Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Christianity (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=421)
-   -   Baptism of John vs. Baptism of Christ? (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=385178)

  • Aug 9, 2009, 07:38 PM
    JoeT777
    Baptism of John vs. Baptism of Christ?
    Baptism of John, “preaching the baptism of penance, unto remission of sins”

    Versus

    Baptism of Christ, " baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost"


    On another thread concerning baptism a few interesting questions came up:

    1) Did Jesus’ baptism have the same effect as John's baptism?
    2) Would John’s baptism meet the requirements of your Church?
    3) Was John’s baptism salvific? Would the recipients of John’s baptism need to be re-baptized?
    4) Was John’s baptism related to the Old Testament TaNaKH, a Jewish immersion?
    5) What are the effects of the New Testament baptism?
    6) As a norm is it possible to enter heaven (the Kingdom of God) without a literal baptism?
    7) What are exceptions to the norm?
    8) Does baptism make the recipient a member in the body Church?
    9) If the baptized individual changes denominations, is the individual re-baptized?
    10) Can I have multiple baptisms? If so why? If not why?

    One more question, do you see any element connecting the response to these question one to the other.

    JoeT
  • Aug 9, 2009, 07:53 PM
    N0help4u

    Here is basically everything I believe about baptism.

    What Does the Bible Say About Baptism? - AN OUTLINE OF BIBLICAL BAPTISM
  • Aug 9, 2009, 08:02 PM
    JoeT777
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by N0help4u View Post
    Here is basically everything I believe about baptism.

    What Does the Bible Say About Baptism? - AN OUTLINE OF BIBLICAL BAPTISM

    How do you explain the contradiction that "Baptism does not save nor necessary for salvation," with Christ's warning to Nicodemus, "I say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God?"

    JoeT
  • Aug 9, 2009, 08:07 PM
    Fr_Chuck

    Thanks for the start of the thread, I seldom start them myself.

    Yes I ask this but without going into denominational names ( and please lets not do that) I was required to be baptised about 4 times, I had to be into one church because I was as a infant, the next church did it "in Jesus name" but the next church did not accept baptisms by that church and they had to do it, using the works, Father , Son and Holy Spirit. Then another church required you be dunked three times at the saying of each word.

    To each of them if you were not baptised by their formula they did not accept it. That is why I asked it, since about 1/3 or so of the denominations today I doubt would accept Jesus baptism, because it was not in his name or in the name of the trinity and John was not a member of any specific denomination ( some require it to be their denomination only)
  • Aug 9, 2009, 08:13 PM
    N0help4u

    It is necessary as a symbol of your faith but baptism itself does not save you.
  • Aug 9, 2009, 09:36 PM
    JoeT777
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Fr_Chuck View Post
    Thanks for the start of the thread, I seldom start them myself.

    yes I ask this but without going into denominational names ( and please lets not do that) I was required to be baptised about 4 times, I had to be into one church because I was as a infant, the next church did it "in Jesus name" but the next church did not accept baptisms by that church and they had to do it, using the works, Father , Son and Holy Spirit. Then another church required you be dunked three times at the saying of each word.

    To each of them if you were not baptised by thier formula they did not accept it. That is why I asked it, since about 1/3 or so of the denominations today I doubt would accept Jesus baptism, because it was not in his name or in the name of the trinity and John was not a member of any specific denomination ( some require it to be thier denomination only)

    Really, Dunked three times?

    Add:But, would you consider each baptism valid, remitting all sins each time?

    JoeT
  • Aug 9, 2009, 09:43 PM
    JoeT777
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by N0help4u View Post
    It is necessary as a symbol of your faith but baptism itself does not save you.

    You might have missed the point of my question. John 3 Christ tells Nicodemus that he MUST be baptized in order to get into the Kingdom of God. Doesn’t this contradict that’s baptism is a symbol? Christ said YOU MUST.

    JoeT
  • Aug 9, 2009, 09:51 PM
    N0help4u

    Baptism is a spiritual thing Jesus was referring to like the condition of the repentant heart and his faith. Water baptism is the outward acknowledgment of the inner rebirth. So Jesus telling Nicodemus he has to be born again with the water and the spirit is a spiritual thing.
    The actual dunking in the water is the ceremonial part of it.

