|
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Nov 4, 2011, 03:40 AM
|
|
In 2016
Hello:
The right wing thinks Romney will be another liberal free spender like Bush was. Instead of supporting HIM for 8 years, do you think they'll let Obama win so they can run a REAL conservative in 2016?
excon
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Nov 4, 2011, 04:24 AM
|
|
Originally Posted by excon
in 2106?
excon
About a century out there Ex
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Nov 4, 2011, 04:45 AM
|
|
Obama will win only if there is some economic recovery. Romney most likely will be the nominee because the Repubics are doing what they always do... rigging the selection process for the "next in line " establishment selection. The conservative have more work to do getting seats in the House and Senate before you can say the Republican party is a conservative one.
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Nov 4, 2011, 04:55 AM
|
|
Hello tom:
So, you're not going to answer my question?
excon
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Nov 4, 2011, 05:03 AM
|
|
The answer is no... conservatives will not "let" Obama win if they have a say. His policies will be embedded into the bureaucracy with another 4 years and he will have the opportunity to swing the balance of the judiciary.
This election is crucial and the conservatives will have to suck it up and do what they can to get Romney elected if he is the nominee.
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Nov 4, 2011, 08:22 PM
|
|
There wouldn't be anything left to save after another 4 years of Obama.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Nov 5, 2011, 03:43 AM
|
|
2008 the President went with the false flag that he was some kind of moderate and enough people bought his like that he won against an over the hill moderate Republic. (See 'The Audacity of Hope'... loaded with 3rd way alternatives to the issues of the day) .
That mask is off and he can't use it again . So he's banking on the reincarnation of Huey Long populism with a dose of Truman rhetoric about Congress. It will not work in the end. The only thing that can beat the Republicans is themselves.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Nov 5, 2011, 04:19 AM
|
|
So Tom you like to state the bleeding obvious
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Nov 5, 2011, 04:30 AM
|
|
Double post deleted
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Nov 5, 2011, 04:33 AM
|
|
The question begged for the bleeding obvious. But why don't you expand on it to make it a broad discussion?
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
View more questions
Search
|