Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    progunr's Avatar
    progunr Posts: 1,971, Reputation: 288
    Ultra Member
     
    #1

    Jul 17, 2008, 01:19 PM
    It has only been three days.
    Since President Bush lifted the ban on off shore drilling.

    The price of a barrel has fallen by $14.00, in those three days.

    You still believe that starting to obtain our own oil will have NO immediate effect on the price?

    I say the proof speaks much louder than those who differ on this opinion.
    George_1950's Avatar
    George_1950 Posts: 3,099, Reputation: 236
    Ultra Member
     
    #2

    Jul 17, 2008, 01:25 PM
    Hard to say because Congress is considering (more?) regulation of speculators in the market, and Bush is allowing a state department secretary to discuss nuclear issues with Iran. Maybe other issues as well. Cause and effect is sometimes uncertain. But we know BO didn't do it.
    progunr's Avatar
    progunr Posts: 1,971, Reputation: 288
    Ultra Member
     
    #3

    Jul 17, 2008, 01:27 PM
    Yes, perhaps, but were not those issues present on the horizon prior to the lifting of the ban?

    Did any of those issues JUST come to light in the past three days?
    George_1950's Avatar
    George_1950 Posts: 3,099, Reputation: 236
    Ultra Member
     
    #4

    Jul 17, 2008, 01:31 PM
    Talks with Iran... yes
    Choux's Avatar
    Choux Posts: 3,047, Reputation: 376
    Ultra Member
     
    #5

    Jul 17, 2008, 01:33 PM
    You don't know how to think clearly, pro.

    Just because two events happen very close to each other in time does *not mean* they have any connection to each other.

    An individual has to study and understand, in this case, everything that is going on with Big Oil.
    progunr's Avatar
    progunr Posts: 1,971, Reputation: 288
    Ultra Member
     
    #6

    Jul 17, 2008, 01:35 PM
    OK.

    Lifting of the ban, or the "promise" of plans to have a State Department Secretary talk with Iran.

    I'll still lean towards the lifting of the ban as a more likely cause for such a dramatic drop in such a short period.

    We do agree 100% that Obama had NOTHING to do with it.
    George_1950's Avatar
    George_1950 Posts: 3,099, Reputation: 236
    Ultra Member
     
    #7

    Jul 17, 2008, 01:38 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by progunr
    OK.
    ...
    We do agree 100% that Obama had NOTHING to do with it.
    Obama hasn't had much to do with anything except deep-sixing Hillary. Don't know that that was much of an accomplishment, other than a win is a win, as they say.
    progunr's Avatar
    progunr Posts: 1,971, Reputation: 288
    Ultra Member
     
    #8

    Jul 17, 2008, 01:39 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Choux
    You don't know how to think clearly, pro.

    Just because two events happen very close to each other in time does *not mean* they have any connection to each other.

    An individual has to study and understand, in this case, everything that is going on with Big Oil.
    It is very amusing the way you argue.

    Lets try your method.

    Because two events happen very close to each other in time does not mean that it is nothing more than a coincidence.

    The "possibility" that one event has an effect on the other is a very real one.
    Choux's Avatar
    Choux Posts: 3,047, Reputation: 376
    Ultra Member
     
    #9

    Jul 17, 2008, 01:59 PM
    Man, you're hopeless in the logical thinking department!
    Galveston1's Avatar
    Galveston1 Posts: 362, Reputation: 53
    Full Member
     
    #10

    Jul 17, 2008, 03:33 PM
    Anything that scares speculators is going to cause some drop in prices. Most of these people are hair-trigger nervous. I would be too if I had as much riding on it as they do.
    purplewings's Avatar
    purplewings Posts: 145, Reputation: 24
    Junior Member
     
    #11

    Jul 17, 2008, 04:09 PM
    Even if the home drilling lowers the cost of gasoline a few cents over time, it isn't going to be enough to make a difference. Our government gets too much money from our gas tax and from the big oil companies to ever want to just let it go.
    RickJ's Avatar
    RickJ Posts: 7,762, Reputation: 864
    Uber Member
     
    #12

    Jul 18, 2008, 11:34 AM
    Good move on lifting the ban. Now let's also 1) Drill into the ground and 2) continue to promote the r & d of alternative power sources so that we can be self sufficient.

    I KNOW we can be.
    progunr's Avatar
    progunr Posts: 1,971, Reputation: 288
    Ultra Member
     
    #13

    Jul 18, 2008, 11:37 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by RickJ
    Good move on lifting the ban. Now let's also 1) Drill into the ground and 2) continue to promote the r & d of alternative power sources so that we can be self sufficient.

    I KNOW we can be.
    The sad part is it is now up to the "don't drill Democrats" to finish what the President has started.

    They are not listening to the American people, as usual.

    They are HAPPY about $4 a gallon gas.
    George_1950's Avatar
    George_1950 Posts: 3,099, Reputation: 236
    Ultra Member
     
    #14

    Jul 18, 2008, 11:45 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by progunr
    The sad part is it is now up to the "don't drill Democrats" to finish what the President has started.

    They are not listening to the American people, as usual.