    Water baptism is clearly a FIGURE or TYPE of something which already took place in the heart of the believer the moment he/she was saved (1 Pet. 3:21). Water baptism is the ordinance representing the identification of the Christian with the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

    You are "crucified" (standing upright in water), you are "buried" (immersed into the water), and you are "resurrected into life" (raised out of the water). Water baptism then, is a picture of spiritual baptism as defined in Rom. 6:3-5 and 1 Corinthians 12:13. It is the outward testimony of the believer's inward faith. A sinner is saved the moment he places his faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. Baptism is a visible testimony to that faith.

    http://www.biblebelievers.com/DeMichele1.html
  • Aug 9, 2009, 10:06 PM
    JoeT777
    But he told the man twice - once figuratively; then flat out. He didn't say "be born upright". How could baptism be a visible testimony - it doesn't leave any marks like circumcision, which was an external testimony and an external grace. Isn't there anything internal in baptism? Does this mean you "faith" yourself into the Kingdom of God?

    JoeT
  • Aug 9, 2009, 10:13 PM
    N0help4u

    Baptism is an internal repentance and turning away and then you follow it up with physical testimony of water baptism.
    Why does there have to be some visible mark? It is a physical testimony to your inward faith.
  • Aug 9, 2009, 10:31 PM
    JoeT777

    Christ Himself requires it to enter the Kingdom of God, there are no exceptions indicated in the verse – there is no “less and except” so to speak; there is no “figuratively” spoken clause.

    Acts 2:38 clearly indicates that its for the remission of sins as you stated; in Acts 22:16 Be baptized, and wash away thy sins : in Acts 5:25 sqq. Because "Christ loved the Church, and delivered Himself up for it: that he might sanctify it, cleansing it by the washing of water in the word of life: that he might present it to Himself a glorious Church, not having spot or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.“ Not a spot or wrinkle, not actual sin or original sin washed away to be made holy: an infusion of supernatural graces that renders the recipient an adopted son of God. After all, what was Paul writing about in his epistle to the Romans.

    JoeT
  • Aug 10, 2009, 04:45 AM
    N0help4u

    So Gods hand is too short if somebody accepts God and then dies within days before they are able to get baptised?
  • Aug 10, 2009, 05:10 AM
    sndbay
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Fr_Chuck View Post
    Thanks for the start of the thread, I seldom start them myself.

    yes I ask this but without going into denominational names ( and please lets not do that) I was required to be baptised about 4 times, I had to be into one church because I was as a infant, the next church did it "in Jesus name" but the next church did not accept baptisms by that church and they had to do it, using the works, Father , Son and Holy Spirit. Then another church required you be dunked three times at the saying of each word.

    To each of them if you were not baptised by thier formula they did not accept it. That is why I asked it, since about 1/3 or so of the denominations today I doubt would accept Jesus baptism, because it was not in his name or in the name of the trinity and John was not a member of any specific denomination ( some require it to be thier denomination only)

    What has been learned in this for yourself? I ask this because I feel things happen again and again for us to gain our knowledge in what God is pressing as important. You obviously continued to questioned within your heart of faith each baptism, and trusted in man.

    We should remember what Christ said about coming to HIM when we thirst (John 4:10)

    Because it is also written traditions of man can spoil us (Col 2:8)

    In Faith I rest upon Christ, knowing that in Baptism those who bear witness of what is taking place within our spirit, and body. Scripture tells us refer: Bear Withness in Heaven1 John 5: 6-7 This is he that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; [not by water only,] but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is Truth. 7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
    Bear Witness on Earth
    1 John 5:8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

    Full Well Knowing
    Galatians 3:27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.

    This was shown in the Baptism of Christ (who was watching and who was pleased)
    1 John 5:9 If we receive the witness of men, the witness of God is greater: for this is the witness of God which he hath testified of his Son.

    I share this with you in hopes of HIS words being the instruction of truth and faith, to follow HIM and deny yourself in following man.

    `in Christ
  • Aug 10, 2009, 06:35 AM
    sndbay

    1 Peter 3:20-21 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ

    What I trust in this written word, is that One Baptism is as important as One Faith and One Lord.

    One Lord ( Shepherd and Bishop of our souls)

    One Faith (justified by the body and blood of Christ)

    One Baptism (New man who put on the body of Christ) begotten again.

    Romans 6:4 Therefore we are buried with Him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.

    Romans 6:7 For he that is dead is freed from sin.

    Romans 6:18 Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness.

    Those who do not have faith that they can not walk in newness of life(righteousness/a circumcised heart/ dead to sin) then they can be those who are double minded and do not rest in Christ and HIS worthyness to set us free from sin.

    Christ blood on the cross voided out the curse of sin. No longer are we held to sin but at liberty to chose life with Christ in righteousness. (set Free) Rejoice in the law of Faith..

