Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    JudyKayTee's Avatar
    JudyKayTee Posts: 46,503, Reputation: 4600
    Uber Member
     
    #41

    Jul 13, 2008, 10:12 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Credendovidis
    I strongly support an OFFICIAL legal arrangement that one can put in one's will to ensure that one is allowed to die when all other dignified options are finished.


    A Will is not the place to cover this - a Will is read/probated following death, also does not take effect until after death.
    Credendovidis's Avatar
    Credendovidis Posts: 1,593, Reputation: 66
    -
     
    #42

    Jul 13, 2008, 10:14 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by JudyKayTee
    A Will is not the place to cover this - a Will is read/probated following death, also does not take effect until after death.
    Point taken. What other legal process do you suggest more appropriate?

    :)

    ·
    N0help4u's Avatar
    N0help4u Posts: 19,823, Reputation: 2035
    Uber Member
     
    #43

    Jul 13, 2008, 10:16 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by JudyKayTee
    A Will is not the place to cover this - a Will is read/probated following death, also does not take effect until after death.
    I was thinking that too. It has to be a living will that your lawyer has for when the situation arises.
    JudyKayTee's Avatar
    JudyKayTee Posts: 46,503, Reputation: 4600
    Uber Member
     
    #44

    Jul 13, 2008, 10:34 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Credendovidis
    Point taken. What other legal process do you suggest more appropriate?]


    Living Will, Do Not Resuscitate Order - but I've posted this before. My husband was a Doctor of Pharmacy, thought he knew how to guarantee his wishes would be followed, knew he was a dying man, had a DNR, a Living Will - made his intent and wishes very well known to all his Doctors as well as family.

    During his final hospitalization he was resuscitated 3 times - one time the hospital didn't have the DNR because it was in the file from his previous hospitalization and they hadn't combined the files yet (I had also handed them a copy when he was admitted); once he "simply stopped breathing" but had no cardiac complications so he was put on a ventilator; once the explanation was, "Whoops." I never would have known about the 3rd Resuscitation except for the paddle/burn marks on his chest.

    He suffered beyond words for over 3 weeks. Twenty-two times they told me there was over a 60% chance that he would not live through the night.

    His suffering was horrific and I had to watch this man who really was my world go through it - and I was helpless. In the end every test had been done, some of them twice, he was medically and legally brain dead, he responded to nothing (not pain, not light, not sounds) and the Social Worker appeared (I have no idea where she had been hiding for over 3 weeks), found out he had long term health care insurance and suggested I make inquiries into nursing homes. That's when I called my Attorney.

    The day my husband died I fought the hospital which insisted he have dialysis while waiting for hospice to arrive. They lost the fight.

    I wish I had an answer - I don't know how you protect yourself or your loved ones. I truly agonize over the whole experience and I have no idea what I could have done.

    I would have died for him - and I was helpless to do anything but hold his hand and watch him pass, a shell of who he was - after over 3 horrific weeks which served absolutely no purpose.
    N0help4u's Avatar
    N0help4u Posts: 19,823, Reputation: 2035
    Uber Member
     
    #45

    Jul 13, 2008, 10:52 AM
    I heard you can sue if they do not follow the DNR.

    You did everything you could have. Sometimes situations happen that make a mess of things.
    Fr_Chuck's Avatar
    Fr_Chuck Posts: 81,301, Reputation: 7692
    Expert
     
    #46

    Jul 13, 2008, 11:07 AM
    Yes it is hard, but to follow up with the original question, the state execution and the natural dying of someone is two different things.
    The state has the right to decide the punishment and even from most of the major religions they have always reconised this right that the state has to punish criminals, As for allowing a person to die, while there should be no direct causing it, suicide, if a persons body is to the point of death and only being keep alive with machines ( not counting feeding) then a person should have the right to decide to refuse medical treatment.
    JudyKayTee's Avatar
    JudyKayTee Posts: 46,503, Reputation: 4600
    Uber Member
     
    #47

    Jul 13, 2008, 11:15 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Fr_Chuck
    Yes it is hard, but to follow up with the orginal question, the state execution and the natural dying of someone is two different things.
    The state has the right to decide the punishment and even from most of the major religions they have always reconised this right that the state has to punish criminals, As for allowing a person to die, while there should be no direct causing it, sucide, if a persons body is to the point of death and only being keep alive with machines ( not counting feeding) then a person should have the right to decide to refuse medical treatment.


