Originally Posted by
Wondergirl
Theology and philosophy don't mix well. No, the Identity of Indiscernibles is not a good starting point. Its Constitution Model is the only solution that seems to fits simply because of the notion of "relative sameness": It is possible that there are x, y, z, F, G, and H such that x is an F, y is an F, z is an F, x is a G, y is a G, z is a G, x is an H, y is an H, and z is an H, yet x is the same F as y, but x is not the same G as y, and so on. Since God is not material, this relative-sameness solution can only be an analogy.