    Should each dividual chose to walk in doubt and in sin, then they remain under the law. Being with the law that can bring them unto Christ when they do decide to circumcise their hearts in ONE Faith.

    The fulness of Christ in what scripture refer in strong meat does not come to infants, and in fact the babes of this world will give suck to milk. Christ said to His mother cry for those that give suck, because those who are weak and not of fulness in Christ.

    Hebrews 5:11 But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.

    I share this not to put a stumbling stone before anyone but to show that God is the power and dominion. It is trusting in Christ that we can rest, and Faith in Christ that sets us free.
  • Aug 10, 2009, 08:26 AM
    JoeT777
    How do you understand “freed from sin” Does this mean after baptism you are freed from original and actual sin; or once baptized there is no more sin; or once baptized sin committed isn't held against you?

    JoeT
  • Aug 10, 2009, 08:54 AM
    sndbay

    Col 1:1-2-3 If ye then be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God.Set your affection on things above, not on things on the earth.For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God.

    1 Cor 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.

    Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you, Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
  • Aug 10, 2009, 09:03 AM
    JoeT777
    Did you answer my question? Please explain if you did; I don't understand the relevance to the question.

    JoeT
  • Aug 10, 2009, 09:20 AM
    sndbay
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by JoeT777 View Post
    How do you understand “COLOR="darkred"]freed from sin

    Liberty to walk in the spirit, and righteously.Kept by the power of God as it is written. (1 Peter 1:5)

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by JoeT777 View Post
    Does this mean after baptism you are freed from original and actual sin;

    Christ once and for all, paid the price on the cross to set us Free from the curse of Adam. Having abolished in his flesh the enmity,and in baptism we are begotten again by Christ to be what God had created us to be, in HIS image .. Righteousness...

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by JoeT777 View Post
    or once baptized there is no more sin; or once baptized sin committed isn't held against you?

    JoeT


    1 John 3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.

    Romans 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
  • Aug 10, 2009, 09:22 AM
    sndbay
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by JoeT777 View Post
    Did you answer my question? Please explain if you did; I don't understand the relevance to the question.

    JoeT

    Do you believe the Word of scripture written in post #16?
  • Aug 10, 2009, 09:26 AM
    JoeT777
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by sndbay View Post
    1 John 3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.

    Romans 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

    So, are you saying that transgression is not acountable, otherwise what we know as 'once saved always saved'?

    JoeT
  • Aug 10, 2009, 09:31 AM
    N0help4u

    If you don't believe your transgressions are forgiven then you do not agree with Bible verses that say Jesus took all our sins and God forgives our sins?
  • Aug 10, 2009, 09:32 AM
    JoeT777
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by sndbay View Post
    Do you believe the Word of scripture written in post #16?

    Yes, but I don't see the relevance to the question how you view “freed from sin”. I think this is because there is a fundamental difference in how we view original sin and the efficacies of baptism.

    JoeT
  • Aug 10, 2009, 09:35 AM
    JoeT777
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by N0help4u View Post
    If you don't believe your transgressions are forgiven then you do not agree with Bible verses that say Jesus took all our sins and God forgives our sins?

    I didn't say sins couldn't be forgiven. I interpreted the remarks to say that once baptized transgressions were no longer held accountable - once saved always saved.

    JoeT
  • Aug 10, 2009, 09:42 AM
    N0help4u

    You still have to ask for forgiveness and learn from your mistakes and your sins.
    Its not an EZ pass of once saved always saved.
  • Aug 10, 2009, 09:54 AM
    JoeT777
    The fundamental difference in understanding that no man can enter the Kingdom of God until he has been baptized is found in the 'once saved always saved' reading of 'freed from sin'. Catholics hold that Romans 5 that original sin, “sin entered into this world and by sin death; and so passed upon all men” is how man is dead (man being both body and soul – a dead man is a man dead physically as well as having a soul that is dead – not in communion with God [that is “sin death = spiritual death]). Romans 6 shows how that original sin becomes dead in man through Christ, “old man is crucified with him” (the “old man” being the man with original sin and as such is dead). Lastly, we have Romans 7 which Paul tells us what is left after baptism, (a redemption from the consequences of sin, i.e. death), is concupiscence, “But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead.” Concupiscence is a strong desire to sin. Our redemption is in the formation of the conscience overcoming that desire to sin which derives its creation in the graces bestowed in baptism. Sanctifiaction is dervied in the fight against concupisence, if not then there is no free will. So, where is 'once saved always saved'?

