So the question still remains The House of Judah being the Judism/Jewish tribe which Christ refer as Jews were known as the brothers to the other 10 tribes, but did not follow the same God.
In fact the Jews mocked Christ with the sign over His head on the cross saying King of the Jews, and placed the crown of thorns upon His head to mock His words that proclaimed Him, King of Israel and The Son of God..
Israelites were indeed Hebrews under command of David, and the lordship of Levites..

It remains my question as to why some say Christ was Jewish? or a Jew?

Matthew 1 and Luke 3 both give the genealogy of Jesus as the son of Judah, son of Jacob, son of Isaac. So he was of the tribe of Judah. The complicated Jewish law forbid any of the 12 tribes to intermarry, they needed to marry only a kinsman of the same tribe. Only Benjamin and Judah worshipped in King David's city along with the Levites, the other tribes worshipped elsewhere and had their own King.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wildandblue

Matthew 1 and Luke 3 both give the geneology of Jesus as the son of Judah, son of Jacob, son of Isaac. So he was of the tribe of Judah. The complicated Jewish law forbid any of the 12 tribes to intermarry, they needed to marry only a kinsman of the same tribe. Only Benjamin and Judah worshipped in King David's city along with the Levites, the other tribes worshipped elsewhere and had their own King.

---

No I find the scripture directly tell us Jesus generations was of The House Of David. He was born in Bethlehem which was in Judaea, but that does not offer his hertiage to the throne which was of The House of David.

Matthew 1:17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.

Luke 1:27 To a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name was Mary

________________________________________________

Perhaps you thinking -- Jacob sons of Racheal 1. Joseph 2. Benjamin.- Genesis 46:19... Joesph son of Jacob set as head of the House, sold original by his brothers, came to live in Egypt- Genesis 46:6... and Joseph followed in his father's Jacob's foot steps as a servant to God.- Genesis 50:25...
Joseph sons 1. Manasseth 2. Ephraism - Genesis 46:20
______________________________________________

Both accounts tell of Isaac, Jacob aka Israel, and his son Judah. Names like Joseph and Saul and were common to all families. The splitting of the Israelites into two kingdoms is covered at 1Kings 12. There was a northern and a southern kingdom, each with its own king

The thread, the thread, the thread.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Galveston1

The thread, the thread, the thread.

---

1. account of nation

John 18:35 Pilate answered, Am I a Jew? Thine own nation and the chief priests have delivered thee unto me: what hast thou done?

2. Jesus himself

John 18:36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

3. Hear truth

John 18:37 Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice.

This world is made up of nations, and scripture offers the Jewish, and Gentile. Both of this world..

Do you disagree with this?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wildandblue

both accounts tell of Isaac, Jacob aka Israel, and his son Judah. Names like Joseph and Saul and were common to all families. The splitting of the Israelites into two kingdoms is covered at 1Kings 12. There was a northern and a southern kingdom, each with its own king

---

After much study concerning the tribes, I can offer a 12 tribe refer breakdown.

A. Jacob sons of Racheal 1. Joseph 2. Benjamin.- Genesis 46:19...

B. Jacob sons of Rachael's maid servant Bilhah 1. Dan 2. Naphtali -Genesis 46:23-25

C. Jacob sons of Leah 1. Rueban 2. Simeon 3. Levi 4. Judah 5. Issachar 6. Zebulun - Genesis 49:3 49:5 49:8 49:13 49:14

D. Jacob sons of Leah's maid servant Zipah 1. Gad 2. Asher - Genesis 46:23-24

12 Tribes of Israel -Genesis 49:28 Sons of Jacob

The House of David comes out of Jacob from wife Leah to one of six sons born, to their fourth son Judah. 2 Sa 2:10 Ishbosheth Saul's son was forty years old when he began to reign over Israel, and reigned two years. But the house of Judah followed David.

The House of Levite known to Moses and Aaron was from Jacob and Leah's third son Levi. The Virgin Mary was a daughter of Aaron.

Known on earth by nation

Romans 2:27 And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law?

Not Jew

Romans 2:28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither [is that] circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:

Is a Jew

Romans 2:29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision [is that] of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise [is] not of men, but of God.

Another Nation

Acts 10:28 And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean.

The thread, sndbay.
We are talking about Pentecostals and Mary here, not Jesus.