    But how do you make certain your wishes will be followed? As I said - all of this was covered and still I was helpless.
    Credendovidis's Avatar
    Credendovidis Posts: 1,593, Reputation: 66
    -
     
    #48

    Jul 13, 2008, 04:37 PM
    Thanks JudyKayTee, Nohelp4u, and Fr. Chuck for your posts.
    Seems that we still do not have a modus that provides some clarity on the procedure that is followed, how such a procedure is ensured, and what guarantees we have that - goodwilling - hospital staff sidesteps such clear instructions.

    Also thanks JudyKayTee for your story on what you and your husband had to go through.
    I am much obliged for your report !

    :)

    ·
    inthebox's Avatar
    inthebox Posts: 787, Reputation: 179
    Senior Member
     
    #49

    Jul 13, 2008, 06:31 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Choux
    Box guy,

    Theology is the study of god fantasy and make believe. YOu don't seem to understand the basis of your religion.

    The basis of Christianity is that GodAlmighty will torment you in hell for *eternity* if you, his "beloved" creation do not follow his rules. Salvation is the only way an individual can escape this horrific situation and "go to heaven".

    That is what you BELIEVE whether you understand it or not.

    It is not true, you just *believe it is true*. It is religion, faith.

    Choux

    If you think God and Christianity are just fantasies, why is it that you insist that You alone know what these "fantasies" consist of?

    Despite what you may believe about God and Christianity, and this probably stems from some emotional trauma at the hands of Christians, which is inexcusable, God loves you. :D

    John 3:16 :)

    The parable of the prodigal son. ;)
    Credendovidis's Avatar
    Credendovidis Posts: 1,593, Reputation: 66
    -
     
    #50

    Jul 13, 2008, 06:55 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by inthebox
    God loves you.
    That is what you BELIEVE ...

    :rolleyes:

    ·
    inthebox's Avatar
    inthebox Posts: 787, Reputation: 179
    Senior Member
     
    #51

    Jul 13, 2008, 06:58 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by michealb
    But I still say if you are so sure that paradise awaits you why not go as soon as possible. It seems like a simple logic problem to me. If your here and you are sure over there is better why not go over there as soon as you can. Of course as an atheist every moment I'm here is precious because there isn't somewhere better to go, so my goal is to live as long as possible but for christians you should logically have the exact opposite goal. To live a short of a life as possible with very little sin and of course the shorter you live the less time you will have to be temped by sin.

    "Paradise" is my selfish motive. :( You don't have to believe in God, you see people chase "paradise" through drugs, or sex, or materialism, or whatever happens to float their boat.

    A Christ follower's life is not his own, it is surrendered to God. It is His blood that covers all sin. He calls us to love and serve others just as He has done with us. 1 John.

    He tells us that this life is not about us, but of God's, Luke 14 :26-27, 33. "thy will be done."
    And it isn't going to be easy: "take up your cross," "the first will be last," Blessed are the meek, the poor in spirit," there will be persecutions, etc...

    But faith, hope, love, joy, peace these are the fruit of the Spirit, Galatians 5:22-23. You don't have to wait till you die for it. :D
    Credendovidis's Avatar
    Credendovidis Posts: 1,593, Reputation: 66
    -
     
    #52

    Jul 13, 2008, 07:04 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by inthebox
    But faith, hope, love, joy, peace these are the fruit of the Spirit, Galatians 5:22-23. You don't have to wait till you die for it.
    That is what you BELIEVE !

    :rolleyes:

    ·
    inthebox's Avatar
    inthebox Posts: 787, Reputation: 179
    Senior Member
     
    #53

    Jul 13, 2008, 07:09 PM
    Yes, it is what I believe, backed up Biblically.

    I wanted to point out the error in Michaelb's logic. That error stems from common misconceptions about Christianity, perpetuated by people, in this case, who don't believe in God or Christianity. ;)
    inthebox's Avatar
    inthebox Posts: 787, Reputation: 179
    Senior Member
     
    #54

    Jul 13, 2008, 07:14 PM

    What is so special in this case is that it is the first ever Italian court decision to allow suspending of any medical treatment and (artificial) ways of sustaining life. And also that the judgment drew instant criticism from the Vatican, which condemned it as as euthanasia.
    I actually disagree with the Vatican's definition of euthanasia on this.

