Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #1

    Oct 18, 2010, 05:35 AM
    Joe Miller ARRESTS reporter
    Hello Tea Partiers:

    I thought the Tea Party revered the Constitution... The problem with that, is they only MOUTH those words, and have NO CLUE what's actually IN the Constitution...

    Tea Party candidates are fond of slogans and one of their favorites is: Government of the people, by the people, for the people. Apparently, Alaska Senate candidate Joe Miller means government by his PERSONAL SECURITY GUARDS.

    On Sunday, Miller's guards "arrested" and handcuffed Tony Hopfinger, the editor of the Alaska Dispatch website, as the editor attempted to interview Miller at the end of a public event in a public school in Anchorage.

    So, if you are a Tea Party candidate or a far-right extremist, your vision of government is one in which you get to demonize people for relying on and your opponent for supporting a public assistance while you TAKE FUNDS from that public assistance for your own family, demonize government subsidies while ACCEPTING such subsidies, rail against unaccountable government while yourself remaining unaccountable, and extoll the virtues of personal freedom, except for women whose personal freedom is the one thing--the only thing--the government should be regulating.

    Oh, and maybe religion because everyone should follow yours.

    If you are a Tea Party candidate or officeholder, you don't have to answer questions, you just make up your own truths, such as branding the respected editor of a news outlet to be an "irrational blogger" if they ask questions you don't like.

    Government for the people? Guard your democracy, citizens, or it will dissipate.

    excon
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,492, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #2

    Oct 18, 2010, 06:43 AM

    Yawn... funny how its fine to Bash Srah Palin at every turn, but left wing hacks are exempt from everything.

    Just because he was an extreme left wing hack/reporter doesn't give him rights to do and go anywhere he pleases.

    After all... the gun grabbers and the anti-free speech groups that want to silence the right are left wingers with no regard for the constitution or the Bill of Rights.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #3

    Oct 18, 2010, 06:54 AM

    As far as I can tell the "reporter " was acting more like a paparazzi than a legit reporter.He was sticking a camera in Miller's face and provoking him looking for him to slip up and say "macaca " .

    No arrest was made .No charges filed He was cuffed and escorted out because he was unruly.He was harassing Joe Miller and impeding him from leaving AFTER the town hall meeting .Miller had to turn around and leave in the other direction.That is when his security detail got between Miller and "the reporter " .

    The Alaska Dispatch is an on-line"newspaper" run by Lisa Murkowski loyalist ,blogger Tony Hopfinger (who is also the "reporter " in question ) .

    Just like in NY ,the so called journalists are trying to make themselves the story .These clowns are a disgrace to their profession .
    Is there a point in time in your mind where legitimate journalism crosses the line and a public figure's rights are violated ? Or is it a case where a public figure like Princess Di has to take the cr@p until the point they get killed in the pursuit ?
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #4

    Oct 18, 2010, 06:56 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by smoothy View Post
    Just because he was an extreme left wing hack/reporter doesn't give him rights to do and go anywhere he pleases.
    Hello smoothy - Tea Party Constitutionalist.

    Let's say this leftist WAS disturbing the peace. Does Joe Miller, and his gang, have the Constitutional RIGHT to arrest and detain him? He doesn't. Doesn't it bother you that, as a Senatorial candidate, he knows SO LITTLE about the Constitution??

    excon
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,492, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #5

    Oct 18, 2010, 11:37 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello smoothy - Tea Party Constitutionalist.

    Let's say this leftist WAS disturbing the peace. Does Joe Miller, and his gang, have the Constitutional RIGHT to arrest and detain him? He doesn't. Doesn't it bother you that, as a Senatorial candidate, he knows SO LITTLE about the Constitution????

    excon
    Well when you consider how the Messiah treated reporters that didn't bow and kiss his feet during the campaign. You do remember that he did that to anyone who was critical to his propaganda after all.

    We currently have a president that doesn't have a clue... or care about the Bill or Rights and the Constitution. THAT is a far bigger threat.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #6

    Oct 18, 2010, 02:07 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    No arrest was made .No charges filed He was cuffed and escorted out because he was unruly
    Hello tom:

    Yeah, nothing UNConstitutional going on HERE! Dude. You carry his water too??

    excon
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #7

    Oct 18, 2010, 02:51 PM

    That's funny, the cop in the video backed up the security guards that it was a private event. So what's your beef?
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #8

    Oct 18, 2010, 03:10 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    That's funny, the cop in the video backed up the security guards that it was a private event. So what's your beef?
    It was a town hall event. Aren't they public?
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #9

    Oct 18, 2010, 03:30 PM

    As public as the one where the President's staff hand picks the attendees .
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #10

    Oct 18, 2010, 03:32 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    As public as the one where the President's staff hand picks the attendees .
    Yeah, you're right. It's well known that former President Bush did that.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #11

    Oct 18, 2010, 03:55 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    Yeah, you're right. It's well known that former President Bush did that.
    And McCain:
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #12

    Oct 18, 2010, 04:10 PM

    Bush and McCain aren't the subject of this post. The subject is "Joe Miller ARRESTS reporter." It was a private event, crashed by a Murkowski sympathizer and security did their job. 'Nuff said.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #13

    Oct 18, 2010, 04:19 PM

    OK so we agree both side do that . It only reinforces my point that these events are not always "public" .

    Here is part of the statement released by the Miller campaign on the incident :
    “While I’ve gotten used to the blog Alaska Dispatch’s assault on me and my family, I never thought that it would lead to a physical assault. It’s too bad that this blogger would take advantage of a “Town Hall” meeting to create a publicity stunt just two weeks before the election.”

