Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    susus's Avatar
    susus Posts: 138, Reputation: 2
    Junior Member
     
    #1

    Oct 28, 2010, 03:11 PM
    Sliding masses
    The three blocks shown are relased at t=0 from the position shown in the figure. Assume that there is no friction between the table and M2, and that the two pulleys are massless and frictionless. The masses are: M1 = 3.0 kg, M2 = 7.0 kg, M3 = 5.0 kg.



    Calculate the speed of M2 at a time 1.35 s after the system is released from rest.?
    kpg0001's Avatar
    kpg0001 Posts: 88, Reputation: 12
    Junior Member
     
    #2

    Oct 28, 2010, 09:31 PM

    First look at M1:

    F=T1-m1(g)
    m1a=T1-m1(g)
    a=(T1-m1(g))/m1

    M2:

    F=T2-T1
    m2a=T2-T1
    a=(T2-T1)/m2

    M3:

    F=m3(g)-T2
    m3a=m3(g)-T2
    a=(m3(g)-T2)/m3

    So, you have:

    a=(T1-m1(g))/m
    a=(T2-T1)/m
    a=(m(g)-T2)/m

    From this you can solve for T1, T2, and acceleration.

    To find speed:

    v=at^2

    You've already solved for (a), now just plug in the time given for (t).

    Got it?
    susus's Avatar
    susus Posts: 138, Reputation: 2
    Junior Member
     
    #3

    Oct 28, 2010, 11:55 PM
    it did not work out with me !
    I got a = 7.5
    and then v = 13.66
    but it's not correct !
    susus's Avatar
    susus Posts: 138, Reputation: 2
    Junior Member
     
    #4

    Oct 28, 2010, 11:56 PM
    Comment on kpg0001's post
    it did not work out with me !
    I got a = 7.5
    and then v = 13.66
    but it's not correct !
    ebaines's Avatar
    ebaines Posts: 12,131, Reputation: 1307
    Expert
     
    #5

    Oct 29, 2010, 06:03 AM

    Two things:

    First, the value you calculated for is incorrect. If you use kpg0001's approach the three simultaneous equations you should be solving are:



    However, there's an easier way to find . If you consider that the sum of the external forces operating on this system that are causing it to move to the right is equal to the weight of m_2 minus the weight of m_1, then:



    Now solve for .

    Second, the equation for velocity is , not .
    kpg0001's Avatar
    kpg0001 Posts: 88, Reputation: 12
    Junior Member
     
    #6

    Oct 29, 2010, 11:30 AM
    I quit
    Unknown008's Avatar
    Unknown008 Posts: 8,076, Reputation: 723
    Uber Member
     
    #7

    Oct 29, 2010, 11:40 AM

    What? 0.o
    harum's Avatar
    harum Posts: 339, Reputation: 27
    Full Member
     
    #8

    Oct 29, 2010, 01:42 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by susus View Post
    it did not work out with me !
    i got a = 7.5
    and then v = 13.66
    but it's not correct !
    Three comments:

    First: Have you noticed that each number in the text of the problem is followed by some letters? They are called "units of measurements" and they are obligatory. Always! No exception! Attach the unit of measurement to each number you are posting.

    Second: 7.5*1.35 is not even equal to 13.66 (providing you have used consistent units of measurement).

    Third: Showing your work is not a totally bad idea.
    Unknown008's Avatar
    Unknown008 Posts: 8,076, Reputation: 723
    Uber Member
     
    #9

    Oct 29, 2010, 11:02 PM

    To show your work, don't hesitate to use the answer box instead of the comment box. The latter has limited space for characters.
    susus's Avatar
    susus Posts: 138, Reputation: 2
    Junior Member
     
    #10

    Nov 1, 2010, 10:19 AM
    Comment on ebaines's post
    Can you solve it with numbers please !
    It's not working out with me , I know I know it's too much being fool ! But I have no background in physics , I'm hardly doing this homework !
    ebaines's Avatar
    ebaines Posts: 12,131, Reputation: 1307
    Expert
     
    #11

    Nov 1, 2010, 10:28 AM

    susus - show us where you're having trouble. In my prevoius post I suggested using:



    and solve for a. What did you get?
    susus's Avatar
    susus Posts: 138, Reputation: 2
    Junior Member
     
    #12

    Nov 1, 2010, 02:17 PM
    Comment on ebaines's post
    Thanks I did it !
    lazykid2512's Avatar
    lazykid2512 Posts: 1, Reputation: 0
    New Member
     
    #13

    Nov 3, 2011, 07:51 PM
    The answer is 2.867 m/s :)
    ebaines's Avatar
    ebaines Posts: 12,131, Reputation: 1307
    Expert
     
    #14

    Nov 4, 2011, 06:22 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by lazykid2512 View Post
    the answer is 2.867 m/s :)
    Please note that this question was posted over a year ago, so I'm sure that susus has already submitted his homework. Also, your answer is incorrect.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Stoichiometry- molar masses [ 1 Answers ]

methanol was made in lab. Equation- CO + 2H2 giving one mol of CH3OH. A. how many grams of methanol would be produced in complete reaction. The answer is 40.3g. The reaction used 35.4g carbon monoxide and 10.2g hydrogen. I'm not sure what to do but I thought that I would find the number of moles...

Force of gravity between two masses [ 1 Answers ]

A force of gravity exists between two masses. How is the initial force of gravity (F1) affected if the separation distance between them is modified in the following ways to yield a new force of gravity (F2)? (a) The separation distance is doubled (i.e. increased by a factor of 2). F2 / F1 = ? ...

Tension - Two Masses [ 1 Answers ]

Can someone please help me to understand this problem? Two 100-N weights are attached to a scale as shown. What is the reading on the scale? (I have attached the picture) The correct answer is 100N but I do not understand why it is not 200N.


View more questions Search