    Living wills or advanced directives allow for withholding treatment, and allowing a person to die. This even happens in the Catholic hospital I work at. ;)
    michealb's Avatar
    michealb Posts: 484, Reputation: 129
    Full Member
     
    #55

    Jul 13, 2008, 07:26 PM
    I still don't see the error in my logic. Just because people chase paradise on earth doesn't really have anything to do with my argument. Even if you have everything you ever wanted on earth and have wealth of spirit, heaven would still suppose to be better. Why would you delay going there?
    inthebox's Avatar
    inthebox Posts: 787, Reputation: 179
    Senior Member
     
    #56

    Jul 13, 2008, 07:54 PM
    A Christ follower's life is not his own, it is surrendered to God. It is His blood that covers all sin. He calls us to love and serve others just as He has done with us. 1 John.
    Alty's Avatar
    Alty Posts: 28,317, Reputation: 5972
    Pets Expert
     
    #57

    Jul 13, 2008, 08:35 PM
    Really kids, can't we just agree to disagree already. No one is going to convince the opposing side that they are right, it isn't possible.

    Quoting the bible isn't going to work, talking about your faith isn't going to work, nothing is going to work. If you all want to fight then fine, go for it, but this fight is a lesson in futility.

    The atheists don't believe in God, they will do everything to dispute the existence of God, the Christians believe in God and will do everything to dispute the atheists . Do you really think that anyone is going to change their beliefs because of what is said here? If anything, the only result is anger.

    So, believe what you believe, be happy with that belief, and your right to believe it. You do not have to explain or justify your belief, and doing so will get you no where.

    I'm just so darn tired of all the fighting. :(
    Credendovidis's Avatar
    Credendovidis Posts: 1,593, Reputation: 66
    -
     
    #58

    Jul 14, 2008, 04:17 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Altenweg
    The atheists don't believe in God, they will do everything to dispute the existence of God...
    Total nonsense!!
    All I ask for is objective supporting evidence for the existence of a "God" deity with all the supra-natural powers as is claimed.
    I have asked that thousands of time - if not more. Never has anyone really attempted to provide that evidence.

    STILL theists seem to be incapable of admitting that all they BELIEVE is based on dogmatic claims that can not be checked, therefore have no basis of objective supported evidence.

    My conclusion therefore can only be : theists deep down know that what ever they believe is dogmatic bull manure, but can't bring themselves to admit that.

    Believe whatever you want, but respect that any other world view is just as valid as your own world view. I do. Most theists can't do that.

    Now : why would that be??

    :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

    ·
    Choux's Avatar
    Choux Posts: 3,047, Reputation: 376
    Ultra Member
     
    #59

    Jul 14, 2008, 12:26 PM
    Boxed in Guy,

    What you *BELIEVE* is just fantasy (and nonsense!)to me and a majority of folks on planet earth. :D
    Alty's Avatar
    Alty Posts: 28,317, Reputation: 5972
    Pets Expert
     
    #60

    Jul 14, 2008, 12:34 PM
    Total nonsense!!
    All I ask for is objective supporting evidence for the existence of a "God" deity with all the supra-natural powers as is claimed.
    I have asked that thousands of time - if not more. Never has anyone really attempted to provide that evidence.
    It's not my job to prove it to you, and you don't really want proof Cred, you want to fight, I've read your posts. I find it very amusing that a man that doesn't believe in God spends the majority of his time on the religious boards putting down peoples beliefs and starting arguments.

    When something is said that you cannot dispute, you start name calling and or picking out spelling errors etc. You amuse me. What do you hope to accomplish? Do you want people to stop believing in God, give up and come to your side? What is all this arguing and fighting about? Can't you just accept peoples beliefs?

    Tell you what, you want proof that God exists, well I want proof that he doesn't. Substantial proof, not just, can you see him, no, therefore he doesn't exist. Don't quote the bible, because I don't believe in the bible. Prove it to me.

    Good luck. :)

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search


Check out some similar questions!

Herpes, Law, and Morality. [ 25 Answers ]

I've had herpes since I was 15, I was raped. Anyway I've told almost all of my partners since then until my ex, R. I got really drunk one night and forgot. I didn't tell him. After that I was afraid to tell him. I fell in love. I never did tell him. He's really good friends with my other ex, B. B...

Euthanasia. How do you feel about it? [ 28 Answers ]

As part of my job I have had to euthanize well over 1000 animals that people decided they didn't want. I worked out of a shelter in NC. While my primary job was to investigate cases of animal cruelty, many times I had to put down animals using various methods. I will tell you I don't believe in the...

Morality and religion [ 47 Answers ]

Can morality be taught apart from religion, especially from the doctrine(s) of, say, Lutheranism or Catholicism or even just Christianity in general? I'm thinking of the sex ed thread in which several posters claimed there can be no effective sex ed classes without moral teaching and others...

Ethics and Morality [ 8 Answers ]

I am having a debate with my grandfather: What are the ethics and morality involved in Christianity, Wicca, Islam, and Judaism?


View more questions Search