfair, but this was all before the atoning blood of Jesus came to make those stringent rules unnecessary.

    I myself sometimes am left wondering "Why was God so cruel in those ancient times? Why did he call for a girl to be stoned simply because she was found to not be a virgin when she got married?"
    I don't pretend to understand it completely, but I trust God and know ultimately He has, and had, our greatest good at heart.
    It takes a leap of faith, that's for sure.
    I appreciate your comment though, Cadillac!
    Wishing you a beautiful day,
    Ashriel

    p.s. maybe I'll start a separate thread here in Christianity about the angry, violent, rule-enforcing God of the Old Testament versus the loving, compassionate one of the New Testament. I've often wondered about that. :-)
  • Sep 7, 2009, 05:50 PM
    classyT

    Ash,

    Sweetie, you know as a Christian I could never advise you to do something that God said NO to. The Bible is clear as crystal on the issue. God says what he means and he means what he says.

    I battled this when I was a young woman in my 20's and madly in love.( or so I thought) I wanted it to be OK. I even sought other so called believers who would tell me it was OK. I knew the ones to consult and the ones NOT to consult.. ha.

    I believe and have experienced when you go outside of God's word you only harm yourself. There are many reasons not to have sex before you marry. People will give you many reasons you SHOULD have sex outside of marriage. But if you believe that God made you, knows you intimately and is only looking out for your good then you are going to have to trust Him in this matter.

    It isn't the answer you wanted but according to the Bible... it is the correct one. AND.. one last thought. Obedience to the word of God always brings blessing... evidently. Disobedience always brings regret or worse.
  • Sep 7, 2009, 06:05 PM
    Alty

    Personally I see nothing wrong with sex before marriage. If you're in love, aren't sleeping around, then where in the bible is that wrong?

    A marriage certificate doesn't make you any more committed then you are now, it's just binds you together legally.

    Of course, if you're really this worried about it, just get married. Problem solved. :)
  • Sep 7, 2009, 07:29 PM
    cadillac59
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Altenweg View Post
    Personally I see nothing wrong with sex before marriage. If you're in love, aren't sleeping around, then where in the bible is that wrong?

    A marriage certificate doesn't make you any more committed then you are now, it's just binds you together legally.

    Of course, if you're really this worried about it, just get married. Problem solved. :)

    Yes, and what is a "marriage" anyway? What makes it so? Must it be legally sanctioned in your jurisdiction to count? What about a civil marriage, no priest or pastor involved, do they count? Why if marriage has this important Christian meaning to it (i.e. to legitimize sex, which is all it does in this religion and others)?

    It's all nonsense and crazy. Listening to what some religious nuts thought 2000 years ago and saying we have to follow it today.
  • Sep 7, 2009, 07:37 PM
    Fr_Chuck

    I have debated deleting Cadillac answers since he is misleading people greatly, He is not a christian and giving people non christian answers.

    He tells you what the world believes and teaches and not what the bible teaches.
  • Sep 7, 2009, 07:43 PM
    cadillac59
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Fr_Chuck View Post
    I have debated deleting Cadillac answers since he is misleading people greatly, He is not a christian and giving people non christian answers.

    He tells you what the world beleives and teaches and not what the bible teaches.

    Are you afraid of the possibility that some people may change their minds about what they believe?
  • Sep 7, 2009, 07:59 PM
    Alty
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by cadillac59 View Post
    Yes, and what is a "marriage" anyway? What makes it so? Must it be legally sanctioned in your jurisdiction to count? What about a civil marriage, no priest or pastor involved, do they count? Why if marriage has this important Christian meaning to it (i.e., to legitimize sex, which is all it does in this religion and others)?

    It's all nonsense and crazy. Listening to what some religious nuts thought 2000 years ago and saying we have to follow it today.

    I can only assume that marriage back then meant a lot more then it does now.

    Nowadays people get divorced at the drop of a hat, yes, even Christians.

    So, you can have multiple sex partners because you married all of them.

    How is that any different then pre-marital sex? If you don't stay with the one person
    Does it really matter if you had a piece of paper saying that you're legally bound to
    Each other?
  • Sep 8, 2009, 09:30 AM
    classyT
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Fr_Chuck View Post
    I have debated deleting Cadillac answers since he is misleading people greatly, He is not a christian and giving people non christian answers.

    He tells you what the world beleives and teaches and not what the bible teaches.