    JoeT
  • Aug 10, 2009, 09:58 AM
    N0help4u

    You just summed it up and there is no once saved always saved in the sense you are speaking of.
  • Aug 10, 2009, 10:39 AM
    JoeT777
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by N0help4u View Post
    You just summed it up and there is no once saved always saved in the sense you are speaking of.

    As I recall, you were a proponent of “once saved always saved?”

    Regardless, am I right to presume that a physical baptism is a must?

    JoeT
  • Aug 10, 2009, 10:45 AM
    N0help4u

    No I was not a proponent once saved always saved.

    I was a if your name is written in the book of life God isn't erasing it BUT MANY people CLAIM they are saved when possibly they are not. Therefore their once saved doesn't apply.

    Like you buy a counterfit ticket for an event.
    You go to the event and you find out you were wrong. You NEVER had a legitimate ticket to begin with.

    So as I said in the sense you are using once saved always saved NOPE I do not believe in once saved always saved.
  • Aug 10, 2009, 10:49 AM
    sndbay

    What I trust in all that is written is the worthyness of Christ, and the truth of what HE brought to us.

    The sufficiency of Christ's body and blood is far more then what most men can comprehend, because of the enormous, the vast, the huge, the immense greatness that God is.
    As written, God thundereth marvellously with his voice; great things doeth he, which we cannot comprehend.

    It is also written refer: Eph 3:17-19 That Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith; that ye, being rooted and grounded in love, May be able to comprehend with all saints what is the breadth, and length, and depth, and height; And to know the love of Christ, which passeth knowledge, that ye might be filled with all the fulness of God.


    Romans 4:25 Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.

    In the beginning of creation, we were as written refer: Genesis 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

    This was what was before Adam, and NOW we are again begotten in Christ to the liberty of choice, to walk in the spirt and not the lust of flesh.

    Comprehend the reality of the valued life and death in what our Father has giving in HIS begotten Son to die for us.

    We can again be in the likeness of what we once were created to be. "IF" we hold to ONE LORD...ONE FAITH...ONE BAPTISM One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.


    Is it possible to sin or be beguiled by satan? YES
    That is what Paul said was his fear.
  • Aug 10, 2009, 01:54 PM
    JoeT777
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by sndbay View Post
    What I trust in all that is written [in scripture] is the worthiness of Christ, and the truth of what HE brought to us.

    As I trust in the infallible Magisterium of the Church to teach the truths the Apostles taught that are found therein.

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by sndbay View Post
    The sufficiency of Christ's body and blood is far more then what most men can comprehend, because of the enormous, the vast, the huge, the immense greatness that God is.
    As written, God thundereth marvellously with his voice; great things doeth he, which we cannot comprehend.

    Believing in the sufficiency of Christ's body and the truth found in Scripture then too we can believe in Christ's words, “except you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you. He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath everlasting life: and I will raise him up in the last day. For my flesh is meat indeed: and my blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood abideth in me: and I in him. ” (John 6: 54 sqq) What's of concern here isn't God's frightful omnipotence, His omnipresence, the vastness, the bigness, His perfect justice, but rather our impotence, our absence of faith, our lecherousness, covetousness, our cupidity, that hinders his real presence found in scripture.

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by sndbay View Post
    It is also written refer: Eph 3:17-19 That Christ mIn the promise also of God he staggered not by distrust: but was strengthened in faith, giving glory to God:ay dwell in your hearts by faith; that ye, being rooted and grounded in love, May be able to comprehend with all saints what is the breadth, and length, and depth, and height; And to know the love of Christ, which passeth knowledge, that ye might be filled with all the fulness of God.


    In the promise also of God he staggered not by distrust: but was strengthened in faith, giving glory to God: Romans 4:25 Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.

    But also for us, to whom it shall be reputed, if we believe in him that raised up Jesus Christ, our Lord, from the dead, (Romans 6:24)

    In the promise also of God he staggered not by distrust: but was strengthened in faith, giving glory to God: In the beginning of creation, we were as written refer: Genesis 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. [/QUOTE]
    And that promise can't be realized without being “born again of water and the Holy Ghost”.

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by sndbay View Post
    We can again be in the likeness of what we once were created to be. "IF" we hold to ONE LORD...ONE FAITH...ONE BAPTISM One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all. ...That is what Paul said was his fear

    Pope John Paul II said "fear not;"all is accomplished through the body and blood of Christ offered daily.


