|
|
|
|
New Member
|
|
Sep 8, 2007, 12:09 PM
|
|
Velocity Physics
Why it is easier to stop a tennis ball than a cricket ball moving with the same speed?
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 8, 2007, 02:20 PM
|
|
Well, you have to absorb the kinetic energy, work out the kinetic energy for a tennis ball and a cricket ball travelling at the same speed.
|
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Sep 8, 2007, 05:35 PM
|
|
Absorbing all the kinetic energy makes sense, but Wikipedia (last time I looked) states that momentum essentially represents how hard it is to stop something. Since kinetic energy and momentum have different formulas, can someone explain in greater detail?
|
|
|
New Member
|
|
Sep 13, 2007, 11:34 AM
|
|
Try absorbing all the kinetic energy
|
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Nov 12, 2007, 07:28 PM
|
|
In simple terms when the cricket ball comes in contact with your hand it expends more kinetic energy as it has a greater mass. The tennis ball is lighter and expends less kinetic energy.
|
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Nov 13, 2007, 04:52 PM
|
|
According to the principle of "Conservation of Momentum", this makes lot of sense.
A cricket ball, having much greater mass than a tennis ball, has a much greater momentum than the latter.
When the cricket ball hits my hand, and if I do not, for example, move my hand while it hits my hand, the skin and flesh of my hand are given the momentum of the ball and therefore I hurt a lot: I donot move my hand, but the skin and flesh of my hand get a lot of impact. My hand stays still, but skin and flesh move. They move much faster than in the case of tennis ball because of greater momentum of
The cricket ball.
That's why, it is advised that while catching a moving ball, especially a cricket ball, we move our hand backward. In this way it will hurt less.
|
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Nov 14, 2007, 04:10 AM
|
|
Another approach:
Rate of change of momentum = impressed force
The momentum of a Cricket ball being much more than that of a tennis ball, the force
required to stop a cricket ball is much more.
Hence more force (action and reaction) accurs between your hand and the cricket ball
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Nov 15, 2007, 03:21 AM
|
|
You can also consider inertia. A body of higher mass (cricket ball) is more difficult to stop than one of lower mass (tennis ball)
|
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Nov 15, 2007, 09:19 AM
|
|
tennis ball's momentum is lower than cricket ball , because mass is law
momentum= mass* velocity
F=change of momentum/time
so easier to stop a tennis ball
|
|
|
New Member
|
|
Nov 19, 2007, 06:35 PM
|
|
Comment on kesavan's post
This is correct. Change in momentum is related to force, not energy.
|
|
|
New Member
|
|
Dec 25, 2007, 06:55 AM
|
|
It is because of momentum...
We alll know that rate of change of momentun with respect to time gives the force exerted... thus we observe that force exerted by cricket ball is greater
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Sound velocity
[ 2 Answers ]
http://www.geocities.com/nk7jaffna/askmehelpdesk/xxx.doc
Please open web link for full details
Speaker transmit 1000Hz sine wave signal.
If vehicle is not move, human heard 1000Hz frequency.
Velocity & Physics
[ 1 Answers ]
A train approaches a small town with a constant velocity of
+28.6 m/s. The operator applies the brake, reducing the train’s
Velocity to +11.4 m/s. If the average acceleration of the train during
Braking is –1.35 m/s2, for what elapsed time does the operator apply
The brake?
Velocity
[ 1 Answers ]
The orbit of Halley's Comet around the Sun is a long thin ellipse. At its aphelion (point farthest from the Sun), the comet is 5.1 1012 m from the Sun and moves with a speed of 12.0 km/s. What is the comet's speed at its perihelion (closest approach to the Sun) where its distance from the Sun is...
View more questions
Search
|