|
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2007, 10:21 AM
|
|
Hello leesh:
Homosexual sex isn't sick. Even cousins getting it on isn't sick. The AGE difference, however, is problematic.
excon
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2007, 10:27 AM
|
|
Americangaygoy I don't know of any cultures that deems it OK to have sex with your 1st cousin. Could you tell me one? I would love to read about them. *edit* so I could stay the hell away from them and keep my children away as well! Lol I am from KY and yes some of us even consider "kissin cousins" wrong.
|
|
|
Full Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2007, 11:56 AM
|
|
Throughout history, "divine monarchs" have preferred marriage partners that were in the same bloodline as a way to keep their blood pure. Many ancient societies preferred their leaders to marry their siblings or parents.
In today's world most cultures disfavor marriage to a first cousin; however, even in the United States, marriage between 1st cousins is legal. Cultures throughout Asia, the Near East, Europe, the Americas and Africa routinely marry cousins, too (not sure about Australia, but I'd venture a guess that cousins can and do marry there). The risk of birth defects/genetic disorders in the offspring of 1st cousins is about the same a in the offspring of women who give birth after the age of 40.
There is evidence that people are sexually offput by those with whom they cohabited in the first 5-10 years of life. Cousins are less likely to live together than siblings, and these cousins are far enough apart in age that he wouldn't have been young enough to form an aversion to her even if they did cohabitate. Therefore, there is nothing wrong with him mentally.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2007, 12:09 PM
|
|
OK, well maybe I'm not educated enough, but I still think he needs mental help, and I think he's a sicko. But I will do some reading about this acceptance of marrying in the family.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2007, 12:25 PM
|
|
Originally Posted by americangayboy
Throughout history, "divine monarchs" have prefered marriage partners that were in the same bloodline as a way to keep their blood pure. Many ancient societies prefered their leaders to marry their siblings or parents.
In today's world most cultures disfavor marriage to a first cousin; however, even in the United States, marriage between 1st cousins is legal. Cultures throughout Asia, the Near East, Europe, the Americas and Africa routinely marry cousins, too (not sure about Australia, but I'd venture a guess that cousins can and do marry there). The risk of birth defects/genetic disorders in the offspring of 1st cousins is about the same a in the offspring of women who give birth after the age of 40.
There is evidence that people are sexually offput by those with whom they cohabited in the first 5-10 years of life. Cousins are less likely to live together than siblings, and these cousins are far enough apart in age that he wouldn't have been young enough to form an aversion to her even if they did cohabitate. Therefore, there is nothing wrong with him mentally.
I guess we are as a routine, not accepting of this.
|
|
|
New Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2007, 12:37 PM
|
|
I Think Marry Family N Having Sex With Them Is Very Nasty That's Bnlood Right There
|
|
|
Full Member
|
|
Sep 2, 2007, 12:37 AM
|
|
I don't think there is anything psychologically wrong with this woman's cousin. Sorry if you don't agree, but there is no scientific reason to be so opposed to 1st cousins having sex/marrying. I do, however, think that persistent, unwanted sexual advances are inappropriate.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
View more questions
Search
|