I know that my area does not accept this type of header any longer.
Not true.
"C" headers are still permitted even in New York State.
The only difference is, that a design professional has to spec "C" headers in New York State based on the design load and be approved by the Building Official.
That's not the same as saying they are
'no longer accepted'.
They are.
Here is the text from the 2007 NY State Residential Code that permits alternate construction methods and designs:
"R103.3 Alternate materials, design and methods of construction and equipment.This code is not intended to prevent the use of any material or to prohibit any design or method of construction not specifically prescribed by this code, provided that any such alternative has been approved by the code enforcement official or the State Fire Prevention and Building Code Council.
An alternative material, design or method of construction may only be approved when it is determined to comply with the intent of the provisions of this code and be at least equivalent of that prescribed in this code in quality, strength, effectiveness, fire resistance, durability and safety."
You can see the entirety of the NY State Residential Code here:
http://publicecodes.citation.com/st/...0v07/index.htm
In other places where the International Residential Code is adopted, it is unnecessary for a design professional to sign-off on these type headers when they are built within the parameters cited by Table R602.7.2 in my previous link.
That said, I don't even see the need to add any jack studs.
These "C" headers appear fine as is.
Only if a structural professional says differently should the original poster do anything to alter his framing.
And I highly doubt one would...
---------------------------------------------------------
Side note:
I got burned by the very argument creahands has been making in a court case many years ago when I, as a builder, went as a professional witness for an plaintiff/owner who was suing a contractor (in part) for not using 'headers' over his windows and doors in an addition quite similar to what you see here.
I came with the Code tables showing the approved spans and sizes for exterior wall headers...
The defendant came with a letter from an engineer... stamped, signed and sealed attesting to the fact that the builder had used "C" headers and based on the load calculations were perfectly acceptable as a design alternative.
Bam.
Case closed.
Defendant won.
It's that simple.
-------------------
Moral of the story:
Just because what you see doesn't appear to be 'normal', does not mean it is not an accepted practice or was never an accepted practice or isn't doing its job structurally.
Nothing in any Code says that headers
must be made from built-up 2-bys, lvls, or solid sawn lumber...
Nothing in any Code says that headers
must have jack studs.
If the design can support the loads and transfer the loads to the foundation and a design professional says so.
Case closed.
Otherwise, whomever says differently, is just talking through his hard-hat.