I'm glad TJ mentioned you in his(?) next post. I missed your message the first time around. Good question.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhadsen
De Maria,
To attempt to find scriptural support for purgatory you have appealed to Luke 16:24, 1 Peter 3:19, and 1 Corinthians 3:15. I checked out each verse carefully. Here is what I found:
Regarding the use of Luke 16:24, it seems that the fathers are in agreement that the rich man went to hell, not purgatory.
I don't think you've read all the Fathers. I'm pretty sure some of them must think it was Purgatory, because a man a bit more Catholic than I, Pope Benedict XVI says it is Purgatory in Spe Salve:
45. This early Jewish idea of an intermediate state includes the view that these souls are not simply in a sort of temporary custody but, as the parable of the rich man illustrates, are already being punished or are experiencing a provisional form of bliss. There is also the idea that this state can involve purification and healing which mature the soul for communion with God. The early Church took up these concepts, and in the Western Church they gradually developed into the doctrine of Purgatory.
"Spe Salvi" - Encyclical Letter of His Holiness Benedict XVI on Christian Hope
Considering that this man was also the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith before he was Pope. I think he knows a bit more about Catholic Doctrine than either you or I.
Quote:
Secondly, purgatory is supposedly a temporary state, yet Luke 16:26 indicates that the situation that the rich man finds himself in is permanent.
Where?
Quote:
In addition to that, as I understand it, the church teaches that only that those who die in God’s grace and friendship go to Purgatory. From the text it does not appear that such was the case for the rich man.
On the contrary, in the text, Dives calls St. Abraham, "Father" and Father Abraham calls him "Son" in return. Therefore this person died in an imperfect state of grace.
Quote:
Lastly, the pope himself declared that rich man went to hell.
See Spe Salve above.
Quote:
I don’t believe that 1 Peter 3:19 is speaking about purgatory. Those that Christ preached to in the prison mentioned in that text were not human.
You should have taken the time to read one more verse:
19 In which also coming he preached to those spirits that were in prison: 20 Which had been some time incredulous, when they waited for the patience of God in the days of Noe, when the ark was a building: wherein a few, that is, eight souls, were saved by water.
Quote:
The word translated “spirit” in that text refers to non human spirit beings unless modified in some way.
The fact is that the word "spirit" is frequently interchanged with the word "soul" in the Bible.
Quote:
(See also Matthew 12:45; Acts 23:8,9; Luke 10:20; Ephesians 2:2; Hebrews 1:14.)
Better idea. Why don't you quote them and explain your interpretation. Then I can see more easily what you are thinking. Otherwise you force me to make assumptions and that iis not helpful to a good discussion.
Quote:
As far as I’ve been able to determine, the church teaches that humans end up in purgatory, not non human spirit beings. If Christ had gone to purgatory, what would be his purpose?
To preach to His children who will soon be joining Him in Heaven.
Quote:
The use of 1 Corinthians 3:15 is popular among Catholics to support the notion of purgatory, but read carefully and in context, I don’t believe that it does so. For instance, if Paul is speaking about purgatory in that text, what is the reward mentioned in v.14 of the 3rd chapter of 1 Corinthians?
The reward is always heaven.
Sincerely,
De Maria