[themisfitkitten]

Our office is going to move and I was going to print out address change postcards to mail to our clients. Is there any reason not to use a simple square of bright paper (regular copy weight) instead of actual postcard, other than the durability factor?

I have seen plain paper flyers come through the mail, but they are normally folded and taped. Since most of our clients are local, I doubt the cards would get too terribly banged up--I just wanted to make sure these wouldn't be too lightweight to go through sorting machines or anything. Thanks!

[excon]

Hello t:

Seems to me that the cost to ASSURE that they go through the machines is worth it... I don't know how much you'd save by using plain paper, IF you'd save anything at all. What does a stiffer paper cost compared to plain paper?? I'd say next to NOTHING. If it's THOUSANDS of dollars you'll be saving, then that's another matter... But, I can't see it.

excon

[themisfitkitten]

Haha, thanks... I pretty much agree with you. My boss keeps going on about just using the bright paper we have in the office, and I keep saying "but I'm sure we can buy a pack of postcards in any color you want for a few bucks...." I'll let her know that it's probably fine to do on plain paper, but that it would really be more sensible to use card stock. ;)

-tmk

[Fr_Chuck]

I have read the eHow | How to Videos, Articles & More - Trusted Advice for the Curious Life | eHow.com stie and the US post office rules, while it seems there is no paper requirement there is a warning that normal paper may not go though their machines, which mean they could be destroyed or lost and so on.