    The Miller campaign was required by the facility to provide security at the event. Even though Joe had spent more than 40 minutes answering questions from those in attendance, the blogger chased Miller to the exit after the event concluded in an attempt to create and then record a 'confrontation' with the candidate. While Miller attempted to calmly exit the facility, the blogger physically assaulted another individual and made threatening gestures and movements towards the candidate. At that point the security personnel had to take action and intervened and detained the irrational blogger, whose anger overcame him. It is also important to note that the security personnel did not know that the individual they detained was a blogger who was engaged in the campaign. To them, the blogger appeared irrational, angry and potentially violent.


    Bottom line... there is a point where a 'reporter' (blogger) crosses the line and harassed the person they are pursuing . That happened recently here in NY where a NY Post reporter was stalking the daughter of Guv candidate Carl Palidino. He got angry at the reporter's boss and it came to a head when the guy got in his face and harassed him. All the world got to see was an angry Paladino... not the reporter who was shooting footage into his 10 year old daughter's home ;or rummaging through her mail.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #14

    Oct 18, 2010, 04:21 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    Bush and McCain aren't the subject of this post. The subject is "Joe Miller ARRESTS reporter." It was a private event, crashed by a Murkowski sympathizer and security did their job. 'Nuff said.
    tomder went off-topic and led me astray.

    This is from Joe Miller's Facebook page: Town Hall Meeting with Joe Miller Sunday, October 17th at 3pm Central Middle School, 1405 E St, Anchorage, AK 99501 Your friends, colleges, family, acquaintances, neighbors, need to be informed and hear Joe Miller speak for himself.

    town hall meeting = informal public event featuring questions from the audience and answers from the candidate(s)

    If it weren't public, it wouldn't be a town hall meeting.
    cdad's Avatar
    cdad Posts: 12,700, Reputation: 1438
    Internet Research Expert
     
    #15

    Oct 18, 2010, 04:31 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello smoothy - Tea Party Constitutionalist.

    Let's say this leftist WAS disturbing the peace. Does Joe Miller, and his gang, have the Constitutional RIGHT to arrest and detain him? He doesn't. Doesn't it bother you that, as a Senatorial candidate, he knows SO LITTLE about the Constitution????

    excon
    I disagree with this statement. They have the right. Its called citizen's arrest. And when being witness to the commission of a crime they can have arrest powers as governed by the state.

    Citizen's arrest - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #16

    Oct 18, 2010, 05:20 PM

    Hello dad:

    From YOUR link: United States

    Each state, with the exception of North Carolina, permits citizen arrests if the commission of a felony is witnessed by the arresting citizen, or when a citizen is asked to assist in the apprehension of a suspect by police. The application of state laws varies widely with respect to misdemeanors, breaches of the peace, and felonies not witnessed by the arresting party.

    As it turns out, they DON'T have that authority.

    excon
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #17

    Oct 18, 2010, 05:26 PM

    Then no doubt Tony Hopfinger will file a complaint or file a suit against Miller and the security agency he hired for the event.

    But he won't . He accomplished his mission.He harassed the candidate and provoked a reaction . He got the Macacca moment... mission accomplished.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #18

    Oct 18, 2010, 05:27 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    town hall meeting = informal public event featuring questions from the audience and answers from the candidate(s)

    If it weren't public, it wouldn't be a town hall meeting.
    If Joe Miller rented the facilities, it's private, whatever he wants to call it and whoever he wants to have. Now if you want to address a different subject, perhaps you can be the first woman to weigh in on NOW's hypocrisy in their disrespect for Meg Whitman.
    cdad's Avatar
    cdad Posts: 12,700, Reputation: 1438
    Internet Research Expert
     
    #19

    Oct 18, 2010, 06:01 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello dad:

    From YOUR link: United States

    Each state, with the exception of North Carolina, permits citizen arrests if the commission of a felony is witnessed by the arresting citizen, or when a citizen is asked to assist in the apprehension of a suspect by police. The application of state laws varies widely with respect to misdemeanors, breaches of the peace, and felonies not witnessed by the arresting party.

    As it turns out, they DON'T have that authority.

    excon
    The common portion of it is the "felony" part. But it does state that for lessor crimes it varies by state. So you would have to defer to the state it is taking place in.

    Here is a sample for Alaska.

    http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0oG7n.87b...rrest_form.pdf


    Added after post:


    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m.../ai_n32226288/
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #20

    Oct 18, 2010, 06:06 PM

    Hello again, dad:

    Look. I don't know if they really had the legal power to arrest him. That may, or may not ever be determined... Nonetheless, I think it's a little brown shirty. That's all.

    excon

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Do arrests show up on LIVESCAN fingerprinting? [ 2 Answers ]

I was arrested two years ago for getting into a physical fight with an ex-boyfriend. I had to stay in jail for a few days but then I was released with NO conviction. I want to get a livescan fingerprinting, but I am wondering if this arrest will show up? I don't want this to hurt my chances of...

Searches, arrests and the Supreme Court [ 15 Answers ]

I haven’t had time to read the whole decision but a friend just e-mailed me that on Wednesday the US Supreme Court ruled that evidence seized in an improper arrest does not have to be thrown out IF the error which lead to the arrest (and subsequent finding of evidence and subsequent charges) was...

Arrests that had been expunged from FBI [ 9 Answers ]

Hello and good afternoon. Back in NY in 1996 I was charged with a class b misdemeanor but pled guilty to a non-criminal offense, known as a 'violation"(not a fingerprintable offense) in NY state. I paid a $50 fine, received a conditional discharge, and my criminal records were sealed as per 160.55...


View more questions Search