De Maria.
I agree!
Fred
![]() |
De Maria.
I agree!
Fred
[QUOTE=De Maria;1415559]For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened,
We are enlightened by receiving the Holy Spirit, are we not?
Yeah so HOW do we receive and BECOME partakers of the Holy Spirit if we already had the Holy Spirit when we were unsaved?
JoeT,
I have yet to see Tj3 respond to the post by De Maria where she posts quotes by the early Church Fathers.
For some reason I thing I never will for he either can not or won't.
Fred
Scripture doesn't say they were saved. You do.
Where does it say that Spirit departed them?Quote:
but what about after they turned away from Christ - where does it say that the Holy Spirit continued to indwell?
As for me, I would rather believe that the Spirit did depart them when they turned away. But that Scripture doesn't say so. If you can find one that does say so, please post it.
But it won't help your argument. Because this Scripture never calls them who fell away after they received the Holy Spirit, saved. And since, in the end, they were not saved, that means that the unsaved were indwelled by the Holy Spirit.
Sincerely,
De Maria
I'm not making any sense? I thought you were using this scripture to prove that unbelievers have the Holy Spirit before they are saved. I am not following the point of why you used this if that was not why.
Where do you get they were never saved? How could they have never been saved when it says they were and fell away?
And we're discussing opinions about what Scripture says. Are you really uninterested in what the Apostles students have to say? They have nothing to teach us? You've made mention in past of biblical scholars, you talk about the history (which I'm guessing you get from books other than the Bible)--and yet you see no value whatever in how others have understood Scripture? You have nothing to learn from anyone? If your answer to that is No, then why wouldn't you avail yourself of the resources provided by the early Fathers (many of whom were martyred)?
You might as well get some sleep. I think we’ll be waiting till the 2nd, or maybe the 3rd or 4th coming of Christ before we get an answer (this is an inside joke folks).
Strange isn’t it, we answer his questions but Tj doesn’t seem to return the curtsy with a reasoned response.
Goodnight Fred.
Tj3,
So you chose to ignore what the early Church Fathers said about Jesus, Scrioture and the Church.
That shouts loudly about yourself protection so you can continue to make the FALSE claim that the Catholic Church started in 325 AD.
Whether you like it of not it IS the holy Church founded by Jesus Christ and anything other than that you may say of believe IS an intentional error on your part.
Good night Joe.
Sleep well.
You have done well.
Fred
I don't "ignore". But when I want to know what sound doctrine is, I go to the source.
The historical truth really gets under your skin, doesn't it Fred?Quote:
That shouts loudly about yourself protection so you can continue to make the FALSE claim that the Catholic Church started in 325 AD.
Akoue,
Points well made.
Tom Smith (Tj3) proves again that he has a closed mind which is made up full of bogus Church history.
Fred
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:34 PM. |