    Fr_Chuck,

    I actually agree with you. I even suggested that if someone really wanted to answer the question and wasn't a Christian than they should at least say so up front. I was given a big fat reddie for THAT thought by an "expert" on AMHD. Lol It was just my opinion but apparently it wasn't a popular one.
  • Sep 8, 2009, 09:35 AM
    classyT
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by cadillac59 View Post
    Are you afraid of the possibility that some people may change their minds about what they believe?

    Caddy,

    I can only speak for myself... I'm not afraid someone will change their mind about what they believe. NOT AT ALL. I just think when someone posts a question on the Christian board and they specify they want a christian answer, that you should let them know up front that what you have to offer for an answer.. isn't "Christian" or in any way biblical.
  • Sep 8, 2009, 09:40 AM
    classyT
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Altenweg View Post
    I can only assume that marriage back then meant a lot more then it does now.

    Nowadays people get divorced at the drop of a hat, yes, even Christians.

    So, you can have multiple sex partners because you married all of them.

    How is that any different then pre-marital sex? If you don't stay with the one person
    does it really matter if you had a piece of paper saying that you're legally bound to
    eachother?

    Alty,

    The God of the Bible says not to have sex before marriage. Even if we as humans don't see the importants of a piece of legal paper between couples, God apparently DOES. Divorce is another issue and there are guidelines for Christians concerning divorce too.

    According to the Lord it all matters to him. I think Christians and Non Christians take it too lightly. I know I have.
  • Sep 8, 2009, 12:32 PM
    galveston

    Ashriel,

    Look up all the references to "fornication".

    Now look up the definition of "fornication".

    You now have your answer.
  • Sep 8, 2009, 02:08 PM
    classyT

    Gal,

    EXACTLY! The thing is when we have are will set on something we want... we have a tendency to want to rewrite the Bible or pull it out of context or say it has no validity because the book is so old and outdated. But God's mind still hasn't changed on the issue of sin. I have to remind myself of this too.
  • Sep 9, 2009, 11:34 AM
    Ashriel
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by galveston View Post
    Ashriel,

    Look up all the references to "fornication".

    Now look up the definition of "fornication".

    You now have your answer.


    Actually, my Bible doesn't have the word "fornication" in it.
    It talks a lot about "sexual immorality" instead.
    I have the NIV version.
  • Sep 9, 2009, 11:40 AM
    galveston
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Ashriel View Post
    Actually, my Bible doesn't have the word "fornication" in it.
    It talks a lot about "sexual immorality" instead.
    I have the NIV version.

    Too bad you are using a less reliable Bible, but fornication is certainly included under "sexual immorality".
  • Sep 9, 2009, 12:49 PM
    rnrg

    I agree with ClassyT. I believe God created intimacy to be shared between a husband and a wife. It was designed by Him to be something beautiful to share with your husband/wife. What happens if a person thinks that each boyfriend or girlfriend is "the one" and they share sex with them. It is no longer beautiful or special.

    Hebrews 13:4 (NIV) says that Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral.

    We can't go around trying to make the Bible say what we want it to just to accommodate our needs. Sexual immorality covers everything from sexual immoral thoughts to the act itself outside of marriage.

    We can always depend upon God to give us the RIGHT answer if we will only ask Him and then wait. He is known for His perfect answers that line up with His Word. When in doubt, always, always ask God. Rita
  • Sep 9, 2009, 12:57 PM
    ohsohappy

    I really don't think a piece of paper should be the definition of marriage. Alty was right, Even when people do get married, they can fall out of love very quickly and divorce. Does that mean that their sex was a sin? If two people are wholly devoted to one another, God will recognized that as well. Sure sometimes people will "re writed the bible"
    But guess what? Every denomination of christianity interprets the bible differently in one way or another, that may conflict with another way of believeing. Everyone re-writes the bible.
  • Sep 9, 2009, 03:42 PM
    Ashriel
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by galveston View Post
    Too bad you are using a less reliable Bible, but fornication is certainly included under "sexual immorality".

    Ummm... less reliable Bible?
    I'm choosing to ignore that statement. What exactly is a reliable version to you? Original Greek scrolls?

    :confused:
  • Sep 9, 2009, 03:56 PM
    Alty

    Ashriel, the problem with organized religion is that everyone thinks their way is the only way.

    You have to follow your own path. If that path includes the bible, then fine, you have to decide what it says, just like everyone else.

    Everyone on this site, everyone you meet will tell you what they think they bible says.

    This is the reason that I believe in God but don't follow the bible.
  • Sep 10, 2009, 02:48 PM
    galveston
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Altenweg View Post
    Ashriel, the problem with organized religion is that everyone thinks their way is the only way.

    You have to follow your own path. If that path includes the bible, then fine, you have to decide what it says, just like everyone else.