    JoeT
  • Aug 10, 2009, 01:56 PM
    JoeT777
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by N0help4u View Post
    Like you buy a counterfit ticket for an event.
    You go to the event and you find out you were wrong. You NEVER had a legitimate ticket to begin with.

    I like that analogy, at least on some levels I can agree with you.

    JoeT
  • Aug 10, 2009, 05:35 PM
    sndbay
    Joe, Have you intended damage to my posting by the quote done in #30 shown differently then what was posted in #29 ?


    Post #29
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by sndbay View Post
    We can again be in the likeness of what we once were created to be. "IF" we hold to ONE LORD...ONE FAITH...ONE BAPTISM One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.


    Is it possible to sin or be beguiled by satan? YES
    That is what Paul said was his fear.

  • Aug 10, 2009, 06:06 PM
    JoeT777
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by sndbay View Post
    Joe, Have you intended damage to my posting by the quote done in #30 shown differently then what was posted in #29 ?


    Post #29

    Not exactly, it's called using an ellipsis ( … ). Ellipses are used (among other things) to indicate omitted words in a quotation It's a common practice to remove lesser important comments to avoid excessively long citations. I didn't wish to address the intervening comments so I didn't include them. Plus there was a link to your comment. It would be obvious to any casual reader that there was no intent to misquote you. BUT, be that as it may, I apologize if you took it that way.

    JoeT
  • Aug 10, 2009, 09:15 PM
    JoeT777
    Fr_Chuck, et al:

    I was poking around on the internet and ran into, The Great Catechism (Part III, The Sacraments) by St. Gregory of Nyssa; circa 380 A.D. I thought that when you came up for a breath you might appreciate that a trine baptism may have been widely used in various regions. “But the descent into the water, and the trine immersion of the person in it, involves another mystery. For since the method of our salvation was made effectual not so much by His precepts in the way of teaching as by the deeds of Him Who has realized an actual fellowship with man, and has effected life as a living fact, so that by means of the flesh which He has assumed, and at the same time deified , everything kindred and related may be saved along with it, it was necessary that some means should be devised by which there might be, in the baptismal process, a kind of affinity and likeness between him who follows and Him Who leads the way. Needful, therefore, is it to see what features are to be observed in the Author of our life, in order that the imitation on the part of those that follow may be regulated, as the Apostle says, after the pattern of the Captain of our salvation.”

    After a little more poking around I found that a trine immersion may have been practiced by the Apostles. Tertullian (De Corona 3), St. Basil (On the Holy Spirit 27), St. Jerome (Against the Luciferians 8), all write of similar practices. However, while adding much the same St. Thomas Aquinas in his The Summa Theologica reminds us that one immersion has been ordained by the Church.

    Whether trine immersion is essential to Baptism?: On the contrary, Gregory wrote to the Bishop Leander: "It cannot be in any way reprehensible to baptize an infant with either a trine or a single immersion: since the Trinity can be represented in the three immersions, and the unity of the Godhead in one immersion."

    “I answer that, as stated above washing with water is of itself required for Baptism, being essential to the sacrament: whereas the mode of washing is accidental [essentially inherent] to the sacrament. Consequently, as Gregory in the words above quoted explains, both single and trine immersion are lawful considered in themselves; since one immersion signifies the oneness of Christ's death and of the Godhead; while trine immersion signifies the three days of Christ's burial, and also the Trinity of Persons.”

    “But for various reasons, according as the Church has ordained, one mode has been in practice, at one time, the other at another time. For since from the very earliest days of the Church some have had false notions concerning the Trinity, holding that Christ is a mere man, and that He is not called the "Son of God" or "God" except by reason of His merit, which was chiefly in His death; for this reason they did not baptize in the name of the Trinity, but in memory of Christ's death, and with one immersion. And this was condemned in the early Church. Wherefore in the Apostolic Canons (xlix) we read: "If any priest or bishop confer baptism not with the trine immersion in the one administration, but with one immersion, which baptism is said to be conferred by some in the death of the Lord, let him be deposed": for our Lord did not say, "Baptize ye in My death," but "In the name of the Father and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost."

    "Later on, however, there arose the error of certain schismatics and heretics who rebaptized: as Augustine (Super. Joan., cf. De Haeres. lxix) relates of the Donatists. Wherefore, in detestation of their error, only one immersion was ordered to be made, by the (fourth) council of Toledo, in the acts of which we read: "In order to avoid the scandal of schism or the practice of heretical teaching let us hold to the single baptismal immersion."

