|
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Feb 6, 2022, 03:03 PM
|
|
Please be specific.
If you believe the Bible, homosexual behavior is sin. Even if you don't believe the Bible, it is against the clear design of nature.
There is no porn in the Bible.
I've already told you we discussed "gender issues" with our kids. My grandchild is 15 months old.
|
|
|
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Feb 6, 2022, 03:28 PM
|
|
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
If you believe the Bible, homosexual behavior is sin. Even if you don't believe the Bible, it is against the clear design of nature.
"The clear design of nature" went topsy-turvy in Genesis 3, and unlimited possibilities began.
There is no porn in the Bible.
Read the Bible.
I've already told you we discussed "gender issues" with our kids.
Please give a summary.
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Feb 6, 2022, 03:31 PM
|
|
If you can't be specific, then you really should abandon the argument.
Your assessment of Genesis 3 has no support in the Bible unless you are prepared to say that those possibilities are sin.
Have read the Bible many, many times. No porn.
I'm not going to give a summary. It would be silly and pointless.
|
|
|
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Feb 6, 2022, 03:57 PM
|
|
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Have read the Bible many, many times. No porn.
Here's one instance:
Genesis 19. Drunken Lot and his two daughters in a cave.
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
I'm not going to give a summary. It would be silly and pointless.
Silly and pointless because it never happened.
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Feb 6, 2022, 03:58 PM
|
|
There are no graphic descriptions of sex and the story does not have the objective of simply arousing sexual desire. Most people find the account to be offensive and sinful as well they should. It is decidedly not porn. If that's the best you have, then you are finished.
You need to read a definition of what porn is.
|
|
|
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Feb 6, 2022, 04:05 PM
|
|
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
There are no graphic descriptions of sex and the story does not have the objective of simply arousing sexual desire. Most people find the account to be offensive and sinful as well they should. It is decidedly not porn. If that's the best you have, then you are finished.
You need to read a definition of what porn is.
Reading erotic fiction and non-fiction et al. causes the creation of pictures in one's head thus, Sunday School and Bible class teachers avoid this story (and others).
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Feb 6, 2022, 04:52 PM
|
|
I guess you think the story of Lot and his daughters is erotic. Pretty sure the average person does not since they regard a man getting his own daughters pregnant to be sickening. I've never seen anyone avoid this story. The lesson is very valuable.
We have reached our usual impasse. I wish you the best in your life and the hubster as well. God bless your family.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Feb 6, 2022, 07:13 PM
|
|
To Kill a Mockingbird: Challenged at the Moss Point, Miss. School District (1996) because the novel contains a racial epithet. Banned from the Lindale,Tex. advanced placement English reading list (1996) because the book "conflicted with the values of the community." Challenged by a Glynn County, Ga. (2001) school board member because of profanity. The novel was retained. Returned to the freshman reading list at Muskogee, Okla. High School (2001) despite complaints over the years from black students and parents about racial slurs in the text. Challenged in the Normal, ILL Community High Schools sophomore literature class (2003) as being degrading to African Americans. Challenged at the Stanford Middle School in Durham, N.C. (2004) because the 1961 Pulitzer Prize-winning novel uses the word "nigger."
Source: 2004 Banned Books Resource Guide
I linked to the most recent banning of Mockingbird which was within the month . It was a district in Seattle . It had nothing to do with the stereotype of what the south was in 1996 .
|
|
|
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Feb 6, 2022, 07:21 PM
|
|
Yep, tomder. I posted all that in #38.
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Feb 6, 2022, 07:46 PM
|
|
There is a vast difference between removing a book from a required reading list versus “banning” it.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Feb 7, 2022, 10:08 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Feb 7, 2022, 02:45 PM
|
|
Amazing how my view of the Aussies has changed over the past couple of years.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Feb 8, 2022, 07:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Feb 8, 2022, 08:01 PM
|
|
Fantastic. It's time to move on.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Feb 14, 2022, 08:00 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Feb 18, 2022, 07:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Feb 19, 2022, 07:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
We got us a convoy!
[ 19 Answers ]
Protests these days have to be big to be heard so the truckers in Australia have got themselves a convoy or is it 11 convoys focusing in on the National capital to shoo that little red fox out of the hen house. This is really putting your money where your mouth is
Steer clear of protest convoys,...
View more questions
Search
|