Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    md1872's Avatar
    md1872 Posts: 2, Reputation: 1
    New Member
     
    #1

    Aug 17, 2010, 03:30 PM
    What does this statement mean
    What does this statement means " Attorney to wife will reduce this report to written order and submit to other side and cout within 14 days. Orders require proof of submission to other attorney
    md1872's Avatar
    md1872 Posts: 2, Reputation: 1
    New Member
     
    #2

    Aug 17, 2010, 03:32 PM

    What does this statement means " Attorney to wife will reduce this report to written order and submit to other side and cout within 14 days. Orders require proof of submission to other attorney
    Alty's Avatar
    Alty Posts: 28,317, Reputation: 5972
    Pets Expert
     
    #3

    Aug 17, 2010, 03:51 PM

    Please be patient. All the people on this site are volunteers, we do not answer questions 24 hours a day, we have jobs, families and lives of our own.

    When the appropriate expert sees your question they'll answer it, so check back often.

    Thank you.
    sideoutshu's Avatar
    sideoutshu Posts: 225, Reputation: 23
    Full Member
     
    #4

    Aug 18, 2010, 06:44 AM

    What it looks like is that you got some sort of report from a guardian, arbitrator or other 3rd party at the request of a court and that the wife prevailed.

    Basically all that means is that the judge wants the attorney for the winning party to do his work for him and submit an order saying the same thing as the report for the judge's signature, so that the content of the report is binding on the parties.
    this8384's Avatar
    this8384 Posts: 4,564, Reputation: 485
    Ultra Member
     
    #5

    Sep 1, 2010, 10:43 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by md1872 View Post
    what does this statment means " Attorney to wife will reduce this report to written order and submit to other side and cout within 14 days. orders require proof of submission to other attorney
    The wife's attorney has been ordered or volunteered to put a report into a written order to be submitted and entered into court as a final order. Said order must be provided to the husband's attorney as well as the court within 14 days of this ruling being made.

    The wife's attorney must prove that s/he sent the order to the husband's attorney - this way, the husband's attorney can't argue that they never received the order in the incident there is an error which needs correcting.

    For example: my state has what is called the "five day rule" - Attorney A can submit paperwork to the court and Attorney B under the five day rule. If Attorney B objects to what Attorney A has submitted, it is their job to notify the court of their objection within five days of the submission. If no objection is made, the court will approve the submission from Attorney A.

    As the court is actually requiring proof from the wife's attorney that s/he submitted the documents to the husband's attorney, my guess is that one or both of these attorneys are not trusted to do what they say and the court doesn't want to keep playing around with this, so they're requiring proof upfront.
    this8384's Avatar
    this8384 Posts: 4,564, Reputation: 485
    Ultra Member
     
    #6

    Sep 1, 2010, 11:19 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by md1872 View Post
    what does this statment means " Attorney to wife will reduce this report to written order and submit to other side and cout within 14 days. orders require proof of submission to other attorney
    The wife's attorney has been ordered or volunteered to put a report into a written order to be submitted and entered into court as a final order. Said order must be provided to the husband's attorney as well as the court within 14 days of this ruling being made.

    The wife's attorney must prove that s/he sent the order to the husband's attorney - this way, the husband's attorney can't argue that they never received the order in the incident there is an error which needs correcting.

    For example: my state has what is called the "five day rule" - Attorney A can submit paperwork to the court and Attorney B under the five day rule. If Attorney B objects to what Attorney A has submitted, it is their job to notify the court of their objection within five days of the submission. If no objection is made, the court will approve the submission from Attorney A.

    As the court is actually requiring proof from the wife's attorney that s/he submitted the documents to the husband's attorney, my guess is that one or both of these attorneys are not trusted to do what they say and the court doesn't want to keep playing around with this, so they're requiring proof upfront.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Multiple-step income statement in good form and retained earnings statement [ 1 Answers ]

Hi I would like someone to check to see if I did this correctly, if I did not then please help. Thanks The Problem is: The following pretax amounts pertain to River Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2008. Sales... $400,000 Operating Expenses... 84,000 Extraordinary gain... 30,000...

Income statement, owners equity statement and balance sheet [ 6 Answers ]

Les Fleurs, a boutique in Paris, France, had the following accounts in its accounting records at December 31, 20X2 (amounts in Euros, denoted as "E") Purchases………………... E250,000 Freight In……………… E8,000 Sales discounts…………. 4,000 Purchase returns…….. 7,000 Inventory Sales…………………. ...

What is the correct financial statement-statement of cash flows wording? [ 2 Answers ]

Cash (used) in operating activities <10,000> Cash (used) in investing activities 10,000 Thank you for any help you can provide.


View more questions Search