Quote:

---

Originally Posted by linnealand

that said, i know i'm a natural blond, but i did realize the silly nature of the question.

for the record, linny doesn't think that the body is like cotton stuffed teddy bear in which one might reach in and stuff the feet through the eye holes.

i just don't want you (or anyone else) thinking that i'm sitting at home, staring at the wall and really wondering why it wouldn't be a great idea to do a boob job through a bum hole. or a nose for that matter.

---

I know... I'm just an amateur med geek and you gave me an opening to play doctor. Like I can walk away from that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kp2171

i know... im just an amateur med geek and you gave me an opening to play doctor. like i can walk away from that.

---

Yum, my bad. :) looks like someone got our lines crossed.

*quick, alty, help me tie them around his wrists!*

There we go. That's better.

So you want to play doctor, hmm?

What's this part called? Where does it connect to the funny bone? Why are some people blond? Why is the sky blue? Linny says she knows about the nose and starfish thing. She has also played Operation on several occasions and almost won twice, so she knows what she is talking about. I see only one important question left.

What's one man to do with a real pair of F's? I mean alty's. Forgive me, my highly adored and respected friend, I'm pimping you out again. My pair of F's lives in my imagination. Yes, they live there. In a pumpkin. Someone woke up giddy this morning. It must be you. *wink!

Are these tatas real?

http://www.allmoviesblog.com/wp-cont...y_lee_full.jpg

I found a truly scientific chart called "The Ratio of Pamela's Breasts over Pamela's Head vs. Time"
http://www.superpam.com/

http://www.pamelachannel.com/channel/odette-sugerman/

As a graphic artist I would say the boobs are real but have been enhanced graphically. More photsohop than nature.

Personally they are fake to me, but it depends on what a person likes in set of breasts.

The skin looks real, the nipples look real, would the handling of such a set seem real (I don't know, I've never handled such a set)?

For some guys, if the skin is real, the nipples are real, and the handling is acceptable to their preferences then they are real. For some guys it doesn't matter what is inside because they would prefer a woman to have breasts that stimulate them visually and since they had little or no interest what was inside originally any change that they can't see is a non-issue.

So to some, are they real, yes; but they have been structurally enhanced... and to those people they either don't care about the structural enhancement or prefer the enhancement ;)

-----------------------

Oh and for boobs to be that firm naturally she would have to be 14 or 15 years old and a freak of nature in the boob department... she doesn't look 14 or 15.

I believe Pamela admitted in the past that her boobs was fake. She is a real honest person and her boobs have been discuss many times.

Here is a linked about her talking about her boobs:
http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famec...er-scenes.aspx - 48k - Cached -

Yes, pamela has been very open about her enhancements, both talking about her surgeries and displaying them for some coin.

I have a great, great friend who is curvey and busty. I've known her since before HS days. She has structure and form that lead many to accuse her of having enhancement. I've even seen her topless... no, we've never dated or anything like that. Just good, old friends... (btw, she's shown me her arse too, more than once, when mooning me out of her displeasure. Funny how that was to "punish" me) so if she gets a new nipple ring she might say "want to take a look?"... I'm a boy... hell yes! She's tanned topless in my back yard. I know it sounds weird. It is what it is. She just doesn't think it's a big deal. Also, she's worked in theatre for forever, and you just have to get over being naked in front of people to do costume changes. Some people are more voyeuristic and comfortable in their own skin.

My point... what the hells my point?. boob distraction... uhm... I think people are sometimes too quick to judge.

This girl was teased and tormented when younger for having a bigger chest. In college girls accused her of having implants. Please! Are you kidding me? She was working her arse off just to buy food week to week.

I GUARANTEE you... if you saw her naked, you'd say "fake"... she just has more structure than you expect and perfectly round DD's... what's the phrase for bad implants? Boobs on a board? She's almost that, but I KNOW she's had no surgery. I've been around her since she was 12.

There are some people who have form and structure that is genetic, "God given", whatever.

I saw sophia loren on the dave letterman show last year. She looked fantastic! And not like she's had so many surgeries that her eyebrows are at her hairline... she looks naturally beautiful... and voluptuous to boot.

I'm not one to deny what a good bra can do to any woman. For a woman who is smaller, a little padding and proper support can do wonders. For a bigger woman, the right support can "firm" and shape.

Mkay... I'm losing myself here, so I should quit.

Yes, pam (she lets me call her pam) has had implants... emphasis on the plural.

But don't always assume a girl with high structure on the chest has had surgery. Push up bras can make a bigger woman with firm structure look fake.

