Originally Posted by
dwashbur
The difference is that you're simply saying you don't know of any such beings or events. I'm saying I've had direct encounters and they scared the sh** out of me. Basically, you're giving an argument from silence, and those are some of the weakest kind. As they often say in the archaeology world, "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." And actually, there's all kinds of evidence to suggest that unbelievers do get harassed by demons. They just don't call it that. They find some other explanation.
excon, I don't know of anybody who has ever claimed a demon made them drive into a tree, or any of the other absurd scenarios you set forth. That's a straw man argument, and it's almost as weak as the argument from silence. The testimonial evidence is there for anybody who wants to evaluate it in an unbiased manner. Whether it convinces you or anybody else is irrelevant; it's still evidence, and in most cases it's eyewitness evidence. Do with it what you will, but the one thing you can't do is make it go away or cease to exist.