|
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 28, 2005, 03:55 AM
|
|
Who is holder in Due Course??
I have a promissory note, stamped and signed as follows:
Pay to the order of Mortgage Co. X, without recourse mortgage Co. Y and signed by President of company and E.V.P.
also shows: Pay to the order of _____________without recourse, Mortgage Co. X
signed by president and C.F.O.
Mortgage Co. Y claims they are holder in due course.
My understanding of without recourse is that mortgage co Y has sold to Mortgage Co. X and has not further rights to future monies, or rights to note.
Am I reading this correctly??
|
|
|
Full Member
|
|
Sep 20, 2005, 06:07 AM
|
|
law school flashback
OK... lets see if I remember correctly from the bar exam...
I holder in due course is someone who:
takes for value, in good faith, and without cause to question its legitimacy(ie: forgery, claims against, etc.)
what are the circumstances surrounding the transfer?
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 20, 2005, 08:01 AM
|
|
Holder In Due Course
Originally Posted by sideoutshu
ok....lets see if I remember correctly from the bar exam.....
I holder in due course is someone who:
takes for value, in good faith, and without cause to question its legitimacy(ie: forgery, claims against, etc.)
what are the circumstances surrounding the transfer?
Whom is the holder of the note in order to enforce it.
|
|
|
New Member
|
|
Jun 8, 2009, 04:23 PM
|
|
answer to mr yet... mortgage company "Y" sells to mortgage company "X" WITHOUT RECOURSE. This means that purchasing mortgage company x cannot go back to selling mortgage company "Y" for them to pay any deficiency in payments caused by the borrower going into default on its payments under the terms of the note. This is good for the seller of the note and bad for the buyer of the note.
if the note said "WITH RECOURSE", then the purchaser of the note CAN look to the seller who sold him the note for any deficiency in payments caused by the borrower not paying his obligations. This is bad for the seller and good for the buyer.
hope this helps.
|
|
|
New Member
|
|
Aug 6, 2010, 01:58 PM
|
|
I understand what you are asking because I was seeking the same answer before. Based on educational research, the true holder is unknown. Investors does this on purpose when securitizing loans. I do have the answer in my notes but to give you a hint look up notes and securitization.
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 7, 2010, 07:24 AM
|
|
This is from 2005 and long since dead.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Foreign income as H1B holder in US
[ 3 Answers ]
I am working in US with H1B visa, and filing tax return on my US income. How should I treat second income from outside US in tax return? Thanks a lot.:confused:
401(K) - good or bad for H1B holder?
[ 5 Answers ]
I am on H1B visa for last two years and most likely will leave US after I finish 4 more years. I would take my funds back from 401(K) when I leave US. I know that I would have to pay 10% penalty. Also, I know that the company which handles my 401(k) funds will deduct 20% for tax retention. And then...
HIB holder and income tax
[ 1 Answers ]
An HIB visa holder has resided continuously in the US since Oct of 2004. He works for joint-venture and his basic salary is paid in home country (Nigeria) He receives a per diem in the US which is also paid by his employer but paid into his US account. This amounted to $90,000 in 2005. Is he...
Tax for H1B holder
[ 1 Answers ]
Hi, I got an postdoctoral fellow offer under H1B visa from one university in US. If I hold Singapore passport, do I need to pay tax? How about china possport? Thanks.
View more questions
Search
|