[vdanika]

As an investor, is paid in or earned capital more important, why
As an investor, are basic or diluted earnins per share more important, why

[AdamUTsel]

An investor would rather see earned capital (i.e. net income from prior periods). This solely reflects the performance of the business. Paid in capital is money given by investors (i.e. shareholders of the company). This does not reflect performance of the company, but rather investors willingness to to invest in a company's future performance.

As an investor, diluted EPS is more useful. But first, understand the two concepts: Basic vs. Diluted to understand why. In financial reporting two EPS numbers are commonly reported: Basic and Diluted EPS. The Basic EPS is calculated by dividing income available for distribution to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. The number calculated this way excludes any possible dilution stemming from outstanding dilutive securities, such as options, warrants, convertible bonds, or convertible preferred stock. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution from such dilutive securities. The companies that don't have any dilutive securities, or the companies that report net losses, report only Basic EPS. In case of a net loss, dilutive securities would improve negative EPS and have an anti-dilutive effect. The value of diluted EPS is always lower than basic value and is more relevant in investment decisions, since it indicates somewhat of a worst-case scenario. Since dilutive EPS is more relevant, investors would prefer this data when making investment decisions.