    They are HAPPY about $4 a gallon gas.
    Well, it's up to irate Americans to demand the gov't to get moving. I hope the Dems remain arrogant, ignoring the people and we can finish the job in November. The Dems would just as soon the price go up to $5 or $6 per gallon.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #15

    Jul 18, 2008, 11:52 AM
    I addressed the issue here

    https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/govern...do-237567.html

    All I have to say is the canard about it taking 5-10 years to have an impact has been forever buried.
    progunr's Avatar
    progunr Posts: 1,971, Reputation: 288
    Ultra Member
     
    #16

    Jul 18, 2008, 11:58 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by George_1950
    Well, it's up to irate Americans to demand the gov't to get moving. I hope the Dems remain arrogant, ignoring the people and we can finish the job in November. The Dems would just as soon the price go up to $5 or $6 per gallon.
    Or even $12 as the Messiah has predicted.

    Their behavior is beyond shameful.
    George_1950's Avatar
    George_1950 Posts: 3,099, Reputation: 236
    Ultra Member
     
    #17

    Jul 18, 2008, 12:23 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by progunr
    Or even $12 as the Messiah has predicted.

    Their behavior is beyond shameful.
    They don't want to be elected (and can't be if they tell the truth); they want to be anointed, coronated: "Yet, for all the adoring throngs that are likely to greet the Democratic contender and the eight foreign leaders he will meet, the trip is aimed at voters back home, where Mr Obama’s youth and inexperience have raised significant doubts that he has the gravitas, grit and sure-footedness to be their next commander-in-chief." Barack Obama embarks on world tour — to reach voters in his backyard - Times Online
    spitvenom's Avatar
    spitvenom Posts: 1,266, Reputation: 373
    Ultra Member
     
    #18

    Jul 18, 2008, 12:28 PM
    Hopefully this trend will continue lets see how next week goes. $129.88 (I think that is what I saw it was today)a barrel is still horrible but it is a start. I hardly ever agree with Tom Pro and George but we need to start drilling here. I am all for getting away from oil but that just isn't a reality at the moment. That is definitely the one thing I don't agree with Obama with.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #19

    Jul 18, 2008, 12:28 PM
    Aside from lifting the ban, it was reported in our paper that Americans have finally cut back on driving. Nothing like the prospect of more drilling, supply increases and the threat of people not buying your product to drive prices down.
    progunr's Avatar
    progunr Posts: 1,971, Reputation: 288
    Ultra Member
     
    #20

    Jul 18, 2008, 01:30 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by spitvenom
    Hopefully this trend will continue lets see how next week goes. $129.88 (I think that is what I saw it was today)a barrel is still horrible but it is a start. I hardly ever agree with Tom Pro and George but we need to start drilling here. I am all for getting away from oil but that just isn't a reality at the moment. That is definitely the one thing I don't agree with Obama with.
    I know that was hard to admit, I respect your honesty, and your independence in knowing what is right, and not sticking in there with the rest of the Democratic idiots.

    I mean really, is there anyone on this site, who can justify the "don't drill" position that these people are stuck on?

    How would drilling tomorrow, where ever there is a "substantial" deposit of our own oil, be considered anything but a GOOD idea, and the RIGHT thing to do?

    The old excuse about the 58, or 68, or 128 million acres already approved crap is outdated.

    If the Oil companies had a chance to make a reasonable profit in those areas, they would already be drilling. They know what they are talking about when they tell us that they need access to the areas with HUGE deposits of oil and these "approved" acres don't have that.

    Then this idiotic crap about not getting any of this new oil to the pump for 10 years!

    First of all, it is a lie.

    Second of all, what is going to change in the next 10 years that would lead anyone to believe that we WON'T be using gas then?

    And without starting to drill now, how much will we be paying in 10 years?

    It really is enough to make a sensible person want to SCREAM!!

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

I started my period 2 days after unprotected sex, It only lasted 2 1/2 days. [ 6 Answers ]

I know I've already asked if I could be pregnant because I started my period only 2 days after having sex. I've gotten feed back and that reassured me, but the weird thing is my period only lasted 2 days. I started on Tuesday morning and by late thursdy night I was already finished, which isn't...

7 days late, spotting last 2 days [ 4 Answers ]

Hi, My period is 7 days late today. The past couple of days I've been having cramps and I'm always sure my period has started but when I go to the bathroom there's nothing in my underware, just some brown smearing when I wipe. My husband and I have been trying to conceive for 2 months... I tested...

B1 (75 days) + L1 (135 Days) + Family = Filing Staus? [ 7 Answers ]

I came to US on L1 visa (Company Transfer) with my wife (non-working) and son (Infant) on L2 Visa on Aug, 11 2007. Located in Dallas/Tx with no state tax and getting US salary with tax witholding based on M5 status. My total stay in L1 visa is <183, but stayed on B1 Visa in Feb-May 2007 for...

14 days late, then it only lasts for 3 days. [ 2 Answers ]

Okay, I was 14 days late with my period I was supposed to have gotten it on the 31st of January, but I didn't get anything until the 14th of this month.. Im still feeling strange... and concerend... but I have heard that its still possible that you get your period with still being pregnant. I know...

Need to give 60 days notice, but rent is increasing in thirty days [ 3 Answers ]

I have rented the condo I am in now for over two years. After the initial lease term of one year, I went on a month-to-month basis. I am required to give 60 days notice prior to vacating the property. My landlord notified me at the end of this month (february) that the rent would be...


View more questions Search