    Everyone on this site, everyone you meet will tell you what they think they bible says.

    This is the reason that I believe in God but don't follow the bible.

    This sounds strange to me.

    Quick! Tell me what you know about Yaweh or Jesus WITHOUT referencing the Bible. What other source do you have?
  • Sep 10, 2009, 02:52 PM
    Alty
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by galveston View Post
    This sounds strange to me.

    Quick! Tell me what you know about Yaweh or Jesus WITHOUT referencing the Bible. What other source do you have?

    What other source?

    My beliefs, that's what.

    I believe that God, along with science, created the earth, but after that he just sat back and watched.

    He doesn't interfere with his creation. Why would he, he's God.

    I've read the bible, I went to Catholic school for 10 years and that was enough to convince me that it's just a well written (although often contradictory) book written by men and what they believe.

    The ten commandments, for instance, are a great reference, good rules to live by. Sadly, the majority of people break at least one if not more in their lifetime.

    Heck, Christians break a commandment every time they go to church and worship in a building with statues of Jesus on the cross. Or do you not know that commandment?

    Still confused? I'm a Deist.
  • Sep 10, 2009, 03:16 PM
    galveston
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Altenweg View Post
    What other source?

    My beliefs, that's what.

    I believe that God, along with science, created the earth, but after that he just sat back and watched.

    He doesn't interfere with his creation. Why would he, he's God.

    I've read the bible, I went to Catholic school for 10 years and that was enough to convince me that it's just a well written (although often contradictory) book written by men and what they believe.

    Give ma a scrap of evidence to prove this statement.

    The ten commandments, for instance, are a great reference, good rules to live by. Sadly, the majority of people break at least one if not more in their lifetime.

    Have you not read that our God forgives those who ask for forgiveness?

    Heck, Christians break a commandment every time they go to church and worship in a building with statues of Jesus on the cross. Or do you not know that commandment?

    Still confused? I'm a Deist.

    I'm not confused. You are.

    You attended a Catholic school, read the Bible, etc, and you claim they did not influence your beliefs, or influence your thinking?

    Without the Bible you would have no idea of what Yaweh or Jesus are like. You might be only dimly aware that there even IS any god of any kind.

    You could, of course, look at the universe and realize that there had to be a creator though you would know nothing about His character.

    As to your reference to statues, I am one of millions of Christians who do NOT worship in a building with statues, candles, etc.
  • Sep 10, 2009, 03:41 PM
    Alty
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by galveston View Post
    I'm not confused. You are.

    You attended a Catholic school, read the Bible, etc, and you claim they did not influence your beliefs, or influence your thinking?

    Without the Bible you would have no idea of what Yaweh or Jesus are like. You might be only dimly aware that there even IS any god of any kind.

    You could, of course, look at the universe and realize that there had to be a creator though you would know nothing about His character.

    As to your reference to statues, I am one of millions of Christians who do NOT worship in a building with statues, candles, etc.


    The bible has nothing to do with my beliefs, believe what you want.

    You're going off topic.

    I will not discuss my beliefs with you, or why I believe what I do.

    I have no desire to argue about who's right and who's wrong. Believe what you
    Want, that's your right, as it is my right to believe what I choose.

    This is the same old song and dance. We've been her before and gotten no where,
    So why go there again?
  • Sep 12, 2009, 09:23 PM
    cadillac59
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by galveston View Post
    I'm not confused. You are.

    You attended a Catholic school, read the Bible, etc, and you claim they did not influence your beliefs, or influence your thinking?

    Without the Bible you would have no idea of what Yaweh or Jesus are like. You might be only dimly aware that there even IS any god of any kind.

    You could, of course, look at the universe and realize that there had to be a creator though you would know nothing about His character.

    As to your reference to statues, I am one of millions of Christians who do NOT worship in a building with statues, candles, etc.

    It sound like he/she is a deist. What's so strange about that? The founding fathers of the US were mostly deists, which is one reason they were able to put together a fairly decent government. You don't need to believe in Yahweh or whatever you call it to believe in a god.
  • Sep 13, 2009, 02:16 PM
    galveston
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by cadillac59 View Post
    It sound like he/she is a deist. What's so strange about that? The founding fathers of the US were mostly deists, which is one reason they were able to put together a fairly decent government. You don't need to believe in Yahweh or whatever you call it to believe in a god.

    You keep making the false claim that the fathers of the US were mostly Deists.

    I have posted more than once the religious affiliations of the founding fathers, and there were only two or three Deists among them. Get your facts straight.

