Quote:
Originally Posted by lobrobster
With just one very small difference... You have SEEN physical evidence that your earthly father exists! Just a small caveat, don't you think?
I have also seen what God has done in my life and it is wonderful to behold.
Quote:
Now I'll agree that you might be using faith to believe that your earthly father loves you. But I'm assuming you have evidence that he does such as the 'things he has done in your best interest'. This is what's called evidence. When you believe something with no evidence to go on, then it is called faith.
I have plenty of evidence of what God has done for me.
Quote:
Ugh, this is such a tired old line used by theists. I'm certainly not going to start a thread on a Christian forum defending atheists. Here's the difference and it's the last I'll say on the matter in this thread. Those atheists didn't kill people because they were atheists! They killed people because of a warped ideology that had nothing to do with whether there is or isn't a god. Atheism is not a belief. It's not a movement. It is the exact opposite. It's a LACK of belief. So it had nothing to do with atheism, but with ideologies such as white supremacy, communism, etc. that are not unlike a religion themselves. To prove my point, name me one wicked deed that could only be performed by an atheist and not a religious person. Now think of a wicked deed that could only be performed in the name of religion and not by an atheist. It's all too easy to think of a latter example.
Whatever the reason, the fact remains that atheists are the deadliest people in human history.
Quote:
Are you sure about this?
Yes, I'm sure:
843 The Catholic Church recognizes in other religions that search, among shadows and images, for the God who is unknown yet near since he gives life and breath and all things and wants all men to be saved. Thus, the Church considers all goodness and truth found in these religions as "a preparation for the Gospel and given by him who enlightens all men that they may at length have life."332
CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 843
Quote:
I don't understand that bit of scripture you quoted as meaning it's OK to worship false gods.
I don't either. Did I say it was OK to worship other gods?
Quote:
In fact, one of the ten commandments clearly states that thou shall have no other gods before me.
Yes, it does.
Quote:
Also, doesn't Christianity say you have to accept Jesus Christ as your Savior in order to receive salvation?
Some Christians believe that. But the Catholic Church teaches:
847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church:
Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.337
848 "Although in ways known to himself God can lead those who, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the Gospel, to that faith without which it is impossible to please him, the Church still has the obligation and also the sacred right to evangelize all men."338
Quote:
Are you saying that Christians don't believe Muslims will go to hell?
The Catholic Church teaches:
841 The Church's relationship with the Muslims. "The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind's judge on the last day."330
Quote:
Certainly Protestants do.
If you want to debate that with Protestants, go to it. I'm Catholic.
Quote:
Again, this is what I mean by interpretation. You guys need to get it straight. If YOU guys don't even understand it, how are we supposed to?
This from the man who can't seem to decide if he's atheist or agnostic.
Quote:
Technically, you could say I'm agnostic.
But you talk like an atheist. You continually insist that God doesn't exist, that you have no evidence of His existence and that we should share in your non-belief. Now suddenly, you aren't so sure.
If you are not certain that God exists, shouldn't you hedge your bets?
Quote:
I think that's the only rational position to have.
One man's opinion. I believe all three are rational positions, belief, non belief and uncertainty. But I believe that belief in God is the most rational because it is based on the best evidence.
In fact, your brand of agnosticism is more irrational than non belief. You proclaim loudly that there is no God, you proclaim loudly that you don't care what He thinks or does, you proclaim loudly all types of accusations against Him and His people. But when all is said and done, you say, "I'm really not certain."
I've met other agnostics who quite rationally behave in conformity with their beliefs. When asked, "If you aren't certain that God exists, why do you go to Church?" They answer, "Precisely because I'm not certain whether God exists. If He does exist, I'm covered."
The Scriptures say,
Ecclesiasticus 19 21 Better is a man that hath less wisdom, and wanteth understanding, with the fear of God, than he that aboundeth in understanding, and transgresseth the law of the most High.
Quote:
Those who say they know for sure there is no god are being just as irrational as those who say that they know for sure that there is.
Wrong. It is the person who says that he isn't sure if God exists but then acts as though God doesn't exist who is the most irrational of all.
Its very simple. Say you have a lottery ticket in your hand. And you just heard that the winning lottery ticket is held by a person in your town, your neighborhood and your household. Would you throw the lottery ticket away because you don't know if it's the winner?
Well, that's what you are doing. You admit that God might exist but you speak as though He doesn't. And you teach others that He doesn't thereby throwing away any possibility of living in eternity with the Being who can put you there.
There is only one position more irrational than yours, the person who claims to believe in God but acts as though God doesn't exist.
Quote:
The fact is, I do not know for sure that there is no god. But I also do not know for sure there are no such things as invisible fairies. Since the evidence for both is equally non-existent I take the position that it doesn't make much sense to base my life around either existing. The difference between you and I. is that if I were presented evidence that God existed, I would immediately change my position.
Not really. I was born Catholic, became atheist and now I am Catholic again. Why do you think I became Catholic again? As I said above, I have seen the evidence of God's existence.
The difference between you and I is that I was never agnostic.
Quote:
How could you ever change your position on God when you won't even change it in the face of the very valid scientific theory of evolution!
Do you want to discuss evolution? Ok, start with this, how did non living matter evolve into living matter? Remember, according to those scientiests who believe in evolution, nothing is true unless it can be reproduced in a laboratory. So please, create some life for me so that I may believe your "theory" of evolution.
Quote:
If you had lived a few centuries ago, you'd be among those who fought the idea that the earth wasn't the center of the universe.
Would I? Catholics were the first to believe that fact. In fact, it is a Catholic who discovered that fact, Copernicus.
So what makes you so sure that I wouldn't believe Copernicus? Maybe I would have been on of his Catholic assistants?
Quote:
Because when Bin Laden spoke for God on 9/11 thousands of Americans died. It can be dangerous. Why can't you understand that?
And when the Kmer Rouge killed so many millions, they spoke for atheists. Why can't you understand that?
And it is the teachings of Jesus Christ which abhor any such behavior and teach against it. Why can't you understand that?
Quote:
Again, I don't care. I care about people flying planes into our buildings. And people who think that they have a direct line to god and know what pleases Him. These are the people most likely to commit such an act. That's what I care about!
No, that is what you focus upon when you try to change the subject of a thread. The fact is that atheists are the most dangerous people in history. But apparently you don't care about that.
The original question asked of you was, "If you don't believe in God, why do you care if He is pleased by your deeds?" However, you've now admitted you are an agnostic and not an atheist.
Therefore the new question is this, "Since you believe that God might exist, why do you behave as though you are certain that He doesn't?"
Sincerely,
De Maria