Don't get me wrong... I'm not a fan of "boobs on a board" and there are some really bad jobs out there... but the woman I dated with a good job... it was just as pleasing to the touch as the girl I dated in HS with the naturally big chest.

I still don't know what my point was other than to talk about boobs.

Welcome to Boob Talk.

Hmmm, with all this boob talk I might go and get a boob job. I won't even tell my fiancé just come home with it like I got a new hairstyle or something. I wonder what would he say? I know what he would do but I guess actions speak louder than words. Hmmm!

So is one to assume, kp, that you prefer nicely done implanted women to naturally flat-chested women? Interesting attitude... At least you're honest though... I feel like a lot of guys who claim they don't like implants aren't being honest with themselves/imagine implants feeling like Barbie's boobies or something... considering they all seem to like the famous models, which all intelligent people KNOW are often fake.

Uhm... I NEVER said that.

Yes. I like curves. And the idea of "natural" is quite nice. But I've dated a sexy woman who just RULED me, and she was an A cup. A bad boob job isn't sexy. I've only dated one woman who had one (implants), and hers was all but undetectable.

Personally, I like proportion more than anything. One italian girl I dated was a bit "wider"... not necessarily fat, but not skinny by any means. Her form was nice and pleasing. And really, it was her eyes and lips that slayed me. Curves up top might catch my eye, but there are so many areas of a woman's body that is just amazing... so I didn't mean to sound like I prefer bigger versus smaller.

The petite nursing student with A's was just lovely as she was.

And the HS sweetheart with big C/D's was fine too.

Don't assume from my rantings that I'm am all breast man, and that bigger is better.

My diatribe was more about how assuming a "bigger" girl with a thin waist is all surgery... sometimes that's true, and sometimes not.

From a women's perspective I can see the desire to get implants. Not for me though, I already have 32F's I don't want or need them any bigger than that. At this point I'm thinking of a reduction, maybe then gravity will slow down a bit. ;)

I think that where men are concerned, it's a bad boob job that's a turn off. If you can't tell when you touch them, then I think most men would say they're okay.

Am I right boys, or totally off the mark?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Altenweg

From a womens perspective I can see the desire to get implants. Not for me though, I already have 32F's I don't want or need them any bigger than that. At this point I'm thinking of a reduction, maybe then gravity will slow down a bit. ;)

I think that where men are concerned, it's a bad boob job that's a turn off. If you can't tell when you touch them, then I think most men would say they're okay.

Am I right boys, or totally off the mark?

---

I'm not a boob guy personally and you know the saying "tits are for kids"... lol. However, I do like the look of boobs in clothing, I like the lines and curves they create for a woman; I prefer boobs that are in preportion to the woman's body again from a covered perspective. As for naked boobs, all shapes and sizes have their plus's, it doesn't matter much to me from a visual perspective but I would not like boobs that are hard; fake hard as opposed to the firm I knew when I was a teenager as were teenaged boobs I touched.

As for bad boob job, any boob job that is on a woman that is very thin and the boobs pop off the chest like they were super glued on is a bad boob job no matter how good they may look; because to me they don't look like they match the body.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Altenweg

I think that where men are concerned, it's a bad boob job that's a turn off. If you can't tell when you touch them, then I think most men would say they're okay.

Am I right boys, or totally off the mark?

---

I think your spot on Alty , especially as far as I'm concerned.

I also agree with KP were as it's not the size that counts.

See that's just it though TP. I'm not a large women, not ultra thin, but not overweight, yet I still have size F boobs, 32F to boot so I do get comments like "are those real?" Why would ayone pay to have F's, they're a pain in the back, a pain to buy clothing for, just a regular pain.

My boobs don't really match my body, but they are mine, they are natural. Thank goodness I'm tall otherwise I'd really look funny. ;)

Personally, one of my favorite view of a woman's chest is from behind. I love looking at the lines of her back, and seeing a little side boob from behind. Just love that curve.

Maybe its because I like a little mystery. Full frontal is fine, but I'm a but of a voyeur... tease me some and I'm putty.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Altenweg

See that's just it though TP. I'm not a large women, not ultra thin, but not overweight, yet I still have size F boobs, 32F to boot so I do get comments like "are those real?" Why would ayone pay to have F's, they're a pain in the back, a pain to buy clothing for, just a regular pain.

My boobs don't really match my body, but they are mine, they are natural. Thank goodness I'm tall otherwise I'd really look funny. ;)

---

Tall with discernable boobs is a good thing, often a tall woman lacks some of the curves that a shorter woman has and having an ample rack "as they say" must make you quite the alluring sight.

I love tall women... shame I am a shorter man, the two have matched up only on occasion in my life... lol.

TP... what does your avatar shirt say? Curious.

