|
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 07:13 AM
|
|
GOP congressman apologizes to BP for '$20 billion shakedown'
GOP congressman apologizes to BP for '$20 billion shakedown' | Raw Story
During a hearing of the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Thursday, Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) called the $20 billion escrow fund that BP has promised to establish a "shakedown" and apologized to BP Tony Hayward.
It gets worse:
Following his statement earlier Thursday that the $20 billion fund amounted to a "shakedown" of BP, Barton found himself under attack not only from Vice-President Joe Biden and other Democrats, but from other Republicans as well. A Florida Republican has called for Barton to step down as the ranking member of the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Barton = Former Energy and Commerce Committee
Oil + Gas Industry = Donations to Barton of nearly $1.5 million
Barton speaks out against fines for BP ruining American jobs and devastating the environment...
Well done looking out for lining your pockets!
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 07:28 AM
|
|
Hello NK:
Yup. The Republicans are BOUGHT and PAID for by corporate America. No more evidence is needed than Joe Bartons' sad commentary.. He apologized TO BP for what WE'RE doing to THEM. Can you believe that??
You KNOW, of course, he wants the TAXPAYER to bail BP out. I thought the wingers were against bailouts, and corporate welfare - except when they're not... Bwa, ha ha ha ha.
excon
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 07:30 AM
|
|
You guys need to think some serious reform concerning "donations". Your politicians (esp the repubs) no longer represent their constituency but are in it for the gravy train. It must be frustrating for you guys.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 07:41 AM
|
|
Yeah it is bad form and bad pr.;politically tone deaf. I think Bob Ethridge should give him a beat-down.
But he's essentially correct. It is a shakedown ;typical Chi-town politics . You think not ? All of this was “negotiated” while Attorney General Eric Holder, who has already threatened BP with criminal prosecution, sat in the corner watching . Jamie Gorelick was sitting at the negotiation table too (supposedly representing BP... HAAAA! ) . I wonder what her role was .
And he is also right that just like TARP . It will be used as a slush fund.Does anyone have an accounting of where all the bucket-list stimulus funding went ? Come on VP Biden give us the details !
I wonder if the President plans to make BP pay for the hardship he has caused by his moratorium on drilling ?
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 07:42 AM
|
|
I guess neither of you noticed that the GOP leadership was quick to criticize Barton's comment. Dems are just as beholden to corporate interests - not to mention unions - so let's stop pretending this is mostly a GOP problem.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 07:46 AM
|
|
I thought the wingers were against bailouts, and corporate welfare
And I thought you were for due process and contract law.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 07:47 AM
|
|
Dems are just as beholden to corporate interests
Obama was a big benefactor of BP money .
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 07:53 AM
|
|
Here is BP's negotiator at the shakedown..
After leaving the Justice Department, Gorelick served for six years as vice chairwoman of Fannie Mae and got caught up in the mortgage agency’s accounting controversy. In 2005, two years after Gorelick left Fannie Mae, a federal investigation into the public-private mortgage company found that accountants had falsified signatures to erase $9 billion in losses from the books. Eliminating those losses resulted in Gorelick and four other Fannie Mae executives taking away six- and seven-figure bonuses in 1998.
The federal investigation found that Gorelick was paid more than $25 million during her time at Fannie, and the huge compensation received by Fannie Mae executives later became a major issue in Congress.
Jamie Gorelick's new challenge: Backing BP - Abby Phillip - POLITICO.com
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 07:54 AM
|
|
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
I guess neither of you noticed that the GOP leadership was quick to criticize Barton's comment.
Hello again, Steve:
Oh, I noticed, but the cat's out of the bag. The majority of the GOP AGREE with Barton, as tom so eloquently explained above. The only reason he HAD to apologize is because the leadership doesn't want the public to know what they REALLY think.
But, in the main, I don't disagree with you about the Democrats. They're bought and paid for too... But, if I were to guess which party is MORE in the pockets of big business, I'd have to say the Republicans...
Uhhhh... And, it's going to get WORSE - not BETTER, since Citizens United.
excon
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 07:59 AM
|
|
Originally Posted by tomder55
And I thought you were for due process and contract law.
Hello again, tom:
I am... But, if a settlement can be reached BEFORE lawsuits are filed, I'm for that too.
Again, what we we have here is a failure to communicate. What I call a settlement, you call a shakedown. What I call end of life counseling, you call a death panel. What I call the legislative process, you call ramming down throats...
One of us is speaking reality. The other is fudging.
excon
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 08:19 AM
|
|
Originally Posted by excon
But, in the main, I don't disagree with you about the Democrats. They're bought and paid for too... But, if I were to guess which party is MORE in the pockets of big business, I'd have to say the Republicans...
I'd have to say it goes in cycles. Right now they're betting on the GOP, in the 2008 cycle they were betting on Dems. But of the top 10 'heavy hitters,' six are unions, one is Democratic PAC, one is the former Association of Trial Lawyers, and another is Goldman Sachs, which all heavily favor Dems.
AT&T, the biggest contributor, and the National Assn of Realtors, split theirs fairly evenly. That means 8 of the top 10 donors heavily favor Democrats.
