Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Adult Sexuality (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=370)
-   -   Non latex birth contol (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=262697)

  • Jan 6, 2009, 09:49 PM
    Synnen

    Ah, can't see it anymore on their profile when the last login was--just when the last post was.

    My apologies. Carry on, then.
  • Jan 6, 2009, 09:51 PM
    ISneezeFunny

    Well, in that case...

    ... ATTICA! ATTICA! ATTICA!!
  • Jan 6, 2009, 09:52 PM
    Starbucks21

    Lamb skin condom? They're expensive but yea...

    There are latex alternative condoms


    Link to one popular brand Trojancondoms.com - Products - Trojan Supra® Condoms
  • Jan 6, 2009, 10:18 PM
    TexasParent
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Starbucks21 View Post
    lamb skin condom? they're expensive but yea...

    There are latex alternative condoms


    Link to one popular brand Trojancondoms.com - Products - Trojan Supra® Condoms

    Do you get that at the local sausage maker? ;)
  • Jan 7, 2009, 06:30 AM
    smoothy

    Natual skin condoms offer ZERO std protection... a point to remember.
  • Jan 7, 2009, 10:51 AM
    Choux

    ? Question gone horribly wrong. :)
  • Jan 7, 2009, 10:53 AM
    Starbucks21
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by smoothy View Post
    Natual skin condoms offer ZERO std protection.....a point to remember.

    Yep but it's non-latex. The one I linked isn't lamb skin it's a substitute for latex
  • Jan 7, 2009, 12:03 PM
    smoothy
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Starbucks21 View Post
    Yep but it's non-latex. The one i linked isn't lamb skin it's a substitute for latex

    Latex alternatives are nessessarily natural skin.

    Polyethylene condoms will block STD's as well as Latex for those with latex allergies, but natural skin types don't. One should not assume that they are safe for one night stands (natural skin ones).
  • Jan 7, 2009, 01:17 PM
    ISneezeFunny

    I always wondered about those lamb skin condoms...

    ... don't lamb skin have pores?!
  • Jan 7, 2009, 01:55 PM
    TexasParent
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by ISneezeFunny View Post
    I always wondered about those lamb skin condoms...

    ... don't lamb skin have pores?!

    I appears they do... read on:

    Quote:

    Lambskin

    Condoms made from one of the oldest condom materials, labeled "lambskin" (made from lamb intestines) are still available. They have a greater ability to transmit body warmth and tactile sensation, when compared to synthetic condoms, and are less allergenic than latex. However, there is an increased risk of transmitting STDs compared to latex because of pores in the material, which are thought to be large enough to allow infectious agents to pass through, albeit blocking the passage of sperm.[86] Lambskin condoms are also significantly more expensive than other types.

    Source: Wikipedia
  • Jan 7, 2009, 05:24 PM
    Starbucks21
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by smoothy View Post
    Latex alternatives are nessessarily natural skin.

    Polyethylene condoms will block STD's as well as Latex for those with latex allergies, but natural skin types don't. One should not assume that they are safe for one night stands (natural skin ones).



    I linked the polyethylene ones.

    Polyethylene is a matériel also used in plastic grocery bags. (though the condom is much more effective than a plastic grocery bag and I recommend the condom more than the bag as a form of birth control.)
  • Jan 8, 2009, 06:00 AM
    tickle

    Actually, Red Cross found that many people are allergic to latex gloves (latex being the key world not 'gloves'). So as of Jan. lst we are only allowed to use the blue nitrite gloves. Could be the OP's g/f was allergic to latex, that's why he was asking. Its too bad people can't be specific in these posts and misunderstandings wouldn't arise. IMO if that was the case here.
  • Jan 8, 2009, 06:59 AM
    JudyKayTee
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Starbucks21 View Post
    I linked the polyethylene ones.

    Polyethylene is a materiel also used in plastic grocery bags. (though the condom is much more effective than a plastic grocery bag and I recommend the condom more than the bag as a form of birth control.)



    I don't know if it's a method of birth control but there are men I would only consider having sex with if they had a paper bag (or plastic, I suppose) over their head.

    Is this what you mean?:D
  • Jan 8, 2009, 07:32 AM
    Starbucks21
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by JudyKayTee View Post
    I don't know if it's a method of birth control but there are men I would only consider having sex with if they had a paper bag (or plastic, I suppose) over their head.

    Is this what you mean?:D

    LOL... not really but that works too

    I was talking about the substitute they used instead of latex
  • Jan 8, 2009, 08:04 AM
    J_9
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by JudyKayTee View Post
    I don't know if it's a method of birth control but there are men I would only consider having sex with if they had a paper bag (or plastic, I suppose) over their head.

    I had a friend some 25 years ago who used a rubber glove... she ended up pregnant. :p
  • Jan 8, 2009, 08:06 AM
    ISneezeFunny

    I got to ask... which um... "finger" was used?
  • Jan 8, 2009, 08:06 AM
    JudyKayTee
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by J_9 View Post
    I had a friend some 25 years ago who used a rubber glove.....she ended up pregnant. :p



    I have quite a few questions here, any one of which will get me banned for life, so I am just going to go to another thread and think this over.
  • Jan 8, 2009, 08:14 AM
    Starbucks21
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by J_9 View Post
    I had a friend some 25 years ago who used a rubber glove.....she ended up pregnant. :p

    Your poor bunny avatar...

    This is why I don't think non-fda approved birth control works

    Though I have heard a lot of condom misuse stories that hurt the bunny more...

    4 teens 1 condom

    1st couple put it on

    2nd couple then turned it inside out and used it again

    The second couple got pregnant by the first couple

    They need better health classes in Texas...

    But one very interesting day as a pharm tech
  • Jan 8, 2009, 08:16 AM
    J_9
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Starbucks21 View Post
    This is why I don't think non-fda approved birth control works

    Heck, FDA approved birth control is not 100% effective either. I can name many many people who followed directions to the T and still have children.
  • Jan 8, 2009, 08:22 AM
    ISneezeFunny

    Starbucks... are you serious?

    ... ARE. YOU. SERIOUS!?

    Holy mother of...

    I got to say, working in a clinic, you run into some pretty... stupid people.

    Darwin was wrong.

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:20 PM.