Originally Posted by
excon
Hello Prog:
What do I think about what he said?
I think two things: 1) rape victims have been victimized a second time by the judicial system since rape was made a crime, and 2) in the unlikely event that I'd ever be charged with anything, I'd want HIM as my lawyer.
We COULD, however, talk about the bigger picture regarding ANY vigorous defense of ANY criminal defendant by ANY criminal defense attorney. If we did, mee theenks you'd object to THEM too.
excon
Surprise! No, I would not, as long as this "vigorous" defensive cross examination was not taking place with a child, who has been raped, who is under the age of 12 years old, and when the "intent" is to do that, not just to defend his client.
Seriously, when I hear this animal, talking about making sure that he completely and totally destroys the future of a child under the age of 12, who has been raped, I have to imagine my child, sitting there...
What I would like to post, would only be deleted, so it would not make any sense to continue.