Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    Galveston1's Avatar
    Galveston1 Posts: 362, Reputation: 53
    Full Member
     
    #1

    Oct 30, 2008, 12:16 PM
    Who is trying to buy the presidency?
    The word is that Obama has spent $300,000,000.00 (before tha last infomercials). No one in their right mind believes this astronomical sum came from blue collar workers. So I would like to know just who has that kind of money and wants Obama in the White House. This whole thing stinks like a skunk works!
    magprob's Avatar
    magprob Posts: 1,877, Reputation: 300
    Ultra Member
     
    #2

    Oct 30, 2008, 12:24 PM

    Trilateral Commission. The elitist think tank.
    Do you know who Zbigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller are? Are you aware of their history together? Not something FOX news goes into much detail about.
    Glad you noticed though.
    Galveston1's Avatar
    Galveston1 Posts: 362, Reputation: 53
    Full Member
     
    #3

    Oct 30, 2008, 12:28 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by magprob View Post
    Trilateral Commission. The elitist think tank.
    Do you know who Zbigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller are? Are you aware of their history together? Not something FOX news goes into much detail about.
    Glad you noticed though.
    Thanks. That's what I'm getting at. The super rich socialistic elites want Obama in. That doesn't bode well for the rest of us. You didn't mention George Soros.
    jjwoodhull's Avatar
    jjwoodhull Posts: 1,378, Reputation: 239
    Ultra Member
     
    #4

    Oct 30, 2008, 12:31 PM
    What or who is "the word"? Can you please quote your source? Also, to compare, how much has McCain spent?
    magprob's Avatar
    magprob Posts: 1,877, Reputation: 300
    Ultra Member
     
    #5

    Oct 30, 2008, 12:44 PM

    I'm trying to master George Soros' Forex trading scam. Then take it global to the poorest among us.
    magprob's Avatar
    magprob Posts: 1,877, Reputation: 300
    Ultra Member
     
    #6

    Oct 30, 2008, 12:45 PM
    I've given up on the Free Market Ponzi Scheme since only the TOP players are getting paid these days.
    Besides, we need to face it, free market capitalism has finally consumed itself. The big cats have won. They have forclosed on our industry and bought them out at pennies on the dollar. The have forclosed on our farmers and bought them out at pennies on the dollar. How you ask? Because they control commodities markets that these industries count on to bring a good price. It has all been controlled and manipulated to put American wealth into the hands of a few. There is your capitalism my friend. There is your future with any puppet they put in place.
    spitvenom's Avatar
    spitvenom Posts: 1,266, Reputation: 373
    Ultra Member
     
    #7

    Oct 30, 2008, 01:34 PM

    Think about it if 18,000,000 million people who voted for Obama all gave 20 dollars that is what $360,000,000. Of course not every one of them gave money. But for example my family including my mom, dad, sister, fiancée, Etc... we have probably given a total of about $5,000 since March. My family is not Rich at all I guess we are considered middle class. But we believe in Obama so we are willing to give up the money to help him out.
    Galveston1's Avatar
    Galveston1 Posts: 362, Reputation: 53
    Full Member
     
    #8

    Nov 1, 2008, 05:03 PM

    I'd be willing to bet not nearly 18,000,000 of those Obama voters donated $20 each to his campaign. I imagine (just me, of course) that SOME of them are getting paid to vote for him. If not outright, they will get their pay after he is elected and he spreads that wealth their way.
    progunr's Avatar
    progunr Posts: 1,971, Reputation: 288
    Ultra Member
     
    #9

    Nov 1, 2008, 05:07 PM

    Radio talk show host Laura Ingram was able to process a $15 donation using the name Saddam Hussein with her own credit card over the internet.

    That pretty much says it all.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #10

    Nov 1, 2008, 06:32 PM
    Hello Gal:

    Geez. I thought you guys LIKED the free market... You want to LIMIT what he spends?? You want to make the elections more FAIR? You want to EVEN things out?? You have something against the RICH guy? Sounds like SOCIALISM to me.

    Bwa, ha ha ha.

    excon
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #11

    Nov 2, 2008, 03:39 AM

    Foreign donationas are still illegal and a lack of transparency is also.
    Until very recently, when the MSM was forced to actually report on it(so blatant was the violations) ;the Obama campaign had no safeguards in its online fundraising Web site designed to weed out foreign donors. Instead, its operations appeared to be designed specifically to enhance the flow of illegal money. $218 million has been taken by Obama from donors whose names it is keeping secret, according to FEC spokesman Robert Biersack.

    N0 I would not limit spending on campaigns.However it is telling that Obama's 1st campaign pledge(after he had promised not to run for the Presidency that is) was to live within the limits of Federal matching limits. That became his 1st of his many lies in this campaign.
    twinkiedooter's Avatar
    twinkiedooter Posts: 12,172, Reputation: 1054
    Uber Member
     
    #12

    Nov 2, 2008, 06:59 PM

    Yes, I agree with you Tom. You have to remember all those dead people are going to be voting in alphabetical order again this election as well. It's so nice they line up alphabetically, isn't it? Makes it much easier on the person checking their voter registration cards. He's going to have to have every dead person in America vote for him as he's just sooo wonderful. I'm sure he can arrange for that to be taken care of with all the money he's collected so far to buy his win.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Power of the Presidency [ 2 Answers ]

The Power of the Presidency has been cause for debate MAINLY because why? A) The presidency is the most powerful office in the world. B) The Constitution provided a loose definition of executive power. C) The presidency is an office that operates in full view of the public. D) Leaders wanted to...

The Imperial Presidency [ 20 Answers ]

Hello Rightys: It appears that George Bush has taken on some additional duties for himself(and I use the term loosely). You could argue that he hasn't, and you'd be wrong. However, my question isn't about him. Of course, if his expanded view of the presidency isn't curtailed, whoever...

Congress vs. Presidency during the late 20th century [ 3 Answers ]

Who holds the most power and what did the presidents do during this period


View more questions Search