Uhhhh... And, it's going to get WORSE - not BETTER, since Citizens United.
If you ask me it's worse now that we have a president in permanent campaign mode trying to exploit the very crisis he's been so impotent on.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 08:23 AM
|
|
You guys are right about one thing . Any corporation that thinks they are buying anything when they give money to a politician is delusional. BP thought they had Obama in their pockets even though he has a history of hostility to all business. Bad move !
Actually let me amend this slightly . What BP bought with Obama contributions is rubber stamped permit revisions the week before the explosion.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 08:27 AM
|
|
Originally Posted by excon
What I call end of life counseling, you call a death panel.
No one is against end of life counseling unless it's forced on someone which is exactly what those writing the regulations favor, along with deciding which treatments they'll allow during end of life care. The fact is, these people want the kind of health care you get in say, Belgium.
Warning to Britain as almost half of Belgium's euthanasia nurses admit to killing without consent
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 08:32 AM
|
|
Originally Posted by tomder55
You guys are right about one thing . Any corporation that thinks they are buying anything when they give money to a politician is delusional. BP thought they had Obama in their pockets
Hello again, tom:
Well, when it came down to the taxpayers and the poor people in the gulf, OR BP, BP got thrown under the bus. Bummer for them, huh? But, as you infer, no Republican would have done it. When a Republican is bought and paid for, he STAYS bought.
And, it's going to get worse since Citizens United.
excon
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 08:37 AM
|
|
Yes the President was so concerned about the "poor people of the gulf " that he prevented the building of barrier berms ;the swift deployment of booms and the use of foreign ships designed to suck the oil from the water during oil spills.
He is so concerned about the "poor people of the gulf " that he imposed a moratorium on drilling forcing thousands of them onto unemployment .
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 08:49 AM
|
|
Originally Posted by excon
And, it's gonna get worse since Citizens United.
And the Dem's answer to that would have trampled free speech rights. But fortunately, too much bickering led to Pelosi yanking the bill. It's kind of hard to deciding who has rights and who doesn't after all.
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 09:03 AM
|
|
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
And the Dem's answer to that would have trampled free speech rights.
Hello again, Steve:
Ok, I buy your argument. SEIU is NOT a person, and is NOT entitled to free speech rights any longer. People are. Here's the First Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
I know what it says. I know you think it says something else.
I'll make THIS concession, though. If corporations have the same rights as people, they should suffer the same punishments people do when they violate other people rights. I know a corporation can now be found guilty of a felony - but NOBODY goes to jail.
Therefore, I propose that in the future, if a corporation commits a felony, every single employee in that corporation should go to the slam. Rights come with responsibilities.
excon
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 10:06 AM
|
|
Hello again, Steve:
I was careful to distinguish between individuals and corporations. You weren't. In fact, that's actually the BASIS for our disagreement - your inability to make that distinction.
excon
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Jun 18, 2010, 10:26 AM
|
|
Originally Posted by excon
Hello again, Steve:
I was careful to distinguish between individuals and corporations. You weren't. In fact, that's actually the BASIS for our disagreement - your inability to make that distinction.
I believe I was making that distinction, "convicted agents of corporations." And that's why I linked to the sentencing guidelines:
The guidelines and policy statements in this chapter apply when the convicted defendant is an organization. Organizations can act only through agents and, under federal criminal law, generally are vicariously liable for offenses committed by their agents. At the same time, individual agents are responsible for their own criminal conduct. Federal prosecutions of organizations therefore frequently involve individual and organizational co-defendants. Convicted individual agents of organizations are sentenced in accordance with the guidelines and policy statements in the preceding chapters. This chapter is designed so that the sanctions imposed upon organizations and their agents, taken together, will provide just punishment, adequate deterrence, and incentives for organizations to maintain internal mechanisms for preventing, detecting, and reporting criminal conduct.
There is no "just punishment" in sending every employee of a corporation like Enron to jail. Those responsible WERE sent to jail in every instance I cited, but there is no justice in punishing the guy taking out the trash because the CEO broke the law. The CEO goes to jail, the company is fined or whatever, and life goes on.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Your Congressman
[ 86 Answers ]
Hello:
SHOULD your congressman represent you, or the corporate interests in your district?
I ask, because our right winged friends think that ALL a business has to do to make money, is provide a good product at a good price... If that's so, then why would a businessman need representation...
Shakedown artist NY Governor Steam-roller Spitzer.
[ 17 Answers ]
Joe Goldstein of NY Sun reports today that NY Guv. Elliot Spitzer is going to require major internet stores like Amazon.com to be his tax collectors . He wants to impose an 8.375% sales tax on internet purchases of those of us who have the "privilege" of living in NY .
Spitzer's Christmas Tax...
A billion little spots
[ 5 Answers ]
If anyone reading this has any advice please help...
My face, top of my arms, chest and now boobs are absolutely covered in tiny tiny tiny lile black head spots, if you squeeze them (this sounds disgustin sorry, but you do actually get puss like stuff oozing from them) the worst areas are like...
View more questions
Search
|