The only problem I've had with taller women is if their femurs are really long, well... its hard sometimes to "match up"... I'm not short, but not tall... married to a shorter, but long legged woman.

I've dated tall guys, short guys, fat guys, skinny guys, it's about what's in their heart, not what they look like. At least for me. :)

Hubby is 6'1" I'm 5'11".

My shortest boyfriend was 5'4".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kp2171

TP... what does your avatar shirt say? curious.

---

It says


Geezer
_______
Dingbat

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kp2171

TP... what does your avatar shirt say? curious.

the only problem ive had with taller women is if their femurs are really long, well... its hard sometimes to "match up"... im not short, but not tall... married to a shorter, but long legged woman.

---

Ya, I've had that problem KP, a lot! :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kp2171

TP... what does your avatar shirt say? curious.

the only problem ive had with taller women is if their femurs are really long, well... its hard sometimes to "match up"... im not short, but not tall... married to a shorter, but long legged woman.

---

The T-Shirt needs to be taken down in light of the election season is over, but it says:

GEEZER
--------------
DINGBAT

Comments on this post
Altenweg agrees: So you are a boob man M. ;)

Uuhhmmmm yes , amongst other things ;)

So M, and all the other men, what's your "thing" are you a boob man, arse man, leg man, personality, looks, what?

Inquiring minds want to know. :)

Be honest!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by altenweg

so m, and all the other men, what's your "thing" are you a boob man, arse man, leg man, personality, looks?

Be honest!

---

Yes!!

Oh my, all of them M? Wow! :)

Well first and foremost is the woman's personality, my wife is the most beautiful woman I know and it comes from the inside; that is what attracted me to her. I've dated lots of women that were very physically attractive, but they didn't have an inner beauty that spoke to me; perhaps someone else, but not to me.

Now having said that and being that this thread is about boobs and the physical, I would consider myself a "Treasure" guy.

The "Treasure" of course (not to be crude) is a woman's genitalia. How can that be since it's not visible? Well it works like this for me.

If I see a woman with nice hips, butt, and long legs in pair of jeans cut just the right way it drives me crazy and my mind thinks about her "Treasure". Or if I see a woman in a skirt or a dress I can't help thinking about the "Treasure" that awaits under her skirt.

I might be in the minority amongst men here and you might think of me as vulgar, but you asked for honesty.

This might sound superficial, but to me I love the packaging of the "Treasure"; not so much the "Treasure" itself, but what the packaging does to draw my attention to this fantasy notion of the "Treasure" beyond my sight or grasp. The mystery is big part of it, because I find a woman much more sexy in clothing that accentuates her hips, legs, etc. than her completely naked; which takes all the mystery out of it.

Of course what arouses my curiosity to begin with is something about the persons face, whether that be the eyes, smile, kindness, youthfulness, confidence, or her personality. Once she has captured my attention through her face or some other aspect then I review the packaging of the "Treasure"... ;)

Oh... and long legs are one of the best packaging attributes... :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Altenweg

Oh my, all of them M? Wow! :)

---

LOL... does that make me greedy Alty ;)

Hmm... I wonder how many guys who call themselves "legs" men or "hips" men are really that way for the kind of reason you mention.

I know when I was in high school, I used to argue to male friends that all the obsession with boobs and relative lack of interest in legs and hips didn't make sense to me, just from a practical standpoint... I guess for some men as they get older their tastes change though. (as a lady who does much better by societal ideals in the letter area than the former, I am a bit biased myself of course... )

M, greedy, no, delusional, maybe. ;) Kidding. There are women who have it all. :)

I am a women, and even though you boys didn't ask, I'll tell you what turns me on the most about a guy.

There are many things, but looks and a big "package" don't enter the picture. Sure, it's nice if he has it all, but those two are at the bottom of my list.

I like a guy that can make me laugh, think, cry, a man that makes baby noises at a dog. I like a guy that can open a jar of jam but isn't defensive when I do it. I like a guy who believes that women can do anything a man can. I like a guy that accepts me for who and what I am and doesn't dredge up the past that I can't change. In other words, I like my hubby. ;)

I have to say that your "fetish" isn't as abnormal as you think TP. A lot of guys like a bit of mystery and prefer to imagine what's under the clothes then seeing a girl naked.

I feel the same way about a guy in a nice pair of jeans. Yummy! :)

Well I didn't mean they were all essential Alty , just that I liked all of them ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Toluca_00

Hmm... I wonder how many guys who call themselves "legs" men or "hips" men are really that way for the kind of reason you mention.