    Off topic, of course.
  • Sep 13, 2009, 09:41 PM
    cadillac59
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by galveston View Post
    You keep making the false claim that the fathers of the US were mostly Deists.

    I have posted more than once the religious affiliations of the founding fathers, and there were only two or three Deists among them. Get your facts straight.

    Off topic, of course.

    Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine were definitely not Christians. They were all too smart for that. Deists at best.
  • Sep 16, 2009, 06:43 PM
    Golden_Girl
    Ashriel my belief is that our bodies, our souls, our minds, and our spirits are the temple of God, regardless of human religious labels we may call ourselves in the end it is our beliefs and our dedication to God, as we still belong to Him and Him alone, as we were all created by Him. So who knows if there were actually scriptures that were also directed to men to also keep themselves pure. As it could have been written there long ago and no longer present since the bible has gone through numerous of changes, additions, alterations, and deletions, and continuously being rewritten throughout the centuries for various reasons.

    Sex goes beyond the being physical, as it is also deeply spiritual, souful, and psychological. When two people choose to have sex, their spirits are now intertwined. The world will pressure you and say that it does not matter, but it does matter and it can also come with a cost for both man and woman as God will judge us equally as we all must follow the Ten Commandments and is considered a sin.
  • Sep 23, 2009, 11:42 PM
    arcura
    Most of the 8 bibles I have use the word fornication which is sex before marriage.
    In the bible it says that fornication is immoral before God.
    That is do believe.
    Peace and kindness,
    Fred
  • Sep 27, 2009, 08:51 AM
    elscarta
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Ashriel View Post
    Ummm...less reliable Bible?
    I'm choosing to ignore that statement. What exactly is a reliable version to you?? Original Greek scrolls?

    :confused:

    Why are you choosing to ignore that statement? Do you think that all translations of the Bible are equally valid? The fact that you are asking the question about sex before marriage not being in the Bible shows that version of the Bible that you use does NOT translate the original Greek word "porneia" to "fornication" - which predominantly means sex before marriage, but can include other forms of illicit sexual behaviour.

    Instead it uses the term "sexual immorality". I personally think that this phrase is a bad choice for the translation as what is considered sexually immoral can vary greatly between individuals and societies and even changes with time. This leads to people like you thinking that it is OK to "throw out this theory" of premarial sex when it is strictly against God's plan for humankind.
  • Sep 27, 2009, 10:04 AM
    sndbay

    We have the commandment of adultery, and if you review
    (Matthew 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart)

    The Word of God teaches us the laws of sin. Review this video:
    The Way of the Master

    The disciple Paul feared, lest by any means as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. (1 Corinthians 11:3)


    Have you been beguiled, would be the question to answer..
  • Sep 27, 2009, 10:04 PM
    arcura
    The word adultery IS found in most if not all majorly accepted version of the bible as sndbay pointed out.
    That also includes the word fornication or fornicate.
    The bible does say that sex before marriage is a sin.
    Peace and kindness,
    Fred
  • Sep 28, 2009, 02:05 PM
    Ashriel
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by arcura View Post
    The word adultery IS found in most if not all majorly accepted version of the bible as sndbay pointed out.
    That also includes the word fornication or fornicate.
    The bible does say that sex before marriage is a sin.
    Peace and kindness,
    Fred

    Adultery is defined as being married, and having sex with someone other than your spouse. I'm not married and neither is my love, so we cannot be defined as adulterers.

    So if I'm having sex with the man I'll be with forever, the first man I've ever had sex with, the person I am committed to for life, I find it hard to think that is wrong. And no, we aren't financially and economically recognized as legally married.

    I totally believe sexual immorality is wrong. I believe adultery is wrong. I believe twisting the wonderful creation of sex to anything less than a celebration of love and intimacy is wrong.

    There was a time a long time ago that I met up with random guys and went too far with them, almost to sex but not quite. That was incredibly wrong, disgusting, and immoral. That was taking sex and throwing it into the dirt, using it as something lustful and selfish.

    I believe there is evidence that God views the sexual act itself as the marriage. When two people come together and have sex for the first time, with each other, they are married in the eyes of God. They have become one flesh.

    In Biblical times, during Jewish wedding ceremonies, sex was marriage. All that needed to be worked out were the legal and financial consequences.

    I have been praying and reading the Word and thinking about this a lot.
    I know that I don't want to move in together with my love before we get married. Because I want that to be something special in our marriage. But then I think, perhaps sex should be something that is special in marriage as well? But what if we are already married in God's eyes because we have had sex?