    From St. Thomas's quote we can safely extrapolate that two immersions would not be permitted. I don't have any direct knowledge, but would imagine the Church today accepts trine baptism, although it doesn't appear to be common. You certainly don't hear much of it around here - and I live in the land of the Baptist. So, the next time I speak out with a provincial ignorance it would be appreciated if you would help remove the foot from my mouth.

    JoeT
  • Aug 10, 2009, 10:22 PM
    Maggie 3
    Acts 1:4&5 Qnce when He was eating with them, He told them not to leave Jerusalem.
    He said, "Wait here to receive the promise from the Father which I told you about. John baptized people with water, but in a few days you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit".
    Notice in this passage Jesus spoke of two baptism, one already experienced and the
    Other future; thus carefully making it clear that the baptism with the Holy Ghost is not baptism with water but a totally different experience.
    Acts 1:8 He began His instructions by reminding them that even before His crucifixion
    He had told them that they were to receive the promise of the father which is the
    Baptism with the Holy Spirit. He had promised that the Holy Spirit would come to fill the
    Void created by His being no longer with them in the flesh, and that in the Spirt He
    Would be even closer to them after His earthly departure. In a real and wonderful
    Way this than if Jesus remained physically with them and they continued to see, hear,
    Touch or converse with Him in the flesh. The reason for this was that they would receive
    Power after the Holy Spirit had come upon them.

    Here is a part of the answer.
    Blessing,

    Maggie 3
  • Aug 10, 2009, 11:49 PM
    arcura
    Joe,
    In a Catholic Church in northwestern Montana I and others witness a baptism of a child who was dunked three times with the priest saying "In the name of the Father (dunk), The son (dunk) and the Holy Spirit (dunk).
    I did not question it. Rather I thought it was a neat way to do it.
    Also I do firmly believe that baptism by itself does not save but it is necessary if one it to be saved with an also necessary working faith and the grace of God.
    I was baptized in a Lutheran ceremony. 35 years later when I became a Catholic I was told that the Lutheran baptism was licit and therefore a second baptism was not necessary.
    However, I could have been, but the priest would then say during the ceremony. "Fred, if you are not properly baptized, I baptize you in the name of the Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit."
    I opted not to have a second baptism for it was not necessary.
    I do find it very interesting the confusion concerning baptism in various denominations.
    In the 30,000 + denominations out there I wonder how many different baptisms that there are when I and many others believe that there is only one way (in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) that is valid.
    Peace and kindness,
    Fred
  • Aug 11, 2009, 09:55 AM
    JoeT777
    Maggie: I agree, one of the primary purposes of the New Testament baptism is for a spiritual connection with the Holy Spirit. A joining, as it were, in spirit with God.

    Fred: I had never heard of 3 immersions at a baptism (that's why I find them so unique), but of course all of the baptisms I've ever attended (most of which were for infants) were Catholic and were poured over a fount. I have built Southern Baptist Churches in the past. Large pools with steps were installed behind the podium for an immersion to take place – but I never witnessed one. I understood these baptisms were single immersions.


    JoeT
  • Aug 11, 2009, 10:15 AM
    N0help4u

    Three immersions aren't in the Bible.
    People do that on their own for their own reasons/purposes
  • Aug 11, 2009, 10:21 AM
    sndbay
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by JoeT777 View Post
    As I trust in the infallible Magisterium of the Church to teach the truths the Apostles taught that are found therein.


    Believing in the sufficiency of Christ's body and the truth found in Scripture then too we can believe in Christ's words, “except you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you. He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath everlasting life: and I will raise him up in the last day. For my flesh is meat indeed: and my blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood abideth in me: and I in him. ” (John 6: 54 sqq) What's of concern here isn't God's frightful omnipotence, His omnipresence, the vastness, the bigness, His perfect justice, but rather our impotence, our absence of faith, our lecherousness, covetousness, our cupidity, that hinders his real presence found in scripture.

    JoeT

    His real presence found within the book John was told to eat in Revelation so that he would prophesy again before many peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kings according to the Word that was made Flesh to walk on earth.


    Different thread...but I will reply
    The Catholic church gives the glory to a different rock, so is their spiritual drink and meat that of their rock?

    1 Cr 10:1-2-3-4 Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; And did all eat the same spiritual meat; And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.
  • Aug 11, 2009, 10:42 AM
    sndbay
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by N0help4u View Post
    Three immersions aren't in the Bible.
    People do that on their own for their own reasons/purposes

    Do you think they may not believe in three being ONE? I find it strange, rather then by the doctrine of Christ.

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:55 AM.