I know when I was in high school, I used to argue to male friends that all the obsession with boobs and relative lack of interest in legs and hips didn't make sense to me, just from a practical standpoint... I guess for some men as they get older their tastes change though. (as a lady who does much better by societal ideals in the letter area than the former, I am a bit biased myself of course...)

---

I've always been a "Treasure" guy, but when I was in my early teens there was more of an interest in boobs, largely I think because they were relatively new on the girls; but as I said on a previous page in this thread "tits are for kids"... :) Now that is not to besmurch other men who have a primary interest in them, as I've matured over the years I know that my erotic triggers have expanded and/or changed from time to time and if "boobs" are the be all and end all for other guys, I can certainly understand it.

Well then M, if you could only have a few, which would be the most important?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TexasParent

I've always been a "Treasure" guy, but when I was in my early teens there was more of an interest in boobs, largely I think because they were relatively new on the girls; but as I said on a previous page in this thread "tits are for kids"... :) Now that is not to besmurch other men who have a primary interest in them, as I've matured over the years I know that my erotic triggers have expanded and/or changed from time to time and if "boobs" are the be all and end all for other guys, I can certainly understand it.

---

Personally I've never understood the obsession some men have for boobs. Maybe it's because I own a pair. ;)

But really, lets think about this logically, and totally gross out the "boob" guys.

Boobs have a purpose, they are for feeding an infant. In fact, my hubby, who loves the boobs, was really turned off by them when I was brestfeeding the kids. It got to the point where he asked me to wear a bra during sex. I thought it was hilarious, after all, that is what boobs are for.

Really though, they're just bumps with nipples. Why the fascination?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Altenweg

Well then M, if you could only have a few, which would be the most important?

---

Ok I suppose the first thing that strikes me when a woman walks in the room is her face , if she has a pretty face she has my attention.

Nice legs are an eyecatcher for me too. But ultimately a good personality obviously is a must.

(AND WORLD PEACE):rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Altenweg

Personally I've never understood the obsession some men have for boobs. Maybe it's because I own a pair. ;)

But really, lets think about this logically, and totally gross out the "boob" guys.

Boobs have a purpose, they are for feeding an infant. In fact, my hubby, who loves the boobs, was really turned off by them when I was brestfeeding the kids. It got to the point where he asked me to wear a bra during sex. I thought it was hilarious, after all, that is what boobs are for.

Really though, they're just bumps with nipples. Why the fascination?

---

I think that some men need "boobs" to play with because their idea of what turns a woman on is based on their own self view of physical stimulation (i.e. their penis). They need something tangible, outside the body (as it were) to focus their attention on; to please a woman. I remember having this conflict with myself when I was a very young teen, but decided ( I was exposed to female genitailia at a young age ) that what I couldn't see as much had much more potential for pleasing her and pleasing me. So I understand that some men love to play with boobs thinking it is the be all and end all in pleasing a woman, and for some women they love having their boobs played with; it helps define them sexually and some report being able to orgasm from having them played with.

So I get it what "boobs" do for some men and why they are so fascinated with the female version of the penis (as it were). Now is that the only reason some guys are "boob" men, I doubt it, but since I'm not a boob guy other than I love they way they look in clothing. I can't offer much more.

:)

Hmmm, interesting insight into men and the way they think. Thanks boys. :)

TexasParent,

But nipples are very sensitive in both men and women. They can be used to turn both men and women on.

But the size of the boobs has no impact on this. And the boobs are not analogous to the penis. So, I guess your explanation still doesn't really make sense to me.

I always figured it was just pop culture. Just because boobs are what you see everywhere, and what young boys learn to focus their attention on. Brothers talk about them, magazines feature sexily posed women with visual focus on breasts.

Altenweg,
Wow, to me that's sad. I do not think all men find breasts to be a turnoff when they are feeding infants.

Quote:

---

Altenweg,
Wow, to me that's sad. I do not think all men find breasts to be a turnoff when they are feeding infants.

---

No, not all men, and hubby is fine now that the kids are weaned (they better be weaned, they're 10 and 6! ;)) but he felt as if they weren't sexy anymore because they had a purpose all of a sudden.

I kind of get it. To see your favorite play thing being used as a source of nourishment for your own child is a bit strange.

As for the nipples and stimulus, I agree. I am one of those women that can get to orgasm by simple nipple stimulation. Heck, if my bra rubs me the wrong way it can end up being very good. Not a good thing while shopping in Walmart in December. ;)

Who sais boobs are not analogous to the penis?

cawjus, I realize that you're new, but in order to join this site you were required to read the rules and regulations and agree to follow them.

It is against the rules to give someone a disagree for an opinion. You can only disagree with factually incorrect information.

Please follow the rules in the future.

Thank you.