[It has been explained to me that one gospel gives Mary's bloodline, the other traces Joseph's which if you look at them start the same but branch off at about the time of Solomon and Rehoboam.
Of course since Joseph was his adopted father and God was his actual father his human bloodline isn't all that important, right?
Nehemiah and Ezra also gives an account of how the original temple was rebuilt by the tribes of Benjamin and Judah and presided over by the Levites. The Levites had no share in Israel they inherited the Temple service. The ten other tribes were the eight tribes descended from Jacob plus Manasseh and Ephraim which together came out of Joseph. The other ten lived in Samaria.]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wildandblue

The thread, sndbay.
We are talking about Pentecostals and Mary here, not Jesus.

---

So I am, and I find scripture helps define the question as well as giving the answer. So many posting jump to conclusion without the facts.

Mary holds to a nation of Truth, unto the Kingdom of God.
My point is Jews are a nation who hold to Jewish faith. Jesus said to come unto Him of such is the Kingdom of God. So Chirst holds to a nation being of the Kingdom of God. Futher more Christ tells us that His nation of people are those who hear Truth.
Even when Jesus answered Pilate, John 18:36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence. John 18:37 Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the Truth. Every one that is of the Truth heareth my voice.

To say Jesus or Mary are Jews is not Truth. Mary was Hebrew, she was Levite and an Israelite. In American we are a nation of Christians under one God. But what do you find within this nation of Christians? Do all people follow the Christian faith?
As to whether Mary was Penecoastal is to also believe that the Penecoastal faith is built upon, and holds to the nation which is the Kingdom of God. And Pentecostalism is a religious movement within Christianity that places special emphasis on the direct personal experience of God through the Baptism of the Holy Spirit, as shown in the Biblical account of the Day of Pentecost.

This still remains under a nation of Christianity in faith and a man fundamentalist religious movement.

In choice of the mind, heart and soul, Mary was a child of God who heard and followed God, not man. So she was neither Jew or Penecoastal becuase she did not follow man.

Galveston 1,

As the Pentecostal movement is so important in the USA, and fast growing in the rest of world, I will try my best to answer the question posed by
As you know, the basis of Pentecostalism is Jesus Christ, with high emphasis in the explosive power of the Holy Spirit, specially as experienced by the disciples of Christ in the Great Pentecost of Acts 2,1, with the baptism with the Holy Spirit of Act.2:4 and speaking in tongues…
This is something we Catholics also believe in.
The "two main features" of the Pentecostals are "praising the Lord" and "service", which is also accepted by Roman Catholics.
Then, the Pentecostals assert the Virgin Mary is the first Pentecostal of the NT as shown in Mat.1 and Lk. 1:
They explain that by adding that:
Of the 7 Episodes of Pentecost in the NT, the first one was in Luk.1, when the Holy Spirit came to Virgin Mary, and filled her with Jesus, which is the essence of any Pentecost... and filled with Jesus, Virgin Mary did the two things every good Pentecostal should do:
1- She went to serve her cousin Elizabeth, when she was pregnant at old age (Luk.1:39-45).
2- She praised the glories of God wit the "Magnificat" of Luk.1:46-56.
- The "second Pentecost", occurred when Elizabeth and John the Baptist received the Holy Spirit at the Virgin Marys visit (Luk.1:41).
- The "third Pentecost", the big one, was in Act.2, when the Holy Spirit came over the disciples with Virgin Mary present, and the Church was officially born to the world. This is, of course, a point of view which, in my opinion, does not affect the Basics of Christiany beliefs.
On the other hand, the Parusia or the "Second Coming of Christ", is a preferred theme for the Pentecostals, as well as for the Baptists, Evangelicals... and also for many Catholics. Do not wait until the Second Coming to be saved, "now is the acceptable time, now is the time of salvation" (2Cor.6:2), in the Second Coming, Jesus will not come "to save", but "to judge", the good ones to Heaven, and the bad ones to Hell (Matt.25:31-46, Jn.5:29, Rom.2:5-10, 2Cor.5:10, 1Thes.4:15-18, Rev.20:11-15).
There are, of course, other aspects of this movement, where Catholics and many Protestant denominations do not agree of coincide with. But this is the problem Christianity is coping with since practically the very beginning. Differences of opinion, which is funny bearing in mind we all believe in the same GOD.
But these differences aside, and looking at what I said before I guess there is no basic problem in accepting the Virgin Mary was a Pentecostal.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gromitt82

Galveston 1,

As the Pentecostal movement is so important in the USA, and fast growing in the rest of world, I will try my best to answer the question posed by

---

What would be important for this world is for all to ask first what is the Will of God. You have labeled Mary Penecoastal, a judgement far closer to man's values then to Our Father's..

