tomder55
Aug 21, 2023, 05:01 AM
I've seen this claim enough times that it is now in the urban legend status.
This is the most recent version
The Constitution Prohibits Trump From Ever Being President Again (msn.com) (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/the-constitution-prohibits-trump-from-ever-being-president-again/ar-AA1fu49R)
and it is not just partisan journals like 'Atlantic' ; so called constitutional scholars are parroting it too.
The Sweep and Force of Section Three by William Baude, Michael Stokes Paulsen :: SSRN (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4532751)
Basically the claim is that sec 3 of the 14th amendment bars those who previously took federal oaths from assuming office if they engaged in insurrection or rebellion.
Add this to garbage like the moon landing was faked and Elvis was sighted at the 7-11.
The Dems love this fiction because it not only nails Trump ;but also any other Repub they want eliminated .
Dems try to cancel their ballot opponents . (askmehelpdesk.com) (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/current-events/dems-try-cancel-their-ballot-opponents-848894.html)
This is their insurance policy if 4 cases that have over 100 charges doesn't get it done.
The 14th amendment was about an ACTUAL REBELLION. So all their arguments are based on the faulty premise that Jan 6 was a rebellion. Of the 100+ charges against Trump ,none of them come close to claiming rebellion. Jack Smith was given the responsibility to investigate Jan 6 . He did not make a single insurrection or rebellion charge against Trump . Not one charge of insurrection or rebellion has been made against any of the Jan 6 rioters either.
Trump showed very poor judgment and leadership on Jan 6 . He was not part of an insurrection ;nor were the rioters. They got carried away and took advantage of some very lame security precautions to riot inside the Capitol . Trump sulked in the Oval office instead of calling on his supporters to break it off. That lack of leadership disqualifies him from my support ;but not from the office.
Is stopping a Congressional process a 14th amendment disqualifier ? Then anyone who challenged Trump's certification in 2016 were guilty.
Rep. Raskin Challenges Awarding of Electors - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxEr_mRpp44)
This is the most recent version
The Constitution Prohibits Trump From Ever Being President Again (msn.com) (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/the-constitution-prohibits-trump-from-ever-being-president-again/ar-AA1fu49R)
and it is not just partisan journals like 'Atlantic' ; so called constitutional scholars are parroting it too.
The Sweep and Force of Section Three by William Baude, Michael Stokes Paulsen :: SSRN (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4532751)
Basically the claim is that sec 3 of the 14th amendment bars those who previously took federal oaths from assuming office if they engaged in insurrection or rebellion.
Add this to garbage like the moon landing was faked and Elvis was sighted at the 7-11.
The Dems love this fiction because it not only nails Trump ;but also any other Repub they want eliminated .
Dems try to cancel their ballot opponents . (askmehelpdesk.com) (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/current-events/dems-try-cancel-their-ballot-opponents-848894.html)
This is their insurance policy if 4 cases that have over 100 charges doesn't get it done.
The 14th amendment was about an ACTUAL REBELLION. So all their arguments are based on the faulty premise that Jan 6 was a rebellion. Of the 100+ charges against Trump ,none of them come close to claiming rebellion. Jack Smith was given the responsibility to investigate Jan 6 . He did not make a single insurrection or rebellion charge against Trump . Not one charge of insurrection or rebellion has been made against any of the Jan 6 rioters either.
Trump showed very poor judgment and leadership on Jan 6 . He was not part of an insurrection ;nor were the rioters. They got carried away and took advantage of some very lame security precautions to riot inside the Capitol . Trump sulked in the Oval office instead of calling on his supporters to break it off. That lack of leadership disqualifies him from my support ;but not from the office.
Is stopping a Congressional process a 14th amendment disqualifier ? Then anyone who challenged Trump's certification in 2016 were guilty.
Rep. Raskin Challenges Awarding of Electors - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxEr_mRpp44)