Huh? I never get mad. Never have, never will.
![]() |
Where do we come to the understanding that Jonah was dead while inside the belly of the whale?Quote:
Most People Don't know that Jonah (literally)Died (while in the belly of the Fish)?
If not for psalms we could assume he was alive the entire time.
Here is the quote - AGAIN!
"I'm asking about the resurrection to point out that believing in that event while belittling the serpent in Genesis 3 strikes me as strange ."
These are Jl's words - lifted direct from his post #366. The deceit is all Jl's. He wants me to get over it and move on.
A talking reptile would be less deceitful than Jl. At least, the reptile would exhibit intelligence.
I'm sure this has been already brought up? What about the talking Donkey?Quote:
A talking reptile
Or is that another one of your allegories?
And once again, the quote you attributed to me ("(I) would belittle any answer (you) would come up with".) is not in there. But this will help you. It is a site that explains the concept of direct quotations. I suggest you read it several times because you REALLY need to. It will help you to stop making a public fool of yourself. I'm really surprised WG, the grammar expert (I guess) has not stepped in to rescue you. Good grief you sure need it.Quote:
Here is the quote - AGAIN!
"I'm asking about the resurrection to point out that believing in that event while belittling the serpent in Genesis 3 strikes me as strange ."
These are Jl's words - lifted direct from his post #366. The deceit is all Jl's. He wants me to get over it and move on.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_mark
Now should you reach the place where you can show in that paragraph any place I said, "(I) would belittle any answer (you) would come up with," then we can pick this back up. Until then I am done with arguing about a concept my fourth graders understood. And I am very sure that any person reading this will come to the same conclusion.
Here is your quote, word for word:
"I'm asking about the resurrection to point out that believing in that event while belittling the serpent in Genesis 3 strikes me as strange ."
No matter what nonsense you post, you can't get away from the fact these are YOUR words. As was said elsewhere, you are simply playing games with words in a desperate attempt to deny what you said.
Of course, they will. You can't undo what has been done - see the last paragraph in your post # 366.Quote:
And I am very sure that any person reading this will come to the same conclusion.
I am happy to report you have finally figured quotes out. You have stopped insisting that these are my words ((I) would belittle any answer (you) would come up with,") and figured out what my words really were. I feel as though we've had a minor victory in your education. Now that is not, of course, what you were insisting upon for the past few days. This is what we had then.Quote:
"I'm asking about the resurrection to point out that believing in that event while belittling the serpent in Genesis 3 strikes me as strange ."
No matter what nonsense you post, you can't get away from the fact these are YOUR words. As was said elsewhere, you are simply playing games with words in a desperate attempt to deny what you said.
In your own words - "...(I) would belittle any answer (you) would come up with". It's in post 371 if anyone wants to check it out. Now that was outrageous on the face of it since you had to supply "I" and "you" to complete my supposed quote. But now you have at least posted what I said to begin with. And in that quote, if you pay anything even approaching careful attention, you will note that I said YOU were the one doing the belittling. "...while belittling the serpent in Genesis 3..."
Whew!! I'm glad you finally learned that lesson. It's been a hard pull, but I think it's been worth it.
The serpent was a character in an allegory. The resurrection was the real deal.
And Athos has admitted that he made up the first quote he attributed to me. So yes, it has ended well. BTW, I never denied saying what you finally managed to figure out were my actual words. It was only the part where you said, "In your own words," but it was actually your made up words, including words you had to supply yourself in parenthesis, that I objected to. Now the real deal, where I said YOU were belittling a topic, was indeed mine, and I like it a lot!
You mean you’re not capable of one. Just when I think you are starting to understand quotations, you disappoint me again. It’s back to the fourth grade for, young fella! Can’t promote you until you get it!!
Study this very carefully. Test tomorrow!
https://www.thoughtco.com/direct-quotation-composition-1690461
You are wasting time! Study tonight. I hope to help you get to the place where you no longer publicly disgrace yourself in this manner. And trying to change the subject?? Looks really, really suspicious.
Remember now. Test tomorrow! Burn the midnight oil, young man.
Study!! Test tomorrow, little fella. You want to end up in third grade??
Here are some study notes. I'm doing all I can to help you. It's one of the biggest challenges I've ever had, but I'm doing the best I can with you.
Now you know this by tomorrow.Quote:
A direct quotation is a report of the exact words of an author or speaker and is placed inside quotation marks in a written work. For example, Dr. King said, "I have a dream."
Sample item. "If someone foolishly tries to represent this as a quote, "(I) would belittle any answer (you) would come up with," but then can't show where the quoted material occurred or can't explain why he had to supply words to make the supposed quote make sense, then can that person claim to understand anything at all about direct quotations?
a. Nope
b. Hardly
c. Nada
d. Nein
e. No way
f. All of the above
Not feeling good about your chances. Oh well. Good night, all.
Sample item. "If someone foolishly tries to represent this as a quote, "(I) would belittle any answer (you) would come up with," but then can't show where the quoted material occurred or can't explain why he had to supply words to make the supposed quote make sense, then can that person claim to understand anything at all about direct quotations?
a. Nope
b. Hardly
c. Nada
d. Nein
e. No way
f. All of the above
#2. If the person in the question above refuses to admit his error, then could his attempted deception be classified as a lie?
a. yes
b. yes
c. yes
#3. If the person in the question above attempts desperately to change the subject, would that show that he realized his error and is trying to run from it?
a. absolutely
b. absolutely
c. absolutely
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:30 PM. |