[Galveston1 agrees: This is a good answer. Do most Catholics agree? [/QUOTE]

There are an estimated number of over a billion Catholics in the World. How can you expect me to answer your question, when here, in this Board, where we may just few a few scores, we do not get to agree on some irrelevant (in my opinion, of course) fact such as whether the Virgin Mary, the mother of Jesus, was a Pentecostal?

What I wrote is strictly my own opinion, and as I often say, I may be completely wrong. Still, I can imagine that not all Catholics may agree with me. There are some Catholics, who are quite fundamentalist too, and they are still living in the times previous to the Ecumenic Council II.

For instance, there are many who would love to celebrate the Mass in Latin, as it was done before, and with the priest facing the Altar, not the attendants...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sndbay

So the question still remains The House of Judah being the Judism/Jewish tribe which Christ refer as Jews were known as the brothers to the other 10 tribes, but did not follow the same God.
In fact the Jews mocked Christ with the sign over His head on the cross saying King of the Jews, and placed the crown of thorns upon His head to mock His words that proclaimed Him, King of Israel and The Son of God..
Israelites were indeed Hebrews under command of David, and the lordship of Levites..

It remains my question as to why some say Christ was Jewish? or a Jew?

---

Snd,

I don't understand. He practiced the Jewish faith and HE was a Jew. (I remember once you said moses wasn't a Jew.) Are you suggesting that Jesus is not a JEW?

Jhn 8:22 Then said the Jews, Will he kill himself? Because he saith, Whither I go, ye cannot come...
Jhn 8:39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

Was not jesus' father abraham also?

Jesus practiced the Jewish faith, he taught and worshiped in the temple. In fact he called the temple his Fathers house, when he threw out the money changers.

Using the current meaning of "Pentacostal", she would be called Neo-Pentacostal or Charismatic.(non-denominational)

She knew that God was still active in the affairs of man and so could accept the words of an angel which were in accordance with the Scripture and could accept that God's plan for her would be accomplished through her.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by revdrgade

Using the current meaning of "Pentacostal", she would be called Neo-Pentacostal or Charismatic.(non-denominational)

She knew that God was still active in the affairs of man and so could accept the words of an angel which were in accordance with the Scripture and could accept that God's plan for her would be accomplished through her.

---

I agree mostly. Certainly there was no such thing as a Cristian "denomination" when the Holy Ghost fell on those believers on that day of Pentecost. Believers were not even called "Christians" until later.

Frankly, I do not consider the name "Pentecostal" to mean a member of any denomination, even though there are several that incorporate it into their official names. Since many in those denominations have never been filled with the Holy Spirit, those members are not "Pentecostal" in fact.

I think Mary could not care less on how we label her . She could very well answear us like this '' All I know is that I gave birth to Jesus Christ , I am His mother!''
Here's one more question? Was Peter or Paul or any of Jesus' apostles Pentecostal?
And one more... Were they Catholics?
And one more... Were they Orthodox?
And one more... Were they anything else than Christians ( Christ's followers and believers)?
Were they baptized by the Holly Spirit?Yes they were ! Does this make them Pentecostals?Certainly not!
The question is not if those people were like Pentecostals or Catholics or Orthodox or anything else that we call ourselves but the question should be if we all are like them?
We call those people our fathers in faith, so we should be like them and not the other way.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by adam7gur

I think Mary could not care less on how we label her . She could very well answear us like this '' All I know is that I gave birth to Jesus Christ , I am His mother!''
Here's one more question? Was Peter or Paul or any of Jesus' apostles Pentecostal?
And one more... Were they Catholics?
And one more...Were they Orthodox?
And one more... Were they anything else than Christians ( Christ's followers and believers)?
Were they baptized by the Holly Spirit?Yes they were ! Does this make them Pentecostals?Certainly not!
The question is not if those people were like Pentecostals or Catholics or Orthodox or anything else that we call ourselves but the question should be if we all are like them?
We call those people our fathers in faith, so we should be like them and not the other way.

---

I think you have hit the only point that really matters in this post that has been dragging for so long.

Are we like them, irrespective of how we wish to call them? The answer, of course, is that we are certainly NOT. Unfortunately, there is plenty of room to improve on our side and though we are well aware as to how to do it, we seem to be unable to follow their example!