In "other religion" there was a question on Noah's Ark.
In the end the topic changed into a debate on the size of the Ark versus the carrying capacity versus the number of all animals and plants that would have to be in the ark to survive the flood.
Tj3 (AKA Answerway's Toms 777) stated in response to Choux's post on the problems with the size of the ark : "Others used different assumptions and came up with a completely different answer".
How can anyone claim that the ark was big enough to contain all these animals in the required quantities and variations. Not even a ship double the size of the ark would be big enough!! Logical thinking and simple mathematics makes that clear beyond any doubt.
So where is the calculation that the Ark was big enough to provide sufficient space for all in it for such a long time?
Or can we accept the Biblical Noah's Ark story as just a copycat repeat of the Gilgamesh story?