    I don't know, I'm mostly just really confused about this.
    On the one hand, I can't feel bad about having sex with the love of my life, just because our situations don't allow for marriage right now.
    On the other, I want to make our future marriage the best it can be, and perhaps waiting for the signing of the papers, making a marriage in the eyes of the government, would be best. Waiting until we have spoken those words of commitment, forever.

    And, we have tried waiting, and it was incredibly difficult. Going from two people who give freely, 100% of themselves to each other, to holding back, is difficult.
  • Sep 28, 2009, 03:12 PM
    Alty

    Okay, question for the Christians on this board and no, I'm not trying to stir the poo, I seriously don't know and would like your views on this.

    Back when the bible was written there were no legal documents to pronounce marriage, so what did a couple have to do to be considered married?

    Was a ceremony performed, Were there witnesses? Was something signed, or did they just pronounce their intentions toward each other and that was that?

    I think that this is something to keep in mind. After all, in today's world marriage is more of a legal thing, something people do in order to combine assets, raise children with the same last name, etc. etc. Many times religion doesn't even enter into it, so what about those people who aren't married before God but married in a courthouse? The definition of marriage is very important here.

    So, what does the bible mean when it says no sex before marriage? What constitutes marriage?
  • Sep 28, 2009, 05:37 PM
    sndbay
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Altenweg View Post
    Okay, question for the Christians on this board and no, I'm not trying to stir the poo, I seriously don't know and would like your views on this.

    Back when the bible was written there were no legal documents to pronounce marriage, so what did a couple have to do to be considered married?

    Was a ceremony performed, Were there witnesses? Was something signed, or did they just pronounce their intentions toward each other and that was that?

    Scripture has it written in Luke 2 that Caesar Augustus, enforced that all the world should be taxed. So man was registered according to their land, lineage, and family. This type of registering was held record to all families, and included the family plus birth of Christ Jesus.

    Before the time frame of the NT, what is written of according to scripture is the laws of God. And a wife was betroth

    The priesthood was known to the Levites, and all tribes were not to marry outside their own lineage. (However this was a problem, and was so called a curse for not doing the Will of God)

    We can also read of weddings, and invitations to a wedding, that examples there was a gathered celebration, with witnesses ect..

    I hope this will help in someway to answer the question in mind.


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Altenweg View Post

    I think that this is something to keep in mind. After all, in today's world marriage is more of a legal thing, something people do in order to combine assets, raise children with the same last name, etc. etc. Many times religion doesn't even enter into it, so what about those people who aren't married before God but married in a courthouse? The definition of marriage is very important here.

    So, what does the bible mean when it says no sex before marriage? What constitutes marriage?

    I trust God would recognize a joining of two, as to lie with one another as the scripture does say. But it does say to build a house or live as one joined.

    HOWEVER what constitutes sin or adultery? If you are seriously looking to the scripture and word of God then we have to reference: (Matthew 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart)
  • Sep 28, 2009, 06:17 PM
    elscarta
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Ashriel View Post
    I believe there is evidence that God views the sexual act itself as the marriage. When two people come together and have sex for the first time, with each other, they are married in the eyes of God. They have become one flesh.

    This is not true.

    Deuteronomy 22:13 If a man takes a wife and, after lying with her,

    Shows that a couple are considered married before they have sex with each other.

    Also if what you assert was true, then fornication (sex before marriage) would not exist, but as shown in many of the previous responses, many translations of the Bible use the word fornication and describe God detesting it.

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Ashriel View Post
    I know that I don't want to move in together with my love before we get married. Because I want that to be something special in our marriage. But then I think, perhaps sex should be something that is special in marriage as well?? But what if we are already married in God's eyes because we have had sex?

    It appears that you place sharing a house together more highly than sharing yourself. Surely the most important and special thing that a husband and wife can give each other is each other in body, mind and spirit? There is no perhaps about it!

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Ashriel View Post
    On the one hand, I can't feel bad about having sex with the love of my life, just because our situations don't allow for marriage right now.
    On the other, I want to make our future marriage the best it can be, and perhaps waiting for the signing of the papers, making a marriage in the eyes of the government, would be best. Waiting until we have spoken those words of commitment, forever.

    Why doesn't your situation allow for marriage right now?
    And yes, speaking the words of commitment, publicly and in front of God is what constitutes a marriage, a covenant between two people.
  • Sep 28, 2009, 06:31 PM
    Alty

    Quote:

    (Matthew 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart)
    Then every man I know has committed adultery.

    As for the rest, yes, that is what I was looking for. Does the courthouse marriage count though?

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:35 PM.