Originally Posted by
labman
Ordinarily I am no Fred fan, but I see no harm in a second person confirming an answer and adding details. In this case, Fred brought up the important point of talking to an alternative first. My disgust with all this fussing is well known.
Is anyone a Fred fan except the IDs he creates as cheerleaders? :(
When a question calls for an opinion, there is no problem in adding confirmation to reinforce the opinion. Nor is there a problem with adding detail or other info. In such cases, though, its better to say something like; I agree with so and so, but wanted to add...
But I don't see that in this case. LT said to call a phone company to switch service, Fred said the same thing. I don't see any substantive difference. No one is going to cancel phone service until they have a replacement set up.
Fred has bought this reaction on himself by continuing a practice that is abhorrent and objected to by many. He's made matters worse by using phony IDs, spreading lies, insults and harassment because of valid criticisms.
Scott<>