Wrong on both counts.Quote:
Originally Posted by michealb
1. The eyewitness testimony of these creatures has not been proven beyond doubt. The claims are shadowy and the statements sketchy. The quality of the testimony is nowhere near the quality of the testimony in support of Jesus' existence.
2. And although the testimony for these creatures is not of great quality, that still does not disprove their existence.
Also, you are again creating straw men, I didn't say that these creatures existed.
You are here, make the arguments yourself. I could also post all kinds of articles for you to read to refute everything you say. But I'm polite enough to produce my arguments here.Quote:
You missed major points in the article that explained why those eye witness accounts aren't good ones.
Unless of course you don't really have any arguments.
Not when you have multiple credible eyewitnesses of good moral character. And in regards to the Gospels, there is a great deal of evidence to support their testimonies besides their testimonies.Quote:
Eye witness accounts have to have other evidence in support of them or they are bunk.
Sincerely,
De Maria
