Originally Posted by
speedball1
"Inability to see plain evidence and refusal to acknowledge, accompanied by
a mocking attitude and false accusations doesn't constitute proof. Add to this inconsistency in reasoning and your whole argument, if indeed it can be classified as such, comes crashing down like a house of cards."
,
More tippity-tap, (I love it!!) You saying that I have the "Inability to see plain evidence and refusal to acknowledge it" just adds more soft shoe routine to the act. you speak of "evidence", isn't that what I've been asking for ever since this thread started?? PRODUCE THIS "EVIDENCE" that you claim you have. I don't see one answer to my previous post. Not one response except to put me down. You attempt to discredit my augments while not offering one tiny shred of physical evidence to back up yours.
one more time! Making me look bad doesn't make you look good. Go ahead and try! I have argued reason and logic against faith and belief for decades with militant fundamentalists and am still waiting for the evidence to back ip their claims. I find you no different from them. Welllll! Perhaps a bit more humorous.
Respectful disagreement doesn't constitute putting you down unless you interpret it that way by identifying yourself worth with the ideas you put forth as fact. Your beliefs are not you. On the other hand, I agree that name-calling and mockery are ad hominem. However, I don't agree that my saying that you are unable to see my viewpoint is either. Actually, you have all the right in the world to hold whatever belief you wish and it shouldn't be any skin off anybody's nose unless your manner of stating your beliefs is offensive. In that case it's the manner of your expressing your views and not your beliefs that are questionable. I think that the problem in your case is that you express your views very vigorously and when someone responds with a little vigor you can't seem to tolerate it and begin to accuse these people of putting you down. I strongly suspect that if you'd tone it down a bit yourself then the responses you receive would most likely not be as irritating. No harm meant just a little advice.
As for the proof you require, I garnered some web site links that you might or might not wish to read. That's entirely up to you.
evolution
SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AGAINST EVOLUTION. The following are just some of the little publicised facts which contradict the "proven fact" of evolution theory. 1. FOSSILS
Ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/bowdenmalcolm/evol.htm
EvC Forum: Willowtree's Scientific Evidence against Evolution
... EvC Forum All Forums Science Forums Biological Evolution Willowtree's Scientific Evidence against Evolution... Topic: Willowtree's Scientific Evidence against Evolution. Wj. Member..
Science Against Evolution Official Home Page
... Science Against Evolution is a California Public Benefit Corporation whose... evidence. It is believed DESPITE scientific evidence. Science is against the theory of evolution...
www.scienceagainstevolution.org
SCIENTIFIC FACTS AGAINST EVOLUTION —. ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE. 3 Volume. ENCYCLOPEDIA. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Evolution Encyclopedia, Vol. 1... SECTION 7 - Additional Scientific Evidence Against Evolution. 25- THE LAWS OF NATURE VS. EVOLUTION The First and Second...
Evolution-facts.org/EncyclopediaTOC.htm
Scientific Arguments Against Evolution
Evidence for Intelligent Design... Evolution. Science Itself Refutes Darwinism... to the theory of evolution, at some time in the... • Scientific evidence casts serious doubts on the theory of evolution, for example...
www.straight-talk.net/evolution/arguments.shtml
Scientific Creationism - The Web Site
A collection of essays and articles which refute the theory of evolution and support young earth creationism.. . Evidence against the theory of evolution. Scientific Evidence Against the Theory of Evolution. A Critique... Primary Evidence Used to Support the Theory of Evolution. Rebuttals to other...
www.scientificcreationism.org
Evolution Exposé
... we get is, "If the scientific evidence is against the theory of evolution, then why don't all scientists... answer is that the theory of evolution isn't scientific, it is philosophic...
www.ridgecrest.ca.us/~do_while/sage/v7i12f.htm
Evolution vs. Design: Is the Universe a Cosmic Accident or Does it Display Intelligent Design?
The universe, the earth and life on it testify to the involvement of an Intelligent Designer. Macroevolution fails to explain the history of life on planet earth.. . falsifiable, predictive biblical creation model. Evidence for the Fine Tuning of the Universe - Why... macroevolution is false. A Scientific Case Against Evolution by Robert Locke, a...
www.godandscience.org/evolution
Main Creation Science Web Links
... advance knowledge of the scientific evidences of creation (and against evolution) in schools and among... We provide Biblical and scientific evidence that God created the universe, and...
www.creationism.org/topbar/linksWeb.htm
Evolution is not Necessarily True
Evolution is not Necessarily True. David D'Armond. Naperville, Illinois. Editor's Note: Mr.. . became aware of the serious scientific deficiencies of evolution as a result of changing... 3. Scientific facts and evidence are against evolution: A. Genetics-Evolutionists have...
http://www.truthmagazine.com/archive.../GOT020259.htm
Evidence Disproving Evolution
Thank you all very much! Posted on 10/11/2002 9:02:01 PM PDT by gore3000. Evidence Disproving Evolution... both in evolution and God, It is interesting that when shown scientific evidence against their theory evolutionists... that their belief in evolution is not based on science...
www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/767711/posts
BTW
I find you humorous as well.