[Racunovodja]

Hello again, R:

In fact, you don't have a case against your company. They reacted to the problem by WARNING the guy. They then told you to either accept what they did, or leave....

In fact, that is a reasoned response. Given that it's REASONABLE, you have NO case against them.

excon

OK... let's see deeper a bit..

Now, the corporation called an "assault" to be a "verbal abuse", issued wrong remedies based on it, and advising me to leave if I don't like it's remedy. (I was not fired).

If you still think this is REASONABLE, then I wish you to just experience the same incident as myself, in the very near future.

If the corporation did not take proper action aftremath, to protect safety of its employees could it be sued?

[JudyKayTee]

ok...let's see deeper a bit..

now, the corporation called an "assault" to be a "verbal abuse", issued wrong remedies based on it, and advising me to leave if I don't like it's remedy. (I was not fired).

If you still think this is REASONABLE, then I wish you to just experience the same incident as myself, in the very near future.

If the corporation did not take proper action aftremath, to protect safety of its employees could it be sued?

Obviously you don't want an answer but here's my last try.

IF YOU HAVE DAMAGES CONSULT AN ATTORNEY AND SUE YOUR EMPLOYER.

Your statement ("If you still think this is REASONABLE, then I wish you to just experience the same incident as myself, in the very near future") is petty and makes you look and sound foolish. I believe I can now understand your employer's position in this matter.

[excon]

ok...let's see deeper a bit..

If the corporation did not take proper action aftremath, to protect safety of its employees could it be sued?

Hello again, R:

Ok, let's.

The term "assault" is a legal term. The corporation isn't obliged to use legal terminology, nor is it obligated to enforce the law. The corporation identified the event as "verbal abuse", and it responded appropriately.

You had every opportunity to call the police. But you chose not to. It's THEIR job to enforce the laws against assault.

So, in answer to your query, IF the corporation didn't take action to protect its employees it COULD be sued. But, that isn't what happened here. If your attorney says different, I'm happy to be wrong.

excon

[Racunovodja]

Obviously you don't want an answer but here's my last try.

IF YOU HAVE DAMAGES CONSULT AN ATTORNEY AND SUE YOUR EMPLOYER.

Your statement ("If you still think this is REASONABLE, then I wish you to just experience the same incident as myself, in the very near future") is petty and makes you look and sound foolish. I believe I can now understand your employer's position in this matter.

Thank you for your help. I think I got it from your first post.

It was "exon" who tried to line up its answer with yours, which made me keep responding to the exon in here. Those were not to be compared, since "exon" believes that it was REASONABLE from the corporation valuing the assault as "a verbal abuse". That's why my "foolish" statement took the place.

Thanks for your help again.