Originally Posted by
Unknown008
I agree that baptism does not save. It is accepting Christ in our heart as lord and saviour which does.
I know that immersion is the actual tradition. I would understand too that if one is not completely immersed, the Lord will still honour it. That would be the case when one cannot be immersed totally, like for example, an handicapped would not be easily taken for water immersion, nor would a person suffering from a serious disease. But one who can spare the time for this, complete immersion is preferred. That's my opinion anyway, :)
And yes, Joe and Fred, the bible did not explicitly mentioned the baptism of infants.
If you look in Matt 28:19, you'll see that Jesus told his disciples to go through the nations, and make them disciples of God, and then baptise them in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.
I wonder how can an infant who doesn't understand yet his/her purpose on earth be a disciple... :rolleyes:
And what sndbay said is another reason. Jesus waited for so many years (30 years) to